useClick MCP Server

by useclick Your server? Claim it

answering

useClick is answering right now. Last checked 12 min ago.

Short links, QR codes, link and website analytics: create and edit links, read clicks and visitors.

Uptime history 4 days of history

4 days agonow

100.0%

Uptime 24h

92 of 92 checks

—

Tools

hidden behind auth

321 ms

Response time

average over 24h

OAuth sign-in

Access

streamable-http

Nothing serious here today

Today is the operative word: we check useClick every 15 minutes and re-read its code on every release. Watch it and you find out the day that stops being true.

Connect this server

Endpoint below is the one we actually reach during checks — not the one copied from a README. Last verified 12 min ago.

Claude Code Claude Desktop Codex Cursor VS Code

run in your terminal

claude mcp add mcp --transport http https://useclick.io/api/mcp

~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://useclick.io/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

~/.codex/config.toml

[mcp_servers.mcp]
url = "https://useclick.io/api/mcp"

.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://useclick.io/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

.vscode/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp": {
      "url": "https://useclick.io/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

This endpoint answered with an authorization challenge. The server is running, and it signs you in through your browser: there is no API key to paste.

Endpoints

URL	Transport	State	Latency	Checked
https://useclick.io/api/mcp	streamable-http	sign-in	212 ms	12 min ago

Alternatives to useClick

same job, measured the same way

Filoo MCP

by jrlprost

Create short links, fetch click analytics, and generate QR codes via the filoo.app API.

34 installs/wk local only

Flit

by flitlink

Short links, QR codes and click analytics on Flit. Tools: create/list/stats/delete links.

answering

CodeQR

by codeqr

Create and manage CodeQR short links, QR codes, and analytics from any MCP client.

answering

LotsLink

by lots

Free, unlimited short links, QR codes and click analytics your AI agent can create and track.

answering

Linkonda

by linkonda

Create and manage Linkonda short links and QR codes, with no per-visitor tracking.

49 installs/wk local only

Sinkto.Link

by sinkto

Free URL shortener: manage short links, QR codes and click analytics from AI clients.

answering

UTMKit

by utmkit

UTM-tagged short links with naming rules, QR codes and click analytics, from your AI.

answering

Link Center

by mylink

Dynamic, editable QR codes + short links with scan analytics and branded QR rendering.

answering

useClick — questions

Answers built from our own checks of this server.

Why is there no tool list for useClick?

The server answered our handshake with an authorization challenge, so it is running — but it will not describe its tools to an anonymous client. To see them you need to connect with your own credentials. We record it as alive, not as broken: 100.0% of checks in the last 24 hours got a reply.

Is useClick working right now?

We send a real MCP handshake every 15 minutes. Over the last 24 hours 92 of 92 checks got a reply (100.0%), average response time 321 ms. The bar chart above shows every period we have measured.

How do I connect useClick?

Copy the ready config from this page — we generate it for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Cursor and VS Code, each with the file path that client actually reads. It is a remote server, so there is nothing to install — the client connects to the address. You sign in through your browser once and the client keeps the session: no key to copy, and it refuses anonymous clients.

How do you sign in to useClick?

No API key is involved. useClick answers our knock with an OAuth challenge, so you authorise it once in your browser and the client keeps the session. That is also why we see no tool list: it will not describe itself to an anonymous client, and that is the server working as intended, not a fault.

How fast is useClick?

It answers our handshake in 321 ms on average, which is faster than 42% of all working MCP servers we measure. The comparison comes from our own checks across the whole registry, every 15 minutes.