3 440 productivity skills from 510 authors. They keep notes, tasks, calendars and plans in order. Half of them fit into 1 854 tokens or less — that is what one costs your context window when the agent loads it. 478 ship runnable scripts rather than instructions alone. 51 of them cannot work without an MCP server, most often rube. We also found 336 copies of these same skills sitting in other people's repositories — counted once here, not 336 times.
3 440 unique 510 authors 2 011 updated this month 275 from vendors
Manages post-Gate-2 release activities with Agile V rigor. Rollout plans, rollback procedures, sign-off checklists. Use after Human Gate 2 for production deployment.
Author and optionally direct-launch one durable loop-graph run for long-horizon agent work. Use when the user invokes /octopus, asks to design or start a multi-round run, needs durable state, gated milestones, owner decision boundaries, cross-host continuity, or independent audit. Detect Codex or Claude Code from context instead of asking. For a self-contained task, recommend the host's ordinary task or goal directly. Do not execute or resume existing runtime node files from this authoring skill.
>- Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning.
Persistent Obsidian-based memory for coding agents. Use at session start to orient from a knowledge vault, during work to look up architecture/component/pattern notes, and when discoveries are made to write them back. Activate when the user mentions obsidian memory, obsidian vault, obsidian notes, or /obs commands. Provides commands: init, analyze, recap, project, note, todo, lookup, relate.
Author and optionally direct-launch one durable loop-graph run for long-horizon agent work. Use when the user invokes /longgraph (or legacy /octopus), asks to design or start a multi-round run, needs durable state, gated milestones, owner decision boundaries, cross-host continuity, or independent audit. Detect Codex or Claude Code from context instead of asking. For a self-contained task, recommend the host's ordinary task or goal directly. Do not execute or resume existing runtime node files from this authoring skill.
This skill should be used before implementing features, building components, or making changes. It guides exploring user intent, approaches, and design decisions before planning. Triggers on "let's brainstorm", "help me think through", "what should we build", "explore approaches", ambiguous feature requests, or when the user's request has multiple valid interpretations that need clarification.
Use when designing databases for data-heavy applications, making schema decisions for performance, choosing between normalization and denormalization, selecting storage/indexing strategies, planning for scale, or evaluating OLTP vs OLAP trade-offs. Also use when encountering N+1 queries, ORM issues, or concurrency problems.
Use this agent when you need a brutally honest Rails code review from the perspective of David Heinemeier Hansson. This agent excels at identifying anti-patterns, JavaScript framework contamination in Rails codebases, and violations of Rails conventions. Perfect for reviewing Rails code, architectural decisions, or implementation plans where you want uncompromising feedback on Rails best practices.\\n\\n<example>\\nContext: The user wants to review a recently implemented Rails feature for adherence to Rails conventions.\\nuser: \"I just implemented a new user authentication system using JWT tokens and a separate API layer\"\\nassistant: \"I'll use the DHH Rails reviewer agent to evaluate this implementation\"\\n<commentary>\\nSince the user has implemented authentication with patterns that might be influenced by JavaScript frameworks (JWT, separate API layer), the dhh-rails-reviewer agent should analyze this critically.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>\\n\\n<example>\\nContext: The user is planning a new Rails feature and wan...
This skill should be used when managing the file-based todo tracking system in the todos/ directory. It provides workflows for creating todos, managing status and dependencies, conducting triage, and integrating with slash commands and code review processes.
Resolve all TODO comments using parallel processing
Resolve all pending CLI todos using parallel processing
Plans technical projects with risk-first development, milestone structuring, and managed deferral. Use when planning software projects, defining milestones, structuring development phases, or breaking down complex tasks into manageable iterations.
Triage and categorize findings for the CLI todo system
Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue before planning implementation
Selects implementation strategy (vertical/horizontal/hybrid) with risk assessment. Use when: planning features or deciding development approach.
Audit a speq project's health — spec-library structure, feature/decision-log/plan validation, mission-to-spec sync, unrecorded plans, and gitignore hygiene — then guide fixes. Use when the user asks to audit, health-check, doctor, lint, or sanity-check the specs or repo, or after cloning or inheriting a speq project.
Headless, non-interactive version of /speq-plan for CI or agent-driven runs. Plans a feature without a live interview, commits the result to a feat/plan-name branch, and opens a draft PR. If a decision genuinely needs a human, it persists the partial plan and open questions and asks in a PR comment instead of blocking. Arg: plan name, feature intent text, PR number, or branch name.
Plan-authoring workflow — spec delta authoring, test mapping, plan.md/decision-log.md generation, expert-task tagging, headless escalation, and revision mode. Triggered by planner-agent.
Plan a feature or change through a clarifying interview, producing spec deltas, plan.md, and decision-log.md via planner-agent with adversarial review. Use when the user asks to plan, spec, design, or scope a new feature, a change or removal of existing behavior, a refactor, or a fix — before any implementation.
When the user wants to ingest sources, change brain pages, register decisions, catalog content publications, or lint brain pages for provenance and link integrity.
MUST USE PROACTIVELY before executing a user request with two or more distinct deliverables, downstream skills, Agentic SEO pillars, dependencies, or decision/evidence/check gates. Use for compound requests such as research plus brain updates, technical audit plus content plan, content plus publication review, or any bulleted/numbered request with separate outcomes. Do not use for a single clear task.
Connect design decisions to business outcomes through competitive analysis, opportunity mapping, Jobs to Be Done, outcome-driven discovery, value proposition design, and UX metrics. Shape product direction with strategic frameworks grounded in evidence.
Use when brainstorming a product or feature where multiple valid technology choices exist and the wrong one is costly, when the user asks for 'objectively best' or 'highest quality', or when the domain has tools/frameworks where marketing or popularity biases could mislead research agents. Also use when starting architecture decisions, evaluating tech stacks, or when the user mentions bias, vendor lock-in, hallucinated benchmarks, or wants research-backed decisions rather than default recommendations.
当用户明确要求"使用 brainstorming"或"使用 awesome-code"时使用。⚠️ 不适用:用户只是想优化/改进某个功能(应直接修改)、只是询问技能问题(应直接回答)、没有明确使用 brainstorming/awesome-code 的一般性开发。
上下文优化专家。专注于长对话中的上下文管理、token 效率和性能优化。解决 lost-in-middle、context poisoning 等问题,提升 AI 代理在复杂任务中的表现。
> Run a monthly bookkeeping close checklist with reconciliation.
> Build avalanche or snowball debt payoff plans with payment schedules.
> Track asset depreciation using MACRS schedules and Section 179 expensing.
> Organize business expenses by IRS Schedule C categories for tax filing.
| 需要创意方案、探索产品方向、发散思维、本质问题分析 用户说"我想做一个XX""帮我规划XX产品""帮我设计一下需求" 用户给出新产品方向,但尚未完成本轮 brainstorm 交互确认 新产品从0到1的第一步 用户明确说"跳过 brainstorm / 直接需求调研 / 已完成头脑风暴" 需求已明确且用户明确要求直接执行具体后续 skill
|
|
Maintenance rules for the skill-forge repo. MUST run Decision Test before accepting changes. MUST update platform-registry when platforms change. MUST keep SKILL.md under 500 lines. MUST verify cross-file consistency after changes. Triggers on "update skill-forge", "maintain skill-forge", "refresh platform registry", "check community tools".
Validate, fix, and publish skills as GitHub repos. Structures workflow skills for execution fidelity. Registers skills across platforms via symlinks and guides first-use onboarding. Use when the user says "create a skill", "forge a skill", "review this skill repo", "audit this skill", "audit all my skills", "audit this project", "clean up my skills", "check my skill", "publish this skill", "push this to GitHub", "structure my workflow skill", "extract a skill from this folder", "turn my prototype into a skill", or points to a project directory with mixed skills and rules, or to an engineering folder where a skill was being prototyped. Forge: triage → discover → classify → validate → fix → local ready. Workshop input → triage extracts skill before audit. Nothing found → onboard user, scaffold, then same pipeline. Publish to GitHub when requested (Step 4).
> Simulates a full academic journal peer review with EIC decision and 3 independent reviewers (Methodology Expert, Domain Specialist, Devil's Advocate). Scores 1–10, provides major/minor Use when the user asks for a peer review, journal-quality feedback, readiness assessment, or to simulate reviewer responses before submission.
> Generates falsifiable, testable research hypotheses from notes, documents, and research content. Use when the user asks to brainstorm hypotheses, generate research questions, identify testable predictions, or discover patterns across their notes. Do NOT use for general Q&A — only when structured hypothesis output is needed.
Persistent memory and task coordination for this project. Invoke for any prompt about past work, project state, in-progress tasks, prior decisions, gotchas, or capturing a non-obvious learning. Also covers semantic search across project knowledge and external docs.
Organize files using the PARA method (Building a Second Brain). Intelligent categorization into Projects, Areas, Resources, and Archive with inbox workflow. Triggers on "organize my files", "organize my downloads", "second brain", "PARA method", "clean up files". Creates numbered PARA folders, renames poorly-named files, and maintains rollback logs. Works via bash commands in Claude Code terminal.
Organize files using the PARA method (Building a Second Brain). Intelligent categorization into Projects, Areas, Resources, and Archive with inbox workflow. Triggers on "organize my files", "organize my downloads", "second brain", "PARA method", "clean up files", "declutter". Creates numbered PARA folders (0-Inbox, 1-Projects, 2-Areas, 3-Resources, 4-Archive), renames poorly-named files, and maintains complete audit trails.
Authors, reviews, installs, and debugs GitHub Agentic Workflows in repositories, including workflow markdown, frontmatter, gh aw compile and run flows, safe outputs, security guardrails, and operational patterns. Use when creating or maintaining GH-AW automation. Don't use for standard deterministic GitHub Actions YAML, generic CI pipelines, or non-GitHub automation systems.
| Real-time quotes, K-line charts, order book, trade ticks, intraday capital flow, market sentiment temperature, trading session schedule, security lists, exchange rates, and IPO calendar for HK/US/A-share/SG via Longbridge. Also covers ADR premium and FX carry frameworks.
会议待办整理助手适合运营、产品、销售、software在用户提出“会议后该做什么”这类问题,需要快速拆解目标、判断重点并形成可执行结果时使用,帮助基于输入材料生成待办拆解、决策摘要、风险和跟进清单。
业务诊断助手适合运营、产品、technical、销售在用户提出“这件事该怎么做”这类问题,需要快速拆解目标、判断重点并形成可执行结果时使用,帮助基于输入材料生成摘要、诊断结论、行动建议和可复用交付物。
风险审阅助手适合人力资源、管理者、运营、software在用户提出“这里有什么风险”这类问题,需要快速拆解目标、判断重点并形成可执行结果时使用,帮助基于输入材料生成摘要、诊断结论、行动建议和可复用交付物。
微信公众号文章订阅与推送。自动部署 wechat-download-api 服务,定时轮询关注的公众号,检测新文章后总结并推送到飞书。触发条件:用户提到"公众号订阅"、"微信文章推送"、"wechat watch"、"公众号更新"等,或由 cron 定时任务触发。前置条件:用户需要有微信公众号(订阅号/服务号均可)用于扫码登录。
IM 定时提醒技能,支持一次性和周期性定时任务。通过 cron job 在指定时间唤醒 Agent,自动检测当前 IM 频道,保证消息准确送达。
百度地图 JSAPI WebGL (BMapGL)完整开发指南,覆盖地图初始化、覆盖物、图层、事件、样式、性能优化的任务,一站式开发高性能 3D 地图应用。当用户提及 BMapGL、百度地图、jsapi-gl或相关地图开发需求时自动触发。