mcpbeat

Report Card

serhiikorniienko/report-card

Render a finished BS report as a self-contained HTML page — score hero, filterable claims, readable on a phone, prints to a clean PDF. Use when the user wants to open, share, print, or show a report to someone who is not going to read a markdown table, or asks for "the HTML version", "something I can send", "a shareable page", or "make this readable".

11k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
101
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/SerhiiKorniienko/bullshit-detector --skill report-card

What comes with it

38 301 bytes besides the instruction
scripts/render_report.py

The instruction itself

8 sections, as written by the author

report-card

Turn bs-report-<slug>-<date>.md into one HTML file anybody can open.

The markdown is the artifact and stays the artifact — it is what tally.py checks, what gets

diffed against a later run, and what gets committed. This skill adds a reader-facing view of

that same file. It renders; it never edits, recounts, or adds. Every number on the page is copied

from the markdown verbatim.

Why this exists

A BS report is a five-column claims table. On a laptop that is fine. On a phone — which is where a

shared link is actually opened — the Evidence column is unreadable, and the reader's first

question ("what's wrong with it?") means scrolling twenty rows to find the two that matter.

Usage

uv run <this-skill-dir>/scripts/render_report.py ~/.bullshit-detector/reports/<YYYY>/bs-report-<slug>-<date>.md

Writes bs-report-<slug>-<date>.html beside the markdown. -o <path> puts it elsewhere. No install

step, no dependencies — the script is stdlib-only, runs under plain python3 as well as uv run,

and the page it produces makes no network requests. That combination is what lets it work in a

code-execution sandbox, where the HTML is the only thing the user can take away.

  • --open shows the page in the default browser. Where there is no browser — a sandbox, a headless

host — it says so and the file is still written. It is skipped when the page already exists,

because re-rendering is normal (the run line gets finalised after a first pass) and every open

spawns another tab — three consecutive real runs left the user with two. The file updates in

place; reload the tab you have.

  • --reopen opens even when the page existed — for picking a report back up in a later session. Never treat that as a failure.
  • --quiet prints only the output path, for scripting.

The handoff block

By default the script prints the block that ends a detector run:

BS score 4/10 · Mostly fine
  the macro data is real and mostly checks out; the narrative glue is crypto-Twitter.
Tally: 35 claims extracted, 34 individually source-checked — 22 confirmed, 5 plausible,
  5 misleading, 2 false. 1 not checked.
run: 16m30s, searches 35, tools 65, coverage 1, per claim 29s

markdown  file:///Users/…/bs-report-japans-money-is-collapsing-2026-07-31.md
page      file:///Users/…/bs-report-japans-money-is-collapsing-2026-07-31.html
          opened in your browser

Paste it; don't rebuild it. Every figure came out of the report that tally.py had just

recounted. A summary retyped from memory of what you wrote is wrong in the direction that flatters

the run — the same failure mode as the tally and the search count, one level up.

The paths are file:// URLs on purpose: terminals linkify a bare URL, so both files are one

cmd-click from opening. Don't shorten them to ~/… or hide them behind link text.

The compliance gate

Before rendering, the script runs the report through the detector's tally.py and **refuses to

render a report that fails it**:

REFUSED: bs-report-our-solar-system-2026-07-31.md does not pass tally.py.
  ✗ run line: 25 claims individually source-checked from 21 searches — every claim
    carrying a verdict needs its own search, so this reports more verification than
    was performed

Exit 3. This is the point of the gate: a page this presentable, built from a report that fails its

own arithmetic, launders a broken report into something that looks authoritative. Fix what the gate

names and re-run.

  • --force renders anyway and prints the failures as warnings.
  • --no-check skips the gate — for markdown that isn't a BS report.
  • --tally <path> or $BULLSHIT_DETECTOR_TALLY if it can't be found automatically.

If tally.py isn't installed at all — this skill can be installed without the detector — the

script warns and renders. A missing validator is a reason to warn, not a reason to stop someone

viewing a report they already have.

--og-image <absolute-url> adds a link-preview image. Only useful once the page is hosted

somewhere; skip it for local files.

Then tell the user the path and that it opens in any browser. On macOS open <path> does it.

What the page adds over the markdown

  • Score hero — the number at the size it deserves, coloured by the RUBRIC band (Solid /

Mostly fine / Hype-heavy / Mostly bullshit / Fabricated), with the one-line verdict beside it.

  • Verdict filter chipsProblems shows only ❌ and 🟠. Load-bearing only hides the

incidental table. This is the whole reason a non-technical reader gets through the report.

  • Claims as cards under 900px, as a table above it. Same rows, same order, same text.
  • Print stylesheet — Cmd-P gives a clean PDF with the URLs printed after each link.

Filters are deliberately ignored when printing: a filtered PDF is a report that quietly dropped

rows, which is the one artifact this tool must never produce.

  • Link-preview tags — a pasted link shows <title> — N/10 and the verdict line instead of a

bare URL.

Rules

  • Render, don't re-report. If a number looks wrong, the markdown is wrong — fix it there and

re-render. Never correct it in the HTML.

  • The markdown is still the source of truth. Say so when handing over the file; the HTML is a

view, and only the markdown is what tally.py validated.

  • Don't reach for --force to make a refusal go away. The gate is naming a real defect in the

report. Rendering past it produces a page that looks more trustworthy than the thing behind it,

which is the failure this whole tool exists to catch.

  • Don't publish anything without being asked. People point this tool at unpublished drafts,

internal docs and things they were sent in confidence. Writing a local file is not publishing;

putting it on the internet is a separate decision that belongs to the user, per report.

  • The renderer is deliberately lenient — a report missing its score or version stamp still renders,

with a note on the page saying which fields were missing. That is a viewer's job. tally.py is

the strict one, and the two must not swap roles.

Known limits

  • The claims table must keep its | # | Claim | Type | Verdict | Evidence | shape — the # column

is how the renderer tells a claims table from any other table, and the verdict glyph is read from

its own cell, never from anywhere else in the row.

  • Reports in any language render fine (system fonts, no bundled webfont).
  • Images are not generated here. The social carousel lives in

share.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take serhiikorniienko/report-card from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.