Recipe Implement Skill for Claude

Execute Skill: llm-friendly-context before writing Agent prompts, handoffs, or generated artifacts.

Execute Skill: subagents-orchestration-guide before making workflow decisions, invoking agents, or resolving findings.

Context: Full-cycle implementation management (Requirements Analysis → Design → Planning → Implementation → Quality Assurance)

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)

Local authority gate: Make this recipe's workflow decisions and validate each returned result directly; delegate semantic deliverable production to the named specialist.

Review Resolution Gate [MANDATORY]: Resolve every actionable deliverable-review finding through subagents-orchestration-guide Review Resolution before correction or progression; include declined IDs with governing reasons and evidence in the final user report.

Before the first finding disposition, read references/review-resolution.md from the loaded subagents-orchestration-guide skill.

Execution Protocol:

• Invoke named specialists for deliverable production — pass deliverable paths between them and validate their results (see subagents-orchestration-guide "Orchestrator Execution Boundary")
• Follow subagents-orchestration-guide skill flows exactly:
• Execute one step at a time in the defined flow (Large/Medium/Small scale)
• When flow specifies "Execute document-reviewer" → Execute it immediately
• Stop at every [Stop: ...] marker → Use AskUserQuestion for confirmation and wait for approval before proceeding
• Enter autonomous mode only after "batch approval for entire implementation phase"

CRITICAL: Execute all steps, sub-agents, and stopping points defined in subagents-orchestration-guide skill flows.

Execution Decision Flow

1. Current Situation Assessment

Instruction Content: $ARGUMENTS

Assess the current situation:

| Situation Pattern | Decision Criteria | Next Action |

|------------------|------------------|-------------|

| New Requirements | No existing work, new feature/fix request | Start with requirement-analyzer |

| Flow Continuation | Existing docs/tasks present, continuation directive | Identify next step in sub-agents.md flow |

| Quality Errors | Error detection, test failures, build errors | Execute quality-fixer |

| Ambiguous | Intent unclear, multiple interpretations possible | Confirm with user |

2. Progress Verification for Continuation

When continuing existing flow, verify:

• Latest artifacts (PRD/ADR/Design Doc/Work Plan/Tasks)
• Current phase position (Requirements/Design/Planning/Implementation/QA)
• Identify next step in subagents-orchestration-guide skill corresponding flow

3. Next Action Execution

MANDATORY subagents-orchestration-guide skill reference:

• Verify scale-based flow (Large/Medium/Small scale)
• Confirm autonomous execution mode conditions
• Recognize mandatory stopping points
• Invoke next sub-agent defined in flow

After requirement-analyzer [Stop]

Execute Skill: requirement-convergence before running the hearing protocol.

Run the requirement-convergence hearing protocol on the returned convergence object before presenting anything else, using the analyzer's scope facts and cost band as the facts it presents.

When user responds to questions:

• If any convergence field is below ready → Re-execute requirement-analyzer with the hearing answers so the record is re-judged. Repeat until every field is ready or weak-but-explicit
• If response matches any scopeDependencies.question → Check impact for scale change
• If scale changes → Re-execute requirement-analyzer with updated context
• If confidence: "confirmed" or no scale change → Proceed to next step

4. Register All Flow Steps Using TaskCreate (MANDATORY)

After scale determination, use TaskCreate to register each design/planning step and the implementation, verification, cleanup, and report phases. Complete registration before invoking subagents; mark and advance the active phase with TaskUpdate.

Subagents Orchestration Guide Compliance Execution

Pre-execution Checklist (MANDATORY):

• [ ] Confirmed relevant subagents-orchestration-guide skill flow
• [ ] Identified current progress position
• [ ] Clarified next step
• [ ] Recognized stopping points
• [ ] codebase-analyzer included before Design Doc creation (Medium/Large scale)
• [ ] code-verifier included before document-reviewer for Design Doc review (Medium/Large scale)
• [ ] Environment check: Can I execute per-task commit cycle?
• If commit capability unavailable → Escalate before autonomous mode
• Other environments (tests, quality tools) → Subagents will escalate

Required Flow Compliance:

• Run quality-fixer before every commit
• Obtain user approval before Edit/Write/MultiEdit outside autonomous mode

Scope Boundary for Subagents

Append the following block to every subagent prompt invoked from this recipe:

Scope boundary for subagents:
Operate within the task scope and referenced files in the prompt.
Use loaded skills to execute that scope.
Escalate when the required fix or investigation falls outside that scope.

Mandatory Orchestrator Responsibilities

Task Execution Quality Cycle (4-Step Cycle per Task)

Per-task cycle (complete each task before starting next):

• Agent tool (subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:task-executor") → Record the current HEAD as diffBase, pass the task file path in the prompt, and receive the structured response
• Check task-executor response:
• status: escalation_needed or blocked → Escalate to user
• requiresTestReview is true → Invoke integration-test-reviewer with diffBase, changed integration/E2E paths, taskFile, prompt-only claims, and mutationEvidence
• approved → Proceed to step 3
• blocked → Escalate to user
• needs_revision → Apply the Review Resolution Gate
• one or more apply findings → Return to step 1 with those findings, then re-review with prior_feedback
• every actionable finding is decline → Proceed to step 3
• any unresolved user_decision_required finding → Escalate to user
• Otherwise → Proceed to step 3
• quality-fixer → Pass task_file, upstream mutationEvidence, and qualityCommand when available (caller first, otherwise current task); run quality checks and fixes
• stub_detected → Return to step 1 with incompleteImplementations[] details
• blocked → Escalate to user
• approved → Proceed to step 4
• git commit → Execute with Bash (on approved)

Post-Implementation Verification (After All Tasks Complete)

Resolve the Work Plan's readable Design Doc, or the Work Plan itself when no Design Doc exists; missing input blocks verification.

Emit these Agent calls in one assistant message, then await both:

• code-verifier (subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:code-verifier") → resolved doc_type, document_path, and code_paths from git diff --name-only main...HEAD
• security-reviewer (subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:security-reviewer") → the same typed governingDocuments and implementationFiles

Apply subagents-orchestration-guide's Post-Implementation Verification pass/fail and fix/re-run rules. Present the unified report; proceed to Final Cleanup after both pass.

Final Cleanup

Before the completion report, delete the implementation task files this recipe consumed. Their work is committed; docs/plans/ is ephemeral working state and is not retained between recipe runs:

• Delete every file matching docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-task-*.md (the {plan-name} derived from the work plan path used in this run)
• Delete every file matching docs/plans/tasks/{plan-name}-phase*-completion.md (the per-phase completion files generated by task-decomposer)
• Delete the corresponding docs/plans/tasks/_overview-{plan-name}.md if present
• Preserve the work plan itself (docs/plans/{plan-name}.md) — the user decides whether to delete it after final review

If task files cannot be deleted (filesystem error), report the failure but do not block the completion report.

Test Information Communication

After acceptance-test-generator execution, when invoking work-planner (subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:work-planner"), communicate:

• Generated integration test file path (from generatedFiles.integration)
• Generated fixture-e2e test file path or null (from generatedFiles.fixtureE2e)
• Generated service-integration-e2e test file path or null (from generatedFiles.serviceE2e)
• Per-lane E2E absence reason (from e2eAbsenceReason.fixtureE2e and e2eAbsenceReason.serviceE2e, when each lane is null)

Execution Method

Deliverable production is executed through the specialist selected by subagents-orchestration-guide; workflow decisions and returned-result validation remain with the orchestrator.