Use when writing or editing Javadoc for Lettuce public API — new methods, classes, deprecations, or when a reviewer asks to fix or improve doc comments. Points to the full house ruleset in .agents/docs/javadoc.md (imperative method summaries, fixed tag order, @param/@return/@throws/@since/@deprecated house forms) and the rule that command-interface Javadoc is edited in the template, not the generated files. Trigger on "write javadoc for", "document this method", "add a deprecation notice", "fix the doc comment".
npx skills add https://github.com/redis/lettuce --skill writing-javadoc
The complete, authoritative ruleset is .agents/docs/javadoc.md —
read it before writing. This skill is the operating checklist; the doc wins on any
detail.
src/main/java/io/lettuce/core/api/{sync,async,reactive}/ are generated
(@generated marker). Edit the Javadoc in the template at
src/main/templates/io/lettuce/core/api/<Group>Commands.java, not the generated
file — the template comment feeds every flavor. See architecture.md.
errors, nullability) — never implementation details or refactor rationale.
noun phrase for types. Not "This method…". Ends in a clean period.
@param → @return → @throws → @author → @since → @see→ @deprecated.
@param for every parameter (type params <K>/<V> first); statenullability with the house phrases must not be {@code null}. / can be {@code null}.
@return for non-void; describe the value and its meaningful states, not thetype.
@since is a bare version — @since 7.7 (see .agents/docs/javadoc.md for derivingthe version from the build).
@deprecated — keep the @Deprecated annotation and the tag in sync; houseform: `@deprecated since <version>, use {@link Replacement} instead; scheduled for
removal in a future major release.`
@author on types only — the *maintainer's* name (an agent must not inventone); don't reorder existing authors.
{@code null} for literals; {@link} only to types resolvable on thecompile classpath (else {@code TypeName}).
Match the surrounding file, and consult .agents/docs/javadoc.md for any subtle case
rather than inventing a rule. Javadoc lint is off in the build (<doclint>none</doclint>),
so review is the only check — get it right by hand.
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
| Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Official Opentrons Protocol API for OT-2 and Flex robots. Use when writing protocols specifically for Opentrons hardware with full access to Protocol API v2 features. Best for production Opentrons protocols, official API compatibility. For multi-vendor automation or broader equipment control use pylabrobot.
Take redis/writing-javadoc from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.