Orchestrate coding work by delegating well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI (grok) running headlessly, while the coding assistant plans, writes the task specs, reviews every diff, and owns the result. Use when user says: 'use grok', 'grok build', 'delegate to grok', 'have grok implement', 'have grok execute', 'have grok build', 'send to grok', 'execute this plan with grok'. Executes a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task, or ad-hoc tasks with an inline spec.
npx skills add https://github.com/sanjay3290/ai-skills --skill grok-build
The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs,
dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result.
Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: references/cli.md.
| Delegate to Grok | Keep with the orchestrator |
|---|---|
| Plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria | Ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions |
| Boilerplate, scaffolding, CRUD | Deep cross-file debugging |
| Mechanical refactors | Security-sensitive code |
| Test writing from clear specs | Anything touching production infrastructure |
| UI components from mockups/specs | Tasks where writing the spec ≈ doing the work |
When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.
grok update --check --json — if updateAvailable is true, run grok update andconfirm with grok --version.
grok models — if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to rungrok login.
OUTSIDE the target repo — the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS
temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context:
no one-liner prompts, ever.
mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs", then write task.md there.New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs",then write task.md there.
post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (__pycache__, dist/,
etc.); if they show in git status, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your
concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree.
POSIX:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> \
--output-format json \
--always-approve \
--max-turns 30 \
--cwd <repo>
Windows (PowerShell) — backtick line-continuation:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> `
--output-format json `
--always-approve `
--max-turns 30 `
--cwd <repo>
Parse the JSON output and save sessionId. (--always-approve is required for
headless runs — --permission-mode acceptEdits silently cancels edits with no
interactive approver. See references/cli.md.) For a high-stakes task, add --check
so Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency).
git diff -- <files from the spec> to skip artifact noise):does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions?
--always-approve --output-format json`. Max 2 fix-up rounds. Still failing →
revert Grok's changes (git checkout -- .; git clean -fd for new files), do the
task yourself, and tell the user Grok couldn't complete it.
# Task: <one-line title>
## Context
- Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>
- Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>
## Files
- Modify: <path>
- Create: <path>
## Task
<precise description of the change>
## Constraints
- Do not modify any files other than those listed above.
- <other constraints>
## Acceptance criteria
- `<exact command>` <expected result>
- [ ] → - [x]) as each task lands and passesthe review gate.
otherwise stay sequential.
Only when a plan explicitly marks tasks independent: dispatch each with
--worktree=<task-slug>, run concurrently, then review and merge one worktree at a
time through the same review gate. Merge conflicts usually eat the savings — prefer
sequential.
| Failure | Action |
|---|---|
| stopReason: "Cancelled", empty text, no diff | Missing --always-approve — retry with it |
| CLI error / timeout | Retry once; then do the task yourself and note the fallback |
| Auth expired | Stop; ask the user to run grok login |
| 2 fix-up rounds exhausted | Revert Grok's diff; the orchestrator finishes the task |
| Dirty tree at dispatch | Refuse; commit/stash first |
Default grok-4.5. Add -m grok-composer-2.5-fast only for trivial mechanical tasks.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take sanjay3290/grok-build from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.