mcpbeat

Audithandoffdoc

sterlingcrispin/audithandoffdoc

Deep audit producing a handoff document to get another agent fully up to speed

693 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
201
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands --skill audithandoffdoc

The instruction itself

1 sections, as written by the author

Please perform a deep audit of our current task to produce a handoff document that gets another agent fully up to speed.

Deliverable:

Create a file named AUDIT_HANDOFF.md at the project root.

Document your current understanding of:

  • what we are building
  • why we are building it
  • the project's telos (ultimate purpose/end-state)
  • how we are approaching implementation
  • what has been completed so far
  • how we define and measure success
  • current hypotheses
  • what is true (with evidence) vs what is assumed
  • what might be wrong
  • highest-risk areas
  • what we just tried and the outcome
  • next hypothesis
  • open questions

Required Structure (use these exact section headers)

  • # Executive Summary
  • 5-10 bullets: current project state, trajectory, and key concerns.
  • # Product Vision and Telos
  • What we are building.
  • Why it matters.
  • Desired end-state if the project fully succeeds.
  • # Implementation Approach
  • Architecture and strategy.
  • Key technical decisions and tradeoffs.
  • Why this approach was chosen over alternatives.
  • # Progress So Far
  • Completed work.
  • In-progress work.
  • Deferred/not started work.
  • Include concrete references (files, PRs, commits, tests, docs) where possible.
  • # Success Metrics
  • Define primary and secondary metrics.
  • For each metric include: baseline, current value (if known), target, and measurement method.
  • # Hypotheses
  • Current main hypothesis.
  • Supporting sub-hypotheses.
  • What would confirm or falsify each one.
  • # Evidence vs Assumptions

Include a table with columns:

Claim | Type (Evidence/Assumption) | Source | Confidence (Low/Med/High) | Notes

  • # Failure Modes and Risk Register
  • What could be wrong.
  • Highest-risk areas (ranked by impact x likelihood).
  • Detection signals and mitigation options for each risk.
  • # Most Recent Experiment/Attempt
  • What was just tried.
  • Expected result.
  • Actual result.
  • Interpretation.
  • Artifacts (logs, test outputs, benchmark data, screenshots, etc.).

10. # Next Hypothesis and Immediate Plan

  • Next best hypothesis to test.
  • Why this is the highest-leverage next step.
  • Step-by-step plan for the next iteration.

11. # Open Questions

  • Unresolved technical, product, and operational questions.
  • For each: why it matters, blocking status, and who/what can resolve it.

Quality Bar

  • Clearly separate facts, inferences, and assumptions.
  • Prefer concrete evidence over narrative.
  • Cite sources directly (file paths, line refs, commands, outputs, tickets, PR links).
  • Be explicit about uncertainty and confidence.
  • Keep it concise but complete; optimize for fast onboarding and auditability.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take sterlingcrispin/audithandoffdoc from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.