Testing strategy for Supabase Studio. Use when writing tests, deciding whether a change needs tests and which type, extracting logic from components into testable utility functions, or reviewing test coverage. Covers unit tests, component tests, and E2E test selection criteria.
npx skills add https://github.com/supabase/supabase --skill studio-testing
How to write and structure tests for apps/studio/. The core principle: push
logic out of React components into pure utility functions, then test those
functions exhaustively. Only use component tests for complex UI interactions.
Use E2E tests for features shared between self-hosted and platform.
Reference these guidelines when:
| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix |
| -------- | ---------------- | -------- | ---------- |
| 1 | Logic Extraction | CRITICAL | testing- |
| 2 | Test Coverage | CRITICAL | testing- |
| 3 | Component Tests | HIGH | testing- |
| 4 | E2E Tests | HIGH | testing- |
testing-extract-logic - Remove logic from components into .utils.ts filesas pure functions: args in, return out
testing-exhaustive-permutations - Test every permutation of utility functions:happy path, malformed input, empty values, edge cases
testing-component-tests-ui-only - Only write component tests for complex UIinteraction logic, not business logic
testing-e2e-shared-features - Write E2E tests for features used in bothself-hosted and platform; cover clicks AND keyboard shortcuts
Is the logic a pure transformation (parse, format, validate, compute)?
YES -> Extract to .utils.ts, write unit test with vitest
NO -> Does the feature involve complex UI interactions?
YES -> Is it used in both self-hosted and platform?
YES -> Write E2E test in e2e/studio/features/
NO -> Write component test with customRender
NO -> Can you extract the logic to make it pure?
YES -> Do that, then unit test it
NO -> Write a component test
Remove as much logic from components as possible. Put it in co-located
.utils.ts files as pure functions: arguments in, return value out.
File naming:
ComponentName.utils.ts next to the componenttests/components/.../ComponentName.utils.test.ts mirroring the source path// ❌ Logic buried in component — hard to test without rendering
function TaxIdForm({ taxIdValue, taxIdName }: Props) {
const handleSubmit = () => {
const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === taxIdName)
let sanitized = taxIdValue
if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !taxIdValue.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
sanitized = taxId.vatPrefix + taxIdValue
}
submitToApi(sanitized)
}
return <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>...</form>
}
// ✅ Logic extracted to .utils.ts — trivially testable
// TaxID.utils.ts
export function sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value, name }: { value: string; name: string }): string {
const taxId = TAX_IDS.find((t) => t.name === name)
if (taxId?.vatPrefix && !value.startsWith(taxId.vatPrefix)) {
return taxId.vatPrefix + value
}
return value
}
// TaxIdForm.tsx — thin shell
const handleSubmit = () => {
const sanitized = sanitizeTaxIdValue({ value: taxIdValue, name: taxIdName })
submitToApi(sanitized)
}
Once logic is extracted, test exhaustively. Every code path needs a test:
// ❌ Only happy path
test('parses a filter', () => {
expect(formatFilterURLParams('id:gte:20')).toStrictEqual({ column: 'id', operator: 'gte', value: '20' })
})
// ✅ Every permutation
test('parses valid filter', () => { ... })
test('handles timestamp with colons in value', () => { ... })
test('rejects malformed filter with missing parts', () => { ... })
test('rejects unrecognized operator', () => { ... })
test('allows empty filter value', () => { ... })
Only write component tests when there is complex UI interaction logic that
cannot be captured by testing utility functions alone.
Valid reasons: conditional rendering from user interaction sequences,
popover open/close with keyboard/mouse, multi-step form transitions.
Not valid: testing a calculation or transformation that happens to live
in a component — extract to .utils.ts and unit test instead.
// Studio component test conventions
import { fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { customRender } from 'tests/lib/custom-render' // always use customRender, not raw render
import { addAPIMock } from 'tests/lib/msw' // API mocking in beforeEach
If a feature exists in both self-hosted and platform, create an E2E test.
Cover mouse clicks AND keyboard shortcuts (Tab, Enter, Escape, Arrow keys).
Extract reusable interactions into e2e/studio/utils/*-helpers.ts. Use
try/finally for resource cleanup. For E2E execution details, see the
studio-e2e-tests skill.
| What | Where |
| ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Util test examples | apps/studio/tests/components/Grid/Grid.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Billing/TaxID.utils.test.ts, apps/studio/tests/components/Editor/SpreadsheetImport.utils.test.ts |
| Component test examples | apps/studio/tests/features/logs/LogsFilterPopover.test.tsx, apps/studio/tests/components/CopyButton.test.tsx |
| E2E test example | e2e/studio/features/filter-bar.spec.ts |
| E2E helpers pattern | e2e/studio/utils/filter-bar-helpers.ts |
| Custom render | apps/studio/tests/lib/custom-render.tsx |
| MSW mock setup | apps/studio/tests/lib/msw.ts (addAPIMock) |
| Test README | apps/studio/tests/README.md |
| Vitest config | apps/studio/vitest.config.ts |
| Related skills | studio-e2e-tests (running E2E), vitest (API reference), vercel-composition-patterns (component architecture) |
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Expert guidance for systematic backtesting of trading strategies. Use when developing, testing, stress-testing, or validating quantitative trading strategies. Covers "beating ideas to death" methodology, parameter robustness testing, slippage modeling, bias prevention, and interpreting backtest results. Applicable when user asks about backtesting, strategy validation, robustness testing, avoiding overfitting, or systematic trading development.
Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.
Take supabase/studio-testing from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.