mcpbeat Sign in

AI Evals Agent Skill

Help users build robust infrastructure for measuring, monitoring, and iterating on AI product performance using human, code-based, and LLM-as-a-judge methodologies.

21k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
3
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
1215
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/RefoundAI/lenny-skills --skill ai-evals

What comes with it

76 793 bytes besides the instruction
references/artifacts.md
references/guest-insights.md

The instruction itself

12 sections, as written by the author

AI Evaluation Strategy

Move beyond vibe checks to systematic, empirical measurement of AI product quality and reliability.

Help the user with ai evaluation strategy using insights from 11 guests and posts across Lenny's Podcast and Newsletter.

How to Help

  • Identify Failure Modes - Help the user conduct error analysis on real traces to find where the system specifically breaks.
  • Select Eval Methods - Recommend the right mix of human, code, and LLM judges based on the specific technical use case.
  • Build Gold Sets - Assist in curating a reference dataset of high-quality examples to act as the ground truth for your application.
  • Operationalize - Guide the user in integrating these evaluations into a CI/CD pipeline for continuous quality improvement.

Core Principles

Automate the Value Chain

Brendan Foody: "I think that for enterprises especially, the core way to think about it is how can they build a test or systematic way to measure how well AI automates their core value chain? So if it's an architecture firm that's producing these architecture diagrams of what they provide to their end customer, how can they effectively measure that? And each company has its own value chain or maybe a handful of them if it's a multi-product company."

Identify the core deliverables unique to your business and develop systematic tests to measure how accurately AI can replicate those specific tasks.

Prioritize Subjective Excellence

Edwin Chen: "We are looking for a Nobel Prize-winning poetry. Is this poetry unique? Is it full of subtle imagery? Does it surprise you and target your heart? Does it teach you something about the nature of moonlight?"

True data quality is defined by deep, subjective human excellence, such as emotional resonance and uniqueness, rather than superficial binary checks.

Eliminate Vibe Checks

Hamel Husain & Shreya Shankar: "Evals help you create metrics that you can use to measure how your application is doing and kind of give you a way to improve your application with confidence. That you have a feedback signal in which to iterate against."

Create systematic metrics to track application quality over time, allowing teams to iterate on prompts or models with the same confidence as traditional software.

Structured Judge Logic

From "Beyond vibe checks: A PM’s complete guide to evals": "Clearly articulating what you want your judge-LLM to measure isn’t just a step in the process; it’s the difference between a mediocre AI and one that consistently delights users. Building these writing skills requires practice and attention."

Write effective automated evaluations by using a structured prompt that defines the role, data, success criteria, and specific labels for the judge.

Templates & Frameworks

  • LLM-as-a-Judge Playbook (Building eval systems that improve your AI product) - A systematic three-step process for building, validating, and measuring an LLM judge that provides trusted binary pass/fail metrics for subjective AI quality as
  • Three Eval Approaches (Human, Code-based, LLM-based) (Beyond vibe checks: A PM’s complete guide to evals) - A decision framework for choosing the right eval approach based on your use case, with pros and cons for each.
  • The Eval Formula (Four-Part Structure) (Beyond vibe checks: A PM’s complete guide to evals) - A four-part formula for writing effective LLM-based eval prompts that any PM can use to construct judge-LLM prompts.
  • Open Coding and Axial Coding for AI Error Analysis (Building eval systems that improve your AI product) - A qualitative research methodology adapted for AI product evaluation, used to discover and categorize failure modes from user interaction data.
  • RAG Evaluation Framework (Retriever + Generator) (Building eval systems that improve your AI product) - A two-part evaluation approach for RAG systems that separately assesses the retriever and generator components with specific metrics for each.
  • AI Eval Improvement Flywheel (Building eval systems that improve your AI product) - The closed-loop process that uses CI safety nets and production discovery engines together to create continuous AI product improvement.
  • Reference Dataset Structure (Why your AI product needs a different development lifecycle) - A template for building the initial reference dataset (20-100 examples) to break the cold start and provide a baseline for AI system evaluation.
  • Transition Failure Matrix for Agentic Workflows (Building eval systems that improve your AI product) - A diagnostic tool for pinpointing exactly which step in an agent's multi-step workflow breaks down, enabling data-driven debugging.

See references/artifacts.md for the full list with details.

Questions to Help Users

  • "What are the top 3 to 5 failure modes your users are currently experiencing in production?"
  • "Do you have a single domain expert or benevolent dictator who defines what quality looks like for this feature?"
  • "What percentage of your current evaluation process is manual versus automated?"
  • "Is your system non-determinism primarily occurring in the retrieval or the generation phase?"
  • "Have you established a golden dataset of at least 20 to 50 human-labeled examples yet?"
  • "How do you currently measure the performance delta when you switch models or change a system prompt?"

Common Mistakes to Flag

  • Relying on vibe checks - Manual and anecdotal testing leads to inconsistent quality and hidden regressions that damage user trust over time.
  • Obsessing over prompt engineering - Focusing solely on prompts while neglecting the underlying evaluation system prevents teams from scaling or hill-climbing systematically.
  • Using generic metrics for product reporting - Off-the-shelf scores are useful for filtering but often fail to capture the specific value or failures unique to your business logic.
  • Ignoring component isolation - Failing to evaluate the retriever separately from the generator in RAG systems makes it impossible to know which part of the stack is failing.
  • Neglecting non-determinism - Failing to account for the stochastic nature of LLMs leads to false confidence in results that may not repeat in production.

Deep Dive

For all 33 sourced insights from 11 guests, see references/guest-insights.md

  • Ai Product Strategy
  • Ai Native Ux

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Azure Kubernetes Automatic Readiness
by microsoft
vendor ×3

Assess Kubernetes workloads and cluster configuration for AKS Automatic compatibility. Identifies incompatibilities, generates fixes, and guides migration from AKS Standard to AKS Automatic. WHEN: migrate to AKS Automatic, check AKS Automatic readiness, validate manifests for Automatic, assess cluster for Automatic compatibility, fix deployment for Automatic compatibility, identify AKS Automatic migration blockers, is my cluster ready for AKS Automatic.

13k tokens
Capacity
by microsoft
vendor ×3

Discovers available Azure OpenAI model capacity across regions and projects. Analyzes quota limits, compares availability, and recommends optimal deployment locations based on capacity requirements. USE FOR: find capacity, check quota, where can I deploy, capacity discovery, best region for capacity, multi-project capacity search, quota analysis, model availability, region comparison, check TPM availability. DO NOT USE FOR: actual deployment (hand off to preset or customize after discovery), quota increase requests (direct user to Azure Portal), listing existing deployments.

6k tokens scripts
Customize
by microsoft
vendor ×3

Interactive guided deployment flow for Azure OpenAI models with full customization control. Step-by-step selection of model version, SKU (GlobalStandard/Standard/ProvisionedManaged), capacity, RAI policy (content filter), and advanced options (dynamic quota, priority processing, spillover). USE FOR: custom deployment, customize model deployment, choose version, select SKU, set capacity, configure content filter, RAI policy, deployment options, detailed deployment, advanced deployment, PTU deployment, provisioned throughput. DO NOT USE FOR: quick deployment to optimal region (use preset).

8k tokens
Deploy Model
by microsoft
vendor ×3

Unified Azure OpenAI model deployment skill with intelligent intent-based routing. Handles quick preset deployments, fully customized deployments (version/SKU/capacity/RAI policy), and capacity discovery across regions and projects. USE FOR: deploy model, deploy gpt, create deployment, model deployment, deploy openai model, set up model, provision model, find capacity, check model availability, where can I deploy, best region for model, capacity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: listing existing deployments (use foundry_models_deployments_list MCP tool), deleting deployments, agent creation (use agent/create), project creation (use project/create).

26k tokens scripts
Preset
by microsoft
vendor ×3

Intelligently deploys Azure OpenAI models to optimal regions by analyzing capacity across all available regions. Automatically checks current region first and shows alternatives if needed. USE FOR: quick deployment, optimal region, best region, automatic region selection, fast setup, multi-region capacity check, high availability deployment, deploy to best location. DO NOT USE FOR: custom SKU selection (use customize), specific version selection (use customize), custom capacity configuration (use customize), PTU deployments (use customize).

9k tokens
Lamindb
by christophacham
×3

This skill should be used when working with LaminDB, an open-source data framework for biology that makes data queryable, traceable, reproducible, and FAIR. Use when managing biological datasets (scRNA-seq, spatial, flow cytometry, etc.), tracking computational workflows, curating and validating data with biological ontologies, building data lakehouses, or ensuring data lineage and reproducibility in biological research. Covers data management, annotation, ontologies (genes, cell types, diseases, tissues), schema validation, integrations with workflow managers (Nextflow, Snakemake) and MLOps platforms (W&B, MLflow), and deployment strategies.

22k tokens
Latchbio Integration
by christophacham
×3

Latch platform for bioinformatics workflows. Build pipelines with Latch SDK, @workflow/@task decorators, deploy serverless workflows, LatchFile/LatchDir, Nextflow/Snakemake integration.

12k tokens
Modal
by christophacham
×3

Run Python code in the cloud with serverless containers, GPUs, and autoscaling. Use when deploying ML models, running batch processing jobs, scheduling compute-intensive tasks, or serving APIs that require GPU acceleration or dynamic scaling.

17k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take refoundai/ai-evals from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.