Fix engine for PR review comments. Fetches review comments (Gemini bot or human), categorizes by impact, posts a prioritized fix queue, and applies fixes on dev approval. Called directly for quick fixes, or internally by pr-review-agent as part of full PR review.
npx skills add https://github.com/wednesday-solutions/ai-agent-skills --skill pr-review
Load this skill when a dev wants to act on PR review comments:
Also triggered automatically by GitHub Actions when Gemini bot posts a PR review.
Do NOT use this skill for: creating a new PR (use pr-create), or committing code (use git-os). This skill only runs on an already-open PR that has review comments on it.
Fix in this order — lower number = fix first.
| Rank | Category | Examples |
|------|----------|---------|
| 1 | security | auth issues, injection risks, data exposure |
| 2 | breaking | API contract changes, interface changes |
| 3 | logic | wrong conditions, missing edge cases |
| 4 | performance | N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders |
| 5 | naming | variable/function/class names, casing |
| 6 | style | formatting, whitespace, import order |
Rule: never fix a style item while a security or breaking issue is pending.
# Gemini Review — PR #<n>
| # | Category | File | Issue | Status |
|---|----------|------|-------|--------|
| 1 | security | src/db.js | SQL query not parameterized | ⬜ pending |
| 2 | logic | src/user.js | Missing null check on user.profile | ⬜ pending |
| 3 | naming | src/auth.js | Variable `x` is unclear | ⬜ pending |
To fix: `@agent fix #1 #2` Fix all: `@agent fix all`
| Action | Tool |
|--------|------|
| Read a file before applying a fix | Read |
| Apply a fix to a file | Edit |
| Run git commands (commit, push) | Bash |
| Search for a pattern across files | Grep |
| Find files by name | Glob |
@agent fix #N)git-os SKILL.md before making any commitfix(scope): description\n\nResolves review item #N✅ fixedIf a fix cannot be applied cleanly, post a comment explaining the conflict. Never force-push or silently skip a fix.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take wednesday-solutions/pr-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.