Productivity Skills

Set up Convex backups and run a restore DRILL that proves recovery — snapshot, restore into a throwaway preview, assert the data came back — plus a schedule matched to your RPO and a gated recovery runbook.

Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate, test, or validate an AI agent, decide whether an agent is ready to ship or go live, choose how to grade an agent's answers (exact match, similarity, meaning, keywords, quality, or custom), design a test set of questions and expected answers, or interpret evaluation results into a go/no-go decision. Invoke it before the user hand-builds tests or declares an agent "done.

| Builds a scenario-driven content pack for a Microsoft 365 Copilot customer demo. From a customer name, line of business, and target personas, it proposes demo scenarios for operator approval, then generates fictional Word/PowerPoint/Excel example files plus an AI Demo Delivery Plan (persona roster with tenant-account mapping, email and Teams chat scripts, calendar meetings with agendas, a meeting transcript, and app-tagged Copilot prompt workflows grounded in the generated content). After approval it can OPTIONALLY seed the Office files into a customer-named OneDrive folder and optionally post the Teams chat scripts live; email, calendar, and recordings are drafted for manual loading. Use when the user asks to "set up a Copilot demo", "build demo content for a customer", "seed a demo tenant", "create a demo delivery plan", "fill a demo tenant with realistic content", or "generate demo scenarios and sample files". Do NOT use for sending real email, booking real calendar events, or production-tenant data.

Turns vague or complex business requests (decisions, problems, projects, incidents, processes, ideas, documents, communications) into a clear outcome, an appropriately sized plan, and a verified result. Also assesses whether repeated work should become a reusable Skill and can draft that Skill package. Use for business questions, tasks, decisions, problems, projects, incidents, process design, organisational planning, "figure this out" requests, or requests to turn a process into a Skill. Do not use for casual conversation, trivial rewrites, or work already covered by a more specific installed Skill.

Use this skill whenever a Scout user asks to schedule a Teams chat reminder or follow-up that should be sent only if a person has not already posted a relevant update after the request, including "remind them Thursday if there is no news," "follow up unless they reply," or "check the chat first and only nudge if needed." Use it before creating the Scout automation or sending any message.

Build a personalized, day-by-day study plan for an upcoming exam, certification, or test. Use this skill whenever someone mentions studying for an exam, prepping for a certification, needs a study schedule, is trying to pass a test by a certain date, or asks for help organizing exam prep, even if they don't use the word "plan" explicitly (e.g. "I have my PMP in 6 weeks and don't know where to start", "help me study for the bar", "I need to prep for the AZ-900"). Also use when someone wants to revise or adjust an existing study plan because their timeline changed, they fell behind, or their confidence in a topic shifted.

Refine the user's existing plan, decision, or draft through relentless refinement. Use when the user wants to sharpen or stress-test their thinking.

Create, polish, rewrite, review, repurpose, brainstorm, or configure evidence-led LinkedIn posts, captions, comments, hooks, ideas, and conversation-scoped writing profiles from facts, notes, drafts, research, announcements, or lived experience. Use for the initial LinkedIn request and every follow-up clarification, revision, correction, constraint, or preference in the active task.

Scan the user's recent Microsoft 365 signals (emails, active chats/channels, calendar subjects) to surface recurring patterns worth productizing — either as a blog post (the user explains the same thing repeatedly) or as an automation (the user does the same multi-step task repeatedly). Use when the user asks "what should I write about?", "what could I automate?", "find patterns in my work", or invokes "/pattern-radar".

Build a prioritised morning work brief for Microsoft Scout from Outlook mail, calendar, and Teams chats - what the user owes people, what is blocked on others, what is coming up, and what to do first. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a morning brief, a Monday or weekly brief, a daily digest, a "what is waiting on me" or "what did I miss" summary, a catch-up after time off, a review of unresolved team threads or pending actions, a look at the week ahead, or wants to know who is blocking them - even if they never use the word "brief". Also use it when setting any of this up as a recurring Scout automation.

Reference for Claude Code's 6 Task Management tools — TaskCreate, TaskGet, TaskList, TaskUpdate (structured tracking) and TaskOutput, TaskStop (background execution). Covers tool parameters, status lifecycle, completion rules, dependency management, and conventions

Conduct an adaptive interactive interview on any topic and produce a structured markdown report, summary, or implementation plan. Use when the user says "interview me", "interview me about", "run an interview on", "help me think through", or wants guided discovery on any subject. Also triggers on "talk me through", "explore X with me", "help me plan Y", or "walk me through my thinking on Z" when the user wants a guided conversation rather than a direct answer. Applies broadly — career decisions, project ideas, product direction, personal goals, research questions, team problems — not just technical topics.

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using Agent Teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use for deep analysis, deep understanding, or codebase investigation.

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using agent teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use for deep analysis, codebase understanding, or thorough investigation of a focus area.

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using agent teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

Deep exploration and synthesis workflow using agent teams with dynamic planning and hub-and-spoke coordination. Use when asked for "deep analysis", "deep understanding", "analyze codebase", "explore and analyze", or "investigate codebase".

Work with the Toss Securities Open API for Korean and US stock market data, stock info, exchange rates, market calendars, account and holdings lookups, order history, buying power, sellable quantity, commissions, and delegated autonomous trading workflows that can create, modify, or cancel live orders. Use when an agent needs to run user-delegated buy/sell/order-management loops, call or build against developers.tossinvest.com, inspect the Toss OpenAPI schema, generate client code, or operate with TOSS_API_KEY/TOSS_SECRET_KEY credentials.

Standardize remediation decisions, baseline-policy entries, and legal-review banners for accepted, deferred, or policy-blocked audit findings.

Use this skill to assess and plan a migration from AWS MSK (Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka) to Confluent Cloud. Triggers on user intent like "migrate MSK to Confluent Cloud", "move off MSK", "MSK to CC cutover", "Zero-Cut migration from MSK", "kcp scan my MSK", or any discussion of MSK-to-CC assessment, planning, cluster sizing, Cluster Linking setup, Gateway-based switchover, or post-cutover validation. Do NOT trigger for non-MSK Kafka sources (open-source Kafka, Aiven, Confluent Platform, Redpanda) — this skill is MSK-only. Do NOT trigger for greenfield Confluent Cloud projects with no existing Kafka source. Do NOT trigger for general Kafka programming questions (producer/consumer code, Kafka Streams) unrelated to migration.

>- Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

>- Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

>- Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

>- Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.

>- Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

Design meeting rhythms, metric reporting, quarterly planning, and decision-making velocity for scaling companies. Use when decisions are slow, planning is broken, the company is growing but alignment is worse, or leadership meetings consume all time without producing decisions.

Strategic account planning and execution for enterprise deals. Use when planning complex sales cycles, managing multiple stakeholders, applying MEDDICC qualification, tracking deal health, or building mutual action plans. Includes the "stale MAP equals dead deal" pattern.

Answer App Store release go/no-go questions and choose the next focused release skill. Use for readiness planning, first-submission blockers, release sequencing, or deciding whether to stage or submit; use appstore-review-readiness for concrete validate, submit, monitor, cancel, and repair commands.

Define, validate, run, resume, and audit repo-local `.asc/workflow.json` automations with current `asc workflow`, including safe release/TestFlight flows and step outputs.

Work productively in Tuist-generated Xcode workspaces. Use for `tuist generate`, generated workspace builds, focused generation, tags, buildable folders, and Xcode build/test commands after generation.

Use when designing or reviewing safe Grok Build hooks for linting, tests, formatting, notifications, command guards, lifecycle automation, or project hook trust decisions.

Use for clean architecture, modular monoliths, hexagonal boundaries, service boundaries, data flow, dependency direction, ADRs, or large feature planning.

Apply established brainstorming and ideation methodologies to game design problems, features, systems, UX flows, live-ops ideas, content concepts, and stuck team discussions. Use when the user wants a specific brainstorming method rather than generic ideation, or when you should choose and run a method such as SCAMPER, How Might We, Crazy 8s, Six Thinking Hats, Brainwriting 6-3-5, Worst Possible Idea, forced connections, Lotus Blossom, or a morphological matrix.

Extract 3 to 5 actionable design pillars from a game, feature, loop, or system based on what the design actually rewards and prioritizes. Use when a team can describe mechanics but cannot clearly articulate the principles those mechanics serve, when pillars are vague, generic, or contradictory, or when you need a sharper set of tradeoff-driven pillars that can guide decisions and cut features.

Evaluate game features, feature pitches, live-ops ideas, UX changes, economy changes, roadmap choices, retention initiatives, monetization initiatives, and ambiguous design problems using the GROW model: Goal, Reality, Options, Will. Use when a team needs structure, clearer decision-making, better option generation, explicit tradeoff analysis, or a concrete recommendation and next-step plan instead of circular discussion.

Audit a game, feature, progression loop, return-player experience, metagame layer, or session structure for density of goals, immediacy of goals, safe stopping points, and return triggers. Use when evaluating whether players can quickly find something meaningful to do, whether the game offers enough short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals, whether session lengths are flexible enough for real player schedules, or why a game feels aimless, overwhelming, or unable to fit into fragmented playtime.

Start from the ideal player-facing result and work backward to the design steps, systems, and decisions required to reach it. Use when a team knows the kind of experience it wants but not how to structure the path there, when redesigning a feature around a stronger destination, or when clarifying what must be true for a concept to feel successful.

Extract the ideal player persona and anti-persona for a game, feature, loop, or progression structure based on the design itself. Use when a team can describe mechanics but cannot clearly articulate who the design is truly for, which player motivations and tolerances it suits, which players it will alienate, or how audience fit should shape design decisions. Focus on behavioral and motivational personas first, and optionally add demographic or market-fit hypotheses when the user explicitly asks for that layer.

Design or audit prosocial experiences in session-based multiplayer games using a three-phase chapter model built around Setup, Little Loops, and Long Tail. Use when evaluating co-op games, team shooters, MOBAs, mission-based multiplayer, or other repeat-session formats; when planning how to prime trust before play, reinforce repeatable prosocial actions during play, and carry positive social momentum across sessions; or when a multiplayer game feels socially flat, hostile, forgettable, or unable to turn one good match into another.

Audit game design goals, feature objectives, OKRs, initiative aims, or any stated design intent against the SMART criteria adapted for game design. Use when a user shares a design goal, player experience target, retention goal, or feature aim and wants it evaluated or rewritten. Trigger on phrases like "audit my design goals", "is this a good design objective", "my feature goal is...", "we want players to feel...", "our aim for this feature is...", or whenever someone states what a design should achieve and it feels vague or unmeasurable. Also trigger when a design document contains aims or success criteria that need stress-testing. Even soft goals like "players should feel powerful" are valid — apply the framework and return both the audit and a rewritten version.

Help analyze recurring conflict patterns on software or game projects by identifying likely collaboration archetypes, behavior patterns, project risks, and practical response strategies. Use when someone describes a teammate, lead, founder, stakeholder, client, producer, or collaborator whose recurring behavior is creating friction, slowing decisions, damaging trust, or disrupting execution. Focus on observable behavior and project consequences, not clinical diagnosis, then suggest safer and more effective next moves.

Help a beginner or early-stage game team estimate the likely development time for a game concept based on scope, target milestone, current team, skill coverage, work model, and production constraints. Use when someone asks how long a game might take, whether their current team can hit a target date, what timeline range they should expect for a prototype, vertical slice, release, or live F2P project, or how missing roles and part-time availability change development time. Ask for missing information when concept, team, scope, or staffing assumptions are unclear, then provide a rough timeline range, main schedule drivers, hidden time sinks, and ways to shorten the path.

Generates a complete, polished HTML documentation page, a processing checklist, an AstroBin post JSON, a PixInsight process icon set (XPSM), AND a ready-to-paste PixInsight project Description field for a deep-sky object (DSO) astrophotography project. Use this skill whenever the user mentions astrophotography, a DSO name (NGC, IC, Messier, Sharpless, etc.), wants to document an imaging session, mentions PixInsight project documentation, wants to create an observation report, or asks to generate a page/document for a nebula, galaxy, cluster, or other deep-sky target. Triggers on phrases like "create doc for NGC XXXX", "generate DSO page", "document my session on", "make a PixInsight doc for", "astro documentation page", "pixinsight project description", "description field pixinsight", "processing checklist", "workflow checklist", "astrobin", "astrobin post", "astrobin upload", "process icons", "xpsm", "pixinsight icons". Always use this skill — not a generic HTML generator — when the subject is a deep-sky object.

Generate probability-weighted alternative options that challenge default thinking. Forces unconventional alternatives and exposes hidden assumptions behind the "obvious" choice. For decision-point analysis, NOT full design exploration. Triggers on "대안", "alternatives", "옵션 뽑아", "options", "어떤 방법이", "아이디어", "다른 방법", "선택지".

Prospective failure analysis using Gary Klein's pre-mortem technique. Assumes complete failure, works backward to identify risks, leading indicators, and circuit breakers. Counters optimism bias by forcing systematic exploration of failure modes before they materialize. Use for project plans, architecture decisions, technology adoption, business strategy, or feature launches. Triggers on "리스크", "위험", "실패하면", "swing-mortem", "뭐가 잘못될 수 있어", "risk", "what could go wrong", "걱정되는 점", "failure modes", "리스크 분석", "위험 분석".

Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".

Use this skill for any task involving Thai date formatting, Buddhist Era (พ.ศ.) ↔ Gregorian (ค.ศ.) year conversion, or Arabic ↔ Thai numeral conversion. Trigger whenever the user asks to: convert พ.ศ. to ค.ศ. or vice versa, format a date in Thai government / business / casual style, parse a Thai date string with full or abbreviated month names, or convert digits between 0123456789 and ๐๑๒๓๔๕๖๗๘๙. Also trigger for requests like "แปลง พ.ศ. เป็น ค.ศ.", "จัดรูปแบบวันที่ไทย", "วันที่แบบราชการ", "เปลี่ยนเป็นเลขไทย", or any variation involving Thai calendar dates.