Supplier Scorecard Skill for Claude

Build supplier performance scorecards with KPIs, quality metrics, delivery performance, cost management, and improvement plans

3k tokens

context cost

the whole folder, loaded on every use

files

instructions only

copies elsewhere

how many repositories repackaged it

134

stars on the repo

on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository

npx skills add https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill supplier-scorecard

The instruction itself

18 sections, as written by the author

Supplier Scorecard

Overview

Establish supplier performance metrics that drive accountability, identify improvement opportunities, and ensure supplier excellence. Scorecards balance compliance, quality, delivery, cost, and relationship factors.

Scorecard Framework

1. Core KPI Categories

Quality Metrics (Product delivered meets specifications):

Defect rate (# defects / total units delivered)
First-pass yield (units meeting spec without rework)
Return rate (units returned due to quality issues)
PPM (parts per million) defects
Quality certifications maintained (ISO 9001, etc.)

Delivery Metrics (Goods arrive on time, complete):

On-time delivery rate (% orders delivered by promised date)
Delivery accuracy (% orders with correct quantity/items)
Lead time performance (actual vs. promised)
Order fill rate (complete orders vs. partial shipments)
Forecast accuracy (supplier delivery vs. demand forecast)

Cost Metrics (Pricing and cost management):

Price per unit trend (month-over-month, year-over-year)
Total cost of ownership (all-in cost vs. competitors)
Volume discounts earned (reflect volume commitment)
Cost reduction initiatives (savings from supplier improvements)
Contract compliance (pricing matches agreement)

Service Metrics (Responsiveness and support):

Response time to inquiries (<24 hours, <4 hours)
Issue resolution rate (% resolved within SLA)
Complaint resolution time (average days to close)
Customer satisfaction score (monthly survey)
Proactive communication (advance notice of changes)

Compliance Metrics (Legal, regulatory, contractual):

SLA compliance (99.9% uptime, etc.)
Documentation accuracy (invoices, packing slips)
Regulatory certifications (current and maintained)
Code of conduct compliance (ethics, labor, environmental)
Data security/privacy compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, etc.)

Scorecard Template

SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE SCORECARD

Supplier: [Name]

Reporting Period: [Month/Quarter]

Overall Score: [Score] / 100

Quality (Weight: 30%)

|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|

| Defect Rate (PPM) | <500 | 425 | 95 | Within target |

| First-Pass Yield (%) | >98% | 97.5% | 90 | Slight downtrend |

| Return Rate (%) | <1% | 0.8% | 95 | Acceptable |

Delivery (Weight: 25%)

|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|

| On-Time Delivery (%) | >98% | 96.5% | 85 | 2 late shipments this month |

| Delivery Accuracy (%) | 100% | 99.8% | 95 | 1 order short |

| Fill Rate (%) | 100% | 100% | 100 | All complete shipments |

Cost (Weight: 20%)

|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|

| Price Per Unit ($) | $50 | $50.25 | 85 | 0.5% increase vs. contract |

| Volume Discount (%) | 10% | 10% | 100 | Earning full discount |

| Contract Compliance | 100% | 100% | 100 | Pricing per agreement |

Service (Weight: 15%)

|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|

| Response Time (<24hr) | 100% | 100% | 100 | Always quick to respond |

| Issue Resolution (SLA) | 95% | 92% | 85 | 1 issue took 5 days |

| Customer Satisfaction | 4.5/5 | 4.3/5 | 90 | Slight dip this month |

| Proactive Communication | Yes | Yes | 100 | Monthly business reviews |

Compliance (Weight: 10%)

|--------|--------|--------|-------|-------|

| SLA Compliance (%) | 99.9% | 99.85% | 90 | Minor downtime reported |

| Documentation Accuracy | 100% | 99% | 95 | 1 invoice error |

OVERALL SCORE CALCULATION

|----------|--------|-------|----------|

| Quality | 30% | 95 | 28.5 |

| Delivery | 25% | 95 | 23.75 |

| Cost | 20% | 89 | 17.8 |

| Service | 15% | 94 | 14.1 |

| Compliance | 10% | 96 | 9.6 |

| TOTAL | 100% | | 93.75 |

RATING: EXCELLENT (90-100) / GOOD (80-89) / ACCEPTABLE (70-79) / NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (<70)

Scoring Methodology

Establish Clear Scoring Ranges:

QUALITY - Defect Rate (PPM):
Target: <500 PPM
100 points: 0-250 PPM (excellent)
90 points: 251-500 PPM (good)
75 points: 501-1,000 PPM (acceptable)
50 points: 1,001-2,000 PPM (needs improvement)
25 points: 2,001+ PPM (poor)

DELIVERY - On-Time Rate (%):
Target: 98%+
100 points: 99%+ (excellent)
95 points: 98-99% (good)
85 points: 96-98% (acceptable)
60 points: 94-96% (needs improvement)
30 points: <94% (poor)

COST - Price Per Unit Variance (%):
Target: Contract price (0% variance)
100 points: -2% to 0% (excellent, beating price)
90 points: 0% to +1% (good, at contract)
75 points: +1% to +3% (acceptable, slight overage)
50 points: +3% to +5% (needs improvement)
25 points: +5%+ (poor, significant overage)

Performance Trends & Analysis

Track Performance Over Time:

SUPPLIER SCORECARD TRENDS - LAST 6 MONTHS

Month | Quality | Delivery | Cost | Service | Overall | Trend
-------|---------|----------|------|---------|---------|-------
Jan | 92 | 94 | 85 | 92 | 90.5 | Baseline
Feb | 94 | 92 | 87 | 93 | 91.2 | Slight up
Mar | 93 | 95 | 88 | 94 | 91.8 | Improving
Apr | 95 | 96 | 90 | 94 | 93.2 | Strong
May | 95 | 95 | 89 | 94 | 92.9 | Sustained
Jun | 95 | 95 | 89 | 94 | 93.75 | Excellent

TREND ANALYSIS:
- Overall score: UP 3.25 points (3.6% improvement)
- Quality: Consistently strong; improving process
- Delivery: Improved from 92% to 95% (positive trend)
- Cost: Slight improvement but watch price increases
- Service: Consistently excellent

ASSESSMENT: Supplier performing well and improving. Recommend continued partnership.

Improvement Plans (for underperforming suppliers)

When Supplier Falls Below Threshold (e.g., <80 overall score):

SUPPLIER IMPROVEMENT PLAN - ACME Parts Inc.
Effective Date: March 1, 2024
Duration: 90 days (30/60/90 day reviews)

CURRENT PERFORMANCE:
Overall Score: 72/100 (Below acceptable threshold)
- Quality: 65 (High defect rate: 1,200 PPM vs. target 500)
- Delivery: 72 (On-time rate 93% vs. target 98%)
- Cost: 85 (Acceptable)
- Service: 75 (Slow response times)

SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT TARGETS:
By 30 days (April 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 900 PPM
- On-time delivery: Up to 95%
- Response time: <12 hours for all inquiries

By 60 days (May 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 700 PPM
- On-time delivery: Up to 96.5%
- Service satisfaction: 4.2/5 or higher

By 90 days (June 1):
- Defect rate: Down to 500 PPM (target)
- On-time delivery: Up to 98% (target)
- Overall score: 80+ (acceptable minimum)

ACTION ITEMS:
1. Root cause analysis: Why defect rate high? (Due: March 8)
2. Quality improvement plan: Specific fixes (Due: March 15)
3. Production schedule review: Can they meet 98% on-time? (Due: March 15)
4. Staffing assessment: Adequate resources? (Due: March 15)
5. Weekly touchpoints: Verify progress (Every Monday)

SUPPORT FROM US:
- Dedicated account manager (assigned: Sarah Kim)
- Quarterly business reviews (instead of annual)
- Shared visibility to demand forecast
- Technical support if needed

ESCALATION PATH:
- 30-day mark: If not meeting targets, escalate to suppliers' VP
- 60-day mark: If still missing targets, consider alternate suppliers
- 90-day mark: If overall score <75, begin transition to new supplier

SIGNATURE:
Our Company: _________________ Date: _________
ACME Parts Inc.: _________________ Date: _________

Strategic Supplier Relationships

Tier Suppliers by Strategic Importance:

TIER 1 - STRATEGIC PARTNERS (5-10% of suppliers, 60-80% of spend)
Examples: Primary component supplier, sole-source materials
Approach: Collaborative, long-term partnership
Frequency: Quarterly business reviews + monthly operational check-ins
Governance: Dedicated account managers; joint planning
Investment: Joint improvement projects, shared risk/reward

TIER 2 - PREFERRED SUPPLIERS (20-30% of suppliers, 15-30% of spend)
Examples: Alternative suppliers, secondary components
Approach: Performance-based, competitive incentives
Frequency: Quarterly business reviews; monthly scorecard reviews
Governance: Account manager; escalation path defined
Investment: Annual benchmarking; selective improvements

TIER 3 - TRANSACTIONAL (60-70% of suppliers, <10% of spend)
Examples: Commodity suppliers, spot purchases
Approach: Cost-focused, minimal relationship investment
Frequency: Annual performance review
Governance: Procurement team manages
Investment: Minimal beyond scorecard tracking

EXAMPLE SCORECARD WEIGHTS BY TIER:
Metric | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3
--------|--------|--------|--------
Quality | 35% | 30% | 20%
Delivery | 30% | 25% | 25%
Cost | 15% | 30% | 40%
Service | 15% | 10% | 10%
Compliance | 5% | 5% | 5%

(Tier 1: Invest in quality; Tier 3: Optimize for cost)

Supplier Communication

Monthly Scorecard Review (with supplier):

AGENDA (30-minute call):
1. Overall score review (5 min)
   - Congratulate on improvements
   - Flag any concerns

2. Category deep-dives (15 min)
   - Quality: Any issues to address?
   - Delivery: On track for month?
   - Cost: Any challenges?

3. Improvement initiatives (5 min)
   - What's working well?
   - What needs focus next month?
   - Support needed from us?

4. Relationship/feedback (5 min)
   - How's our partnership?
   - Any concerns from their side?
   - Schedule next meeting

TONE: Collaborative problem-solving, not punitive

Quarterly Business Review (Tier 1 suppliers):

QBR AGENDA (60 minutes):
1. Business update (10 min)
   - Company/product roadmap
   - Market changes
   - Volume forecast

2. Supplier performance (10 min)
   - Scorecard trends (6-month view)
   - Achievements and improvements
   - Challenges/red flags

3. Strategic initiatives (15 min)
   - Joint projects (cost reduction, quality improvement)
   - Product development opportunities
   - Supply chain optimization

4. Planning (15 min)
   - Next quarter demand forecast
   - Capacity planning
   - Any risks/constraints?

5. Relationship/closing (10 min)
   - Feedback exchange
   - Commitment to next quarter
   - Action items and owners

DOCUMENTATION: Distribute meeting notes within 24 hours; track action items

Escalation Triggers

Automatic Escalation to Supplier Leadership if:

- Overall scorecard drops below 75 for 2 consecutive periods
- Quality: Defect rate increases >50% from baseline
- Delivery: On-time rate falls below 90%
- Cost: Price increases >5% without notice
- Service: Response time >48 hours or SLA breach
- Compliance: Any regulatory/safety violation
- Financial: Public evidence of financial distress
- Relationship: Loss of key account manager or technical support

ESCALATION NOTIFICATION:
Send formal letter to supplier's VP/President documenting:
- Performance metrics below acceptable threshold
- Business impact to our organization
- Required improvements and timeline
- Consequences if not addressed (supplier review, transition)
- Offer to collaborate on improvement plan

ESCALATION RESOLUTION:
- Executive-level commitment to improve
- Detailed action plan with weekly updates
- If not improving: Begin transition to alternate suppliers

Best Practices

Clear Metrics: Align on definitions; avoid ambiguity
Regular Reviews: Monthly scorecards, quarterly business reviews
Transparency: Share scores and trends openly with suppliers
Collaborative: Position as partnership, not adversarial
Fair Weighting: Reflect what matters to business
Benchmark: Compare to industry standards and competitors
Actionable Feedback: Specific improvement areas identified
Recognition: Celebrate Tier 1 suppliers' achievements
Continuous Improvement: Joint projects to reduce costs, improve quality

10. Risk Mitigation: Diverse supplier base; avoid over-concentration

Use this skill to: Drive supplier accountability, improve performance, manage supply chain risk, and build strategic partnerships.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue

XLSX

by anthropics

vendor ×15

Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas

Picks random winners from lists, spreadsheets, or Google Sheets for giveaways, raffles, and contests. Ensures fair, unbiased selection with transparency.

Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.

MATLAB and GNU Octave numerical computing for matrix operations, data analysis, visualization, and scientific computing. Use when writing MATLAB/Octave scripts for linear algebra, signal processing, image processing, differential equations, optimization, statistics, or creating scientific visualizations. Also use when the user needs help with MATLAB syntax, functions, or wants to convert between MATLAB and Python code. Scripts can be executed with MATLAB or the open-source GNU Octave interpreter.

UMAP dimensionality reduction. Fast nonlinear manifold learning for 2D/3D visualization, clustering preprocessing (HDBSCAN), supervised/parametric UMAP, for high-dimensional data.

Creating interactive data visualisations using d3.js. This skill should be used when creating custom charts, graphs, network diagrams, geographic visualisations, or any complex SVG-based data visualisation that requires fine-grained control over visual elements, transitions, or interactions. Use this for bespoke visualisations beyond standard charting libraries, whether in React, Vue, Svelte, vanilla JavaScript, or any other environment.

Access AlphaFold 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.

Comprehensive Python library for astronomy and astrophysics. This skill should be used when working with astronomical data including celestial coordinates, physical units, FITS files, cosmological calculations, time systems, tables, world coordinate systems (WCS), and astronomical data analysis. Use when tasks involve coordinate transformations, unit conversions, FITS file manipulation, cosmological distance calculations, time scale conversions, or astronomical data processing.

16k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take w95/supplier-scorecard from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.