mcpbeat

Test Driven Development

ravila4/test-driven-development

(TDD) Use when implementing any feature or bugfix. Apply the Logic Gate to identify what needs tests, then use the Iron Rule for strict test-first development on logic.

1k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
118
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/ravila4/claude-adhd-skills --skill test-driven-development

The instruction itself

15 sections, as written by the author

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

The Two Gates

Before writing any code, pass it through two gates:

  • The Logic Gate — Triage. Does this piece contain logic?
  • The Iron Rule — For everything that passes the Logic Gate, strict TDD applies.
flowchart TD
    A[New code to write] --> B[Decompose into pieces]
    B --> C{{"Logic Gate: Does this piece contain logic?"}}
    C -->|"Conditionals, transformations, validation, state changes, error handling"| D["Iron Rule: TDD"]
    C -->|"Dataclasses, config, thin wrappers, type aliases, formatting"| E[Write directly]
    D --> F["RED: Write failing test"]
    F --> G["GREEN: Minimal implementation"]
    G --> H["REFACTOR: Clean up"]
    H --> I{More pieces?}
    E --> I
    I -->|Yes| C
    I -->|No| J[Done]

Gate 1: The Logic Gate

Decompose the work into its constituent pieces. For each piece, ask: does this contain logic?

Passes the Logic Gate (requires TDD):

  • Conditionals and branching
  • Data transformations and computations
  • Validation and parsing
  • State management and transitions
  • Error handling with recovery logic
  • Business rules and domain logic
  • Algorithm implementations

Does NOT pass the Logic Gate (write directly):

  • Dataclasses, NamedTuples, TypedDicts (pure data declarations)
  • Type aliases and protocol definitions
  • Configuration and constants
  • Thin wrappers that only delegate (no branching, no transformation)
  • Plot formatting and visual styling
  • Boilerplate (__init__.py, module-level setup)
  • String templates and static content

When in doubt: If you can't point to a conditional, transformation, or state change, it probably doesn't pass the Logic Gate.

Triage Output

Before writing code, briefly identify what passes and what doesn't:

  • "These pieces contain logic and need TDD: X, Y"
  • "These are declarations/glue and can be written directly: Z"

Gate 2: The Iron Rule

For code that passes the Logic Gate: never write logic without a preceding failing test.

If logic is written before its test:

  • Stop — the test you write now can only describe what you already wrote, not verify intended behavior
  • Delete the logic and restart test-first
  • This applies to logic specifically, not declarations

Red-Green-Refactor Cycle

RED: Write a Failing Test

Write a single minimal test demonstrating intended behavior:

  • Clear, descriptive name
  • Test actual functionality (not mocks unless necessary)
  • Focus on one behavior
  • If test name contains "and", split into separate tests

Verify RED: Confirm Failure

Run tests and confirm:

  • Test fails for the expected reason (missing feature)
  • Not failing due to syntax errors
  • This verification is non-negotiable

GREEN: Minimal Implementation

Write the simplest possible code satisfying the test:

  • Avoid feature creep
  • Don't refactor unrelated code
  • Don't over-engineer

Verify GREEN: Confirm Pass

Confirm:

  • The new test passes
  • No existing tests break

REFACTOR: Clean Up

Improve code quality while maintaining green status:

  • Eliminate duplication
  • Improve naming
  • Simplify logic
  • Run tests after each change

Quality Test Attributes

Minimal: Single responsibility per test

Clear: Descriptive name revealing behavior

Realistic: Demonstrate intended API usage

Focused: One assertion per test (generally)

Common Rationalizations to Reject

"I'll test afterward"

  • Tests written post-implementation pass immediately
  • Proves nothing about validation capability

"Manual testing covered edge cases"

  • Lacks systematic documentation
  • Not reproducible

"Tests-after achieve identical goals"

  • Tests-first answer: "What should happen?"
  • Tests-after answer: "What does this do?"
  • Fundamentally different approaches

Verification Checklist

Before considering work complete:

  • [ ] Logic Gate triage was performed
  • [ ] Every piece containing logic has corresponding tests
  • [ ] Each test for logic failed before implementation
  • [ ] Failures occurred for expected reasons
  • [ ] Code written is minimal
  • [ ] All tests pass without errors or warnings
  • [ ] Real code tested (mocks only when necessary)
  • [ ] Edge cases and error conditions covered for logic

Debugging Integration

Bug found? Write failing test reproducing it. Follow TDD cycle. Test proves fix and prevents regression.

Never fix bugs without a test.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take ravila4/test-driven-development from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.