26 skills published by tt-a1i across 3 repositories. Together they weigh 1 815 392 tokens — that is what loading all of them at once would cost you in context.
26 skills 1 815 392 tokens total
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
Simplification audit or authorized codebase simplification whose stated objective is to remove accidental complexity. Use for evidence-backed deletion or consolidation of dead code, duplicate state, redundant APIs or layers, ownerless abstractions, obsolete compatibility or design records, and over-engineering in any language; also use for 代码简化 or 熵回收. Do not use for general code review, onboarding, style-only refactoring, or performance tuning.
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Orchestrate one approved SPEC READY through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions through Codex Task Messenger, validate the returned receipt, and archive a completed child. Use only when the user explicitly asks to execute an approved spec in a fork, or when handling a Messenger reply, resume, or recovery event for an execution fork this skill launched. Requires Codex App native task tools and codex-task-messenger; use the manual fork plus spec-executor route elsewhere.
> Craft verifiable, tight goal prompts for AI coding agents (Claude Code /goal, Codex Automations, Pi), either from a standalone task interview or from an already-approved to-goal handoff. Use when the user says "给我一个 goal 提示词", "帮我写个 goal", "设置一个自动化任务", "我想让 agent 自动做 X", or asks to turn a task into a self-running loop. Ensures every goal has a checkable completion criterion so the agent knows when it's done.
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
Compact the current conversation into a portable handoff document, with an optional live clarification path for compatible Codex tasks.
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a report — HTML on request — then grill through whichever one you pick.
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
Convene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review, then a chaired verdict reporting consensus and dissent.
Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
Execute the latest approved SPEC READY from an inherited or forked conversation, keeping implementation work out of the planning thread. Use after to-spec when the final spec fits one implementation session and the new thread should implement, test, review, and return a structured receipt without rewriting a to-goal handoff. Do not use for unresolved specs, multi-session builds, parallel handoffs, or context that needs compression; use to-tickets or to-goal for those.
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Turn an approved spec, agent-ready ticket, tracker frontier, or partially implemented ticket into a verifiable execution goal without re-interviewing the user. Use after to-tickets or triage, before starting a fresh implementation session; use --all only for an explicitly requested cross-ticket goal.
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
Stop. That last message did not land — re-pitch it.
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.
Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.