Writing Skills

| 「說人話」：繁體中文的去 AI 味改寫 skill。審查與改寫文字，去除 AI 味道、校正中國用語與半形標點，讓文字讀起來像真人寫的。 觸發時機：用戶說「去 AI 味」「說人話」「這段好 AI」「改自然一點」「幫我潤稿去掉 AI 感」「校對一下再發」，或要求檢查電子報、社群貼文、銷售頁、課程文案、客服回信、簡報、公告、Email 等對外文字的語感。 不要觸發：逐字翻譯、模仿特定品牌 voice、事實查核（非風格問題）、程式碼／log／設定檔、要求「潤成雷蒙的語氣」（那是 content-writing skill 的事，本 skill 只去 AI 味、不加個人風格）。

Onboard a new user into a Symbiotic AI setup by interviewing them one sharp question at a time and writing their own context files (SOUL.md, USER.md, NOW.md, and AGENTS.md) as plain Markdown they keep. Use this whenever someone is setting up a personal AI agent, wants their assistant to remember or understand them across sessions, mentions Symbiotic AI / SOUL.md / USER.md / NOW.md, is staring at blank template files full of [bracketed placeholders], or asks how to give an AI persistent context they own and can move between models. Trigger even if they do not say the word "onboard".

Extract evidence-grounded project facts from user-provided design attachments, identify missing information, and prepare the exact written fields required by supported design-award entry forms. Use when a user asks to prepare, draft, adapt, translate, or validate application text for iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product Design, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, or EPDA. Also use to build a reusable project dossier from briefs, decks, reports, manuals, patents, research, images, or prior application materials. Do not use for award selection alone, winner retrieval, design-quality scoring, final file-format auditing, or winning-probability prediction.

用于把已经完成的解题过程整理成结构化、可复现、可提交的 CTF 题解文档，适合赛后复盘、队内同步与对外提交说明;触发名:ctf-writeup

>- Assesses the production viability of findings, filtering out debug-only features and assertion traps. Use when findings have been validated and you need to confirm they are triggerable in production release builds (with assertions disabled). Don't use for writing reproduction scripts or patches.

>- Calculates the final risk score based on empirical evidence and architectural impact. Use when findings have been fully processed by previous stages and you need to append final risk scores to the finding files. Don't use for discovering new vulnerabilities or writing patches.

>- Extracts learnings from execution trajectories at the end of a Mantis loop. Use to parse agent conversations, extract successes, failures, and false assumptions, and append them to workspace/learnings.jsonl. Don't use for analyzing source code or writing patches.

Evaluate content quality. Use when: scoring drafts, checking hallucinations, or assessing brand voice compliance.

Audit multilingual content consistency. Use when: checking language parity, regional compliance, or translation quality.

Configure language settings. Use when: setting primary languages, do-not-translate terms, or locale formatting.

Score localized content quality. Use when: checking translation accuracy, cultural adaptation, or voice preservation.

Translate marketing content. Use when: localizing with brand voice preservation, quality scoring, or transcreation.

> Use when adding or editing a GitHub Actions workflow, composite action, or reusable workflow under `.github/` — new CI jobs, triggers, matrices, checkout/clone tuning, action pinning, GitHub App token auth, concurrency groups, `timeout-minutes`, `paths` filters, caching, or runner choice. Not for debugging red CI (use debugging-ci-failures) or wiring a new secret end to end (use managing-github-actions-secrets).

Conventions for adding or editing the SceneMenuBar above a scene's <SceneTitleSection>. Use when adding new menu items, moving items between menus, gating behind feature flags, building a new scene's menubar, or wiring rich inputs (tags, combobox) into the bar.

> Gates whether a code comment should exist and forces the ones that stay to explain why, not what. Use ALWAYS before writing or editing a comment in any language (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, SQL), and when reviewing a diff that adds comments. Not for user-facing copy (see `/writing-user-facing-copy`) or commit messages.

Guide for writing PostHog agent skills — job-to-be-done templates that teach agents how to use MCP tools to achieve a goal. Use when adding new product functionality that agents should know how to work with, creating a new skill, or updating existing skills in products/*/skills/.

Guide for writing or reviewing PostHog kea logic files (`*Logic.ts` / `*Logic.tsx`). Use when creating a new logic, adding actions/reducers/selectors/listeners/loaders/forms/router bindings, choosing between reducer vs selector vs cache, deciding between listeners and `kea-subscriptions`, wiring React with `useValues`/`useActions`/`BindLogic`, or onboarding to kea conventions. Read keajs.org for upstream API; this skill captures PostHog-specific conventions and idioms.

> Use ALWAYS before writing or editing user-facing copy, and whenever a code change adds or changes a string a user will see. Also carries feature-naming rules that are easy to get wrong, most importantly how to talk about the Wizard (name it "Wizard" once, then call it "the setup agent" / "the agent"). Not for internal code comments, commit messages, or variable names.

> How to author, edit, and adapt PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and write reports into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to customize a canonical scout for their own setup (narrow its scope, retune its thresholds, add disqualifiers), tweak a scout's schedule or dry-run posture, or write a brand-new scout from scratch for a specific use case (a custom event, a product surface no canonical scout covers), or steer a scout without editing it at all by leaving it a note. Covers the scout SKILL.md anatomy, the report contract, the dedupe + scratchpad-memory conventions, the scout-notes steering channel, the per-team skills-store path vs the canonical in-repo path, and the write-and-inspect test loop (with dry-run as an optional safety net). Trigger on "write/edit/customize a signals scout", "new scout for X", "tune my scout schedule", "make a scout that watches <event>", "leave a note for / give feedback to a scout", "tell the scouts about X".

Build, edit, test, enable, and monitor PostHog workflows over MCP. Author the action/edge graph so it runs and opens cleanly in the visual editor, then change drafts surgically with patch operations. Use when asked to build, set up, automate, change, fix, or debug a workflow, campaign, broadcast, drip sequence, or event-triggered automation in the workflows product.

>- Draft, audit, or minimally revise English- or Chinese-language academic prose to reduce formulaic, vacuous, mechanically repetitive, or process-leaking language while preserving claims, evidence strength, logical relations, manuscript-wide terminology identity, document-level pattern variation, and scholarly register. Use for papers, abstracts, grants, cover letters, and reviewer responses when the user asks to de-AI, humanize, audit AI-like phrasing, or rewrite text without changing meaning. English is primary; Chinese is supported. Not for detector evasion, policy circumvention, pure translation, non-academic copy, or adding facts, citations, examples, or author experiences that the source does not contain.

Turn a completed task, browser flow, artifact pipeline, failure-recovery trace, or repeatedly refined workflow into a new reusable skill package or a reviewed skill-design plan. Use when the user asks to make a new skill from real run history, extract a reusable workflow from conversation/logs/files, summarize lessons into a new skill, or produce a plan before writing files. Do not use to upgrade an existing skill or to execute the business workflow itself.

用火山引擎 Podcast AI 模型生成中文双人对话播客。当用户要把文章、报告、话题文本转成播客音频、生成对话式音频内容时使用，需要环境具备火山引擎 APP_ID 和 ACCESS_KEY。支持 mp3/ogg_opus/pcm/aac、语速调节、自定义音色、断点续传。不用于：单人朗读式 TTS（用普通语音合成）、英文播客（模型主要优化中文）、播客文稿本身的撰写（先用写作类 skill 产出文本再来）。

Plan implementation, design an approach, or create an architecture plan for a Bitwarden iOS feature. Use when asked to "plan implementation", "design approach", "architecture plan", "how should I implement", "what files do I need", or to create a design doc before writing code.

Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimental_log.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges everything into the template that already contains Intro + Related Work from Step 3. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 4 or when the user asks to "write the methodology and experiments sections" or "fill in the rest of the paper".

素材深度分析技能。当用户提供文章、推文、视频文稿等内容并要求分析时使用。 适用于：(1) 理解素材核心观点和论证逻辑，(2) 批判性评估内容，(3) 为后续写作提取可用素材， (4) 分析内容的传播价值。支持长文、短内容（推文/帖子）、视频文稿等多种内容类型。

分析播客/视频访谈内容，提取高价值信息点、金句、待验证背景， 并生成详细写作提纲。当用户提供访谈转录稿或整理稿，需要进行内容分析、 素材提取、或准备写作提纲时使用此 skill。

将播客/视频访谈的分析素材转化为访谈实录整理文章。按访谈原始 顺序组织，保留问答结构的对话感，补充背景解读，让读者通过文字快速了解 访谈全貌。当用户已完成访谈内容分析（有素材包和提纲），需要撰写正式文章 时使用此 skill。

科技专栏提纲生成技能。当用户提供素材（文章、推文、视频文稿等） 要求生成写作提纲时使用。生成 3-5 个差异化大纲方案（优先包含故事驱动型）， 每个方案保存独立文件供用户选择。

Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.

Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.

> Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.

> Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.

Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.

Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"skill\" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

> Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT DRAFTING — generating, redlining, or rewriting contract language from instructions. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Contract Drafting). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/ stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to draft this clause/agreement", "best AI for drafting contracts", "route this drafting task", or is about to generate/redline contract text and hasn't fixed a model.

> Pick the right LLM for LEGAL TRANSLATION — translating contracts, statutes, case law, and legal correspondence across languages, including Arabic/MENA. Vendor-neutral routing triangulated from mid-2026 evidence (WMT25 human eval, SwiLTra-Bench legal-MT, multilingual-reasoning proxies, ArabLegalEval). There is NO clean legal-translation leaderboard, so this vertical is directional and treats human legal-linguist review as mandatory. Asks up to 4 quick questions (language pair, cost, speed, privacy/certification), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to translate this contract/statute", "best AI for legal translation", "translate this legal doc to/from Arabic", or is about to machine-translate legal text without a fixed model.

Expert LGPD compliance advisor for Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Law 13,709/2018). Use this skill whenever a user asks about LGPD, Brazilian data protection, ANPD, personal data processing in Brazil, data subject rights under Brazilian law, legal bases for processing, sensitive data handling, DPO appointment in Brazil, data breach notification to ANPD, LGPD penalties (fines up to 2% of revenue / R$50M), international data transfers from Brazil, Brazil-EU mutual adequacy (January 2026 — SCCs/BCRs no longer needed for Brazil-EU transfers), LGPD gap assessments, privacy policy drafting for Brazilian operations, DPIA under LGPD, consent management, or comparing LGPD with GDPR. Trigger for any Brazil privacy or data protection question even if LGPD is not named explicitly.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.

> Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. This skill covers both prose craft (clarity, examples, parallel construction, voice, quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings). Use this skill whenever the user asks you to draft, edit, or improve legal writing and wants it to be genuinely persuasive — not just correct. Also trigger when the user mentions 'make it more persuasive', 'sharpen this', 'strengthen the argument', 'rewrite this section', 'punch it up', 'legal writing', 'draft a brief', 'draft a submission', 'write like a top advocate', or asks you to improve the rhetoric, flow, or force of any legal document. This skill complements the larissa-legal-voice skill (which handles tone and personal voice) by adding the persuasive technique layer on top.

Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

Optimizes Claude for proofreading French texts, whether literary, technical, or professional. Grammar and spelling checks, detection of barbarisms, and stylistic suggestions.

Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like \"we need to get audited\", \"a customer asked for our security report\", \"writing an information security policy\", or \"preparing for an audit\". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.