Structure and package support escalations for engineering, product, or leadership with full context, reproduction steps, and business impact. Use when an issue needs to go beyond support, when writing an escalation brief, or when assessing whether an issue warrants escalation.
npx skills add https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill escalation
You are an expert at determining when and how to escalate support issues. You structure escalation briefs that give receiving teams everything they need to act quickly, and you follow escalation through to resolution.
From: Frontline support
To: Senior support / technical support specialists
When: Issue requires deeper investigation, specialized product knowledge, or advanced troubleshooting
What to include: Ticket summary, steps already tried, customer context
From: Senior support
To: Engineering team (relevant product area)
When: Confirmed bug, infrastructure issue, needs code change, requires system-level investigation
What to include: Full reproduction steps, environment details, logs or error messages, business impact, customer timeline
From: Senior support
To: Product management
When: Feature gap causing customer pain, design decision needed, workflow doesn't match customer expectations, competing customer needs require prioritization
What to include: Customer use case, business impact, frequency of request, competitive pressure (if known)
From: Any support tier
To: Security team
When: Potential data exposure, unauthorized access, vulnerability report, compliance concern
What to include: What was observed, who/what is potentially affected, immediate containment steps taken, urgency assessment
Note: Security escalations bypass normal tier progression — escalate immediately regardless of your level
From: Any tier (usually L2 or manager)
To: Support leadership, executive team
When: High-revenue customer threatening churn, SLA breach on critical account, cross-functional decision needed, exception to policy required, PR or legal risk
What to include: Full business context, revenue at risk, what's been tried, specific decision or action needed, deadline
Every escalation should follow this structure:
ESCALATION: [One-line summary]
Severity: [Critical / High / Medium]
Target: [Engineering / Product / Security / Leadership]
IMPACT
- Customers affected: [Number and names if relevant]
- Workflow impact: [What's broken for them]
- Revenue at risk: [If applicable]
- SLA status: [Within SLA / At risk / Breached]
ISSUE DESCRIPTION
[3-5 sentences: what's happening, when it started,
how it manifests, scope of impact]
REPRODUCTION STEPS (for bugs)
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]
Expected: [X]
Actual: [Y]
Environment: [Details]
WHAT'S BEEN TRIED
1. [Action] → [Result]
2. [Action] → [Result]
3. [Action] → [Result]
CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION
- Last update: [Date — what was said]
- Customer expectation: [What they expect and by when]
- Escalation risk: [Will they escalate further?]
WHAT'S NEEDED
- [Specific ask: investigate, fix, decide, approve]
- Deadline: [Date/time]
SUPPORTING CONTEXT
- [Ticket links]
- [Internal threads]
- [Logs or screenshots]
When escalating, quantify impact where possible:
| Dimension | Questions to Answer |
|-----------|-------------------|
| Breadth | How many customers/users are affected? Is it growing? |
| Depth | How severely are they impacted? Blocked vs. inconvenienced? |
| Duration | How long has this been going on? How long until it's critical? |
| Revenue | What's the ARR at risk? Are there pending deals affected? |
| Reputation | Could this become public? Is it a reference customer? |
| Contractual | Are SLAs being breached? Are there contractual obligations? |
Good reproduction steps are the single most valuable thing in a bug escalation. Follow these practices:
Don't escalate and forget. Maintain ownership of the customer relationship.
| Severity | Internal Follow-up | Customer Update |
|----------|-------------------|-----------------|
| Critical | Every 2 hours | Every 2-4 hours (or per SLA) |
| High | Every 4 hours | Every 4-8 hours |
| Medium | Daily | Every 1-2 business days |
Not every escalation stays escalated. De-escalate when:
When de-escalating:
When handling escalations:
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
| Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Official Opentrons Protocol API for OT-2 and Flex robots. Use when writing protocols specifically for Opentrons hardware with full access to Protocol API v2 features. Best for production Opentrons protocols, official API compatibility. For multi-vendor automation or broader equipment control use pylabrobot.
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.
Take w95/escalation from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.