Answer Reviewer Questions

Answer Reviewer Questions

For each reviewer question thread, recall the implementer's reasoning and compose a raw answer. The answers are plain text and feed into a downstream reply-drafting skill that applies voice rules and reply formatting.

Step 1: Collect Question Threads

Use the question threads from conversation context. Each thread has: thread id, file path, line (use originalLine when line is null), the reviewer's original comment, and the reconciled intent from $interpret-feedback.

If no question threads were provided, report that there are no questions to answer and stop.

Step 2: Answer Each Thread

For each thread:

• Run the $recall-reasoning skill with <path>:<line>. It returns either recalled reasoning from a past transcript, or a fallback derived from reading the commit diff and surrounding code.
• Compose a one-or-two-sentence answer from the returned reasoning. Quote or paraphrase the implementer's own words when the recalled reasoning explains the decision well.
• Do not mention Claude, transcripts, or that the reasoning was recalled. The answer reads as the implementer's own explanation.

Step 3: Output Answers

Output one block per thread:

**Thread <id>** (<path>:<line>)
<answer text>
_Grounding: derived from current code_

Include the _Grounding:_ line only when $recall-reasoning returned no transcript. Omit it when the answer is grounded in recalled reasoning.

Then call update_plan to mark this step completed and continue with the next step of the active workflow.

Rules

• Do not load $github-voice or apply reply formatting. Downstream drafting applies voice rules when composing the actual reply.
• When $recall-reasoning returned no transcript, still compose an answer from the current code and include the _Grounding:_ line so the downstream drafter knows the answer has weaker grounding.