3-tier competitor analysis (direct, indirect, secondary) for global markets — positioning, SWOT, content benchmark, market gap. Tools: SimilarWeb, Ahrefs, Semrush, Minea (dropshipping). Trigger: 'competitor research', 'competitive analysis', 'what competitors are doing', 'competitor analysis', 'market research'.
npx skills add https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills --skill 08-competitor-research-global
Ask user up to 4 questions before starting:
| Tool | What it does | Free tier? |
|------|--------------|-----------|
| SimilarWeb | Website traffic estimation, top sources, competitor comparison | Yes (limited) |
| Ahrefs | SEO/backlink analysis, keyword competition | Trial only |
| Semrush | SEO, ads research, keyword gap, competitor traffic sources | Yes (limited) |
| Meta Ads Library | All competitor ads currently running on Meta — public, free | Yes (free) |
| TikTok Creative Center | Top performing ads by industry, region | Yes (free) |
| Minea | Dropshipping ad spy — top selling products on FB/TikTok | Trial only |
| AdSpy / BigSpy | Ad intelligence across platforms | Paid only |
For each competitor:
facebook.com/ads/libraryFor dropshipping competitor research:
> See skill 29-dropshipping-mastery-global for full dropshipping research workflow.
Categorize competitors into 3 groups — don't just look at direct competitors:
| Tier | Definition | Criteria | Example (Mid-tier Spa) |
|------|------------|----------|------------------------|
| Direct | Same tier, same offering, same audience | Same price, same service, same area | Spa B same street, similar pricing |
| Indirect potential | Different offering but substitutable | Customer might pick them instead | Cosmetic clinic, at-home skincare, home beauty devices |
| Secondary | Same offering, different price tier | Competes when budget shifts | Premium spa (customer downgrades), budget spa (upgrades) |
For each competitor, analyze 8 dimensions:
| Element | Content |
|---------|---------|
| Main message | [Slogan, tagline, brand promise] |
| Visual style | [Color tone, photo style, video quality] |
| Price tier | [Low / Medium / High / Premium] |
| Target audience | [Gender, age, income, interests] |
| Stated USP | [What do they claim is their differentiation?] |
| Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-----------|------------|
| [List 3-5] | [List 3-5] |
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Main channel | [Facebook / TikTok / Instagram / YouTube / Email] |
| Posting frequency | [X posts/week] |
| Priority format | [Short video / Carousel / Long post / Reels] |
| Tone of voice | [Professional / Friendly / Humorous / Educational] |
| Content angle mix | [TOFU X% / MOFU X% / BOFU X%] |
| Best performing content | [Top 3 highest engagement posts/videos] |
| Channel | Yes / No | Followers / Likes | Activity rating |
|---------|----------|-------------------|-----------------|
| Facebook Page | | | |
| TikTok | | | |
| Instagram | | | |
| YouTube | | | |
| LinkedIn | | | |
| Website | | | |
| Email | | | |
Estimation method (no need for absolute precision):
| Signal | How to read |
|--------|-------------|
| Sponsored posts/month | Count "Sponsored" labeled posts in Meta Ads Library |
| TikTok video ad volume | TikTok Creative Center -> Top Ads -> filter by industry |
| Website traffic | SimilarWeb (free tier) or Semrush |
| KOL/UGC volume | Count brand-tagged videos on TikTok |
| Estimated metric | Value |
|------------------|-------|
| Active ads (Meta Ads Library) | [X ads] |
| Estimated monthly ad spend | [$X — based on ad count x avg CPM] |
| Has UGC/KOL? | [Yes/No — if yes, estimated X people] |
| Element | Overlap level |
|---------|---------------|
| Geography | [High / Medium / Low] |
| Age | [High / Medium / Low] |
| Income | [High / Medium / Low] |
| Interests | [High / Medium / Low] |
| Channels used | [High / Medium / Low] |
| Product/service | Competitor price | Your price | Difference |
|-----------------|------------------|------------|------------|
| [SKU 1] | | | |
| [SKU 2] | | | |
| [SKU 3] | | | |
| Competitor | Threat level | Reason |
|------------|--------------|--------|
| [Name] | High / Medium / Low | [1 short sentence] |
| | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | STRENGTHS — Your strengths competitors don't have or are weaker at | WEAKNESSES — Your weak points competitors exploit |
| External | OPPORTUNITIES — Market gaps competitors haven't claimed | THREATS — Competitor trends/moves threatening you |
Strengths
| # | Strength | Which competitor weak here? | How to leverage |
|---|----------|----------------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | | | |
| 2 | | | |
| 3 | | | |
Weaknesses
| # | Weakness | Which competitor strong here? | How to fix |
|---|----------|------------------------------|------------|
| 1 | | | |
| 2 | | | |
| 3 | | | |
Opportunities
| # | Opportunity | Why competitors haven't done it? | Recommended action |
|---|-------------|----------------------------------|--------------------|
| 1 | | | |
| 2 | | | |
| 3 | | | |
Threats
| # | Threat | From which competitor? | Defense strategy |
|---|--------|------------------------|------------------|
| 1 | | | |
| 2 | | | |
| 3 | | | |
2x2 matrix — pick 2 axes that fit your industry:
HIGH QUALITY
|
|
Comp C | [YOU]
(cheap, | (mid price,
good qual)| good qual)
|
------- LOW -------- HIGH ---- PRICE
|
Comp A | Comp B
(cheap, | (high price,
low qual) | low qual)
|
LOW QUALITY
| X-axis (horizontal) | Y-axis (vertical) | Best for |
|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
| Price | Perceived quality | Spa, F&B, fashion |
| Traditional vs Modern | Mainstream vs Niche | Education, tech |
| Convenience vs Experience | Mass vs Premium | F&B, retail |
| Online vs Offline | Self-serve vs Full service | Service, SaaS |
How to read the map:
| Gap type | Check question | Finding |
|----------|---------------|---------|
| Product gap | What need are customers solving DIY because no one serves it? | |
| Price gap | What price tier has no one claimed? (between budget and premium) | |
| Channel gap | What channel are competitors ignoring? (Email? TikTok Shop? SEO?) | |
| Content gap | What angle hasn't been done? (behind scenes? educational? data-driven?) | |
| Experience gap | What customer journey step is no one doing well? | |
| Gap | Attractiveness (1-5) | Feasibility (1-5) | Priority |
|-----|---------------------|-------------------|----------|
| [Gap 1] | | | High / Medium / Low |
| [Gap 2] | | | |
| [Gap 3] | | | |
For each competitor, pick top 5 posts/videos by engagement in last 30 days:
| # | Competitor | Format | Angle | Views/Reach | Engagement | Why effective? |
|---|------------|--------|-------|-------------|------------|----------------|
| 1 | | | | | | |
| 2 | | | | | | |
| 3 | | | | | | |
| 4 | | | | | | |
| 5 | | | | | | |
| Pattern | Description | Apply to you |
|---------|-------------|--------------|
| Common hook | [Hook style competitors use] | [Apply / Don't apply — reason] |
| Strong format | [Video/Carousel/Text most effective?] | |
| Posting time | [What hour, what day?] | |
| Common CTA | [What CTA type?] | |
| Viral element | [Common trait of effective content?] | |
| Lesson | From which competitor | How to apply |
|--------|----------------------|--------------|
| Effective content format | | [Adapt how] |
| Strong channel | | [Implementation] |
| Customer service | | [Improvement] |
| Pricing strategy | | [Adjustment] |
| Don't copy | Reason | Do this instead |
|------------|--------|-----------------|
| Copy content verbatim | Lose identity, suffer comparison | Take idea, adapt to your brand voice |
| Race to the bottom (price) | Unsustainable | Compete on value, not price |
| Imitate positioning | Become "cheap copy" | Find unique angle, differentiate |
| Follow trends they did | Late, lost effectiveness | Find new trends or new angle on old |
| Moat type | Competitor has? | You have? | Action |
|-----------|-----------------|-----------|--------|
| Brand recognition — First-recall | | | |
| Network effect — More users = more attractive | | | |
| Switching cost — Hard for customers to leave | | | |
| Data advantage — Big customer data | | | |
| Content library — Large content library, strong SEO | | | |
| Community — Loyal community | | | |
| Distribution — Strong channel network | | | |
| # | Action | Based on finding | Urgency | Timeline |
|---|--------|------------------|---------|----------|
| 1 | | | High / Medium | Wk 1-2 |
| 2 | | | | Wk 2-4 |
| 3 | | | | Mo 2 |
| 4 | | | | Mo 3 |
| 5 | | | | Long-term |
09-customer-insight-global02-campaign-brief-global05-ad-copy-global10-reverse-kpi-global00-marketing-plan-global29-dropshipping-mastery-globalBefore delivering report, check:
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".
Comprehensive product research and opportunity analysis for Amazon sellers. Analyzes demand, competition, profit potential, market entry barriers, and validates product ideas. Covers product sourcing, pricing strategy, and go-to-market planning. Use when the user asks about researching a product to sell, validating product ideas, product opportunity analysis, market research for Amazon, competition analysis, profit potential, should I sell this product, product viability, or any general product research questions.
Master the consultative sales methodology trusted by enterprise sales teams worldwide. Use Neil Rackham's research-backed question sequence to uncover needs and close complex deals. Use when: **Complex B2B sales** with long sales cycles; **High-value deals** requiring multiple stakeholders; **Solution selling** where discovery is critical; **Enterprise sales** with sophisticated buyers; **Consultative positioning** to differentiate from competitors
Complete product launch workflow coordinating 15+ specialist agents across research, development, marketing, sales, and operations. Uses sequential and parallel orchestration for 10-week launch timeline.
Content research and SEO writing methodology. Guides the agent through topic research, keyword identification, competitive analysis, and writing SEO-optimized content that ranks well and provides genuine value to readers.
Generate sandbox security policies from plain-language requirements and optional REST API documentation. Produces L4 or fine-grained L7 network policies and ordered network middleware configuration. Use for API access rules, middleware host selection, failure behavior, or built-in and operator-run middleware attachment. Trigger keywords - generate policy, create policy, update policy, change policy, sandbox policy, network policy, API policy, security policy, allow API, restrict API, network middleware, supervisor middleware.
Research a company, industry, or competitor set using web search and seven analytical lenses. Use when you need structured intel that feeds downstream PM skills.
Take minhnv0807/08-competitor-research-global from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.