Evaluate, select, and contract with vendors and SaaS tools. Use this skill when comparing alternatives, running an RFP, scoring vendors against criteria, negotiating contracts, planning a switch, or assessing a vendor's risk. Triggers on vendor evaluation, RFP, vendor selection, build vs buy, SaaS evaluation, vendor scorecard, vendor comparison, contract negotiation, vendor switch, procurement. Also triggers when a renewal is coming up or when a tool isn't meeting expectations.
npx skills add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills --skill vendor-evaluation
Pick the right tool or service, negotiate fair terms, and avoid the lock-in traps. Stack-agnostic. Applies to SaaS, infrastructure providers, agencies, and any external dependency.
cost-optimization)A structured vendor evaluation. Skip phases at your peril.
Before looking at vendors, define what you actually need.
The temptation: skip this and start demoing. Vendors are happy to show off; you end up choosing what looks shiny rather than what fits.
Before evaluating vendors, decide whether you should build instead.
Build when:
Buy when:
Most teams over-build. The rule of thumb: buy unless there's a strong reason to build. Then question even that strong reason.
Cast a wider net than feels comfortable, then narrow.
Sources:
Cast wide first. Aim for 5-8 candidates. Then narrow to 2-4 finalists for deep evaluation.
Use a scorecard. Without one, you'll be swayed by demo theatrics or who has the friendliest sales rep.
Scorecard dimensions (weight by your situation):
Functional fit (40%): Does it do what you need? Edge cases handled? UX quality. Workflow fit.
Technical fit (15%): Integration with your stack. API quality and completeness. Data export and portability. Performance at your scale. Self-hosted, hybrid, or SaaS-only.
Operational fit (10%): Onboarding effort. Training and adoption. Documentation quality. Support quality (test by submitting a ticket). SLAs.
Security and compliance (10%): SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, etc., as applicable. Data residency. Encryption at rest and in transit. Access controls and audit logs. Penetration test results (ask). Subprocessors.
Vendor health (10%): Years in business. Funding and runway (or revenue if private). Customer base size and similar customers. Public references. Roadmap visibility.
Cost (10%): License or subscription cost. Implementation and onboarding cost. Training cost. Integration cost. Opportunity cost (in-house resource time). Switching cost (in case of failure).
Lock-in risk (5%): Data export quality. Standard formats vs proprietary. Migration paths to alternatives. Open standards alignment. Contract escape clauses.
Score each finalist 1-5 on each dimension. Multiply by weight. Sum.
The score isn't gospel. It surfaces the tradeoffs.
Most enterprise contracts are negotiable. Most aren't negotiated.
What's negotiable:
Common negotiation moves:
What to avoid:
Write a one-page brief: what we need, why, success criteria, constraints, stakeholders.
Honestly answer the build/buy question. Document the rationale.
Wider net first, narrowed via desk research:
Eliminate obvious misfits. Land on 2-4 finalists.
For each finalist:
Don't be charmed by the polished demo. Try it with your real workflow.
Critical for any vendor handling sensitive data:
This can take weeks for enterprise vendors. Start early.
Apply the scorecard. Do this collaboratively with stakeholders.
The scoring conversation matters more than the final number. It surfaces disagreement (one person scored UX 5, another scored 2: why?).
With the apparent winner:
Contract signing is the start, not the end. Plan:
Record:
This is gold for the next renewal or the next similar evaluation.
Skipping the needs definition. Demoing first. Buying what's shiny. Realizing 6 months in that the actual need wasn't met.
Single-source decisions. Talking to one vendor; deciding. No comparison. Probably overpaying or under-fitting.
Charisma-driven decisions. Buying based on the sales rep's likability. The product is what you'll use for years; the rep won't be there.
Reference calls that the vendor curated. Of course their references love them. Find references the vendor didn't suggest.
Glossing over security. Security review skipped because of timeline pressure. Then a breach. Slow down or accept the risk explicitly.
Demos that don't match the use case. Their default demo, not yours. Always do a use-case demo.
Trial that doesn't simulate real usage. A trial with synthetic data tells you the product works in synthetic conditions. Use real (or close to real) data.
Negotiating only on price. Terms, SLAs, and exit clauses matter more for long-term satisfaction than 5% price.
Auto-renewal without notice tracking. Renewal happens; rate goes up 15%. No one was watching. Track renewals; review with notice.
Lock-in without exit plan. Tightly integrating into a vendor's proprietary surface. When you want to leave, you can't. Plan exit at the start.
Multi-year contract for an unproven vendor. Save the multi-year for vendors you trust. New vendor: shorter term, evaluate after.
No internal champion. Tool selected; no one drives adoption. Tool sits unused. Identify the champion before signing.
Negotiating after a verbal commitment. "Yes, we want to buy" means they have less reason to negotiate. Keep options open until terms are settled.
Ignoring red flags in security review. Vendor's security responses are evasive or incomplete. Treat as a no.
Comparing apples to oranges. Vendors price differently (per user, per usage, flat). Build a comparable cost model at your scale.
A vendor evaluation document includes:
references/evaluation-rubric.md - Scoring template with weighted dimensions, 1-5 scale criteria for each dimension, and a worked vendor-comparison example.Interactive daily standup/meeting update generator. Use when user says 'daily', 'standup', 'scrum update', 'status update', 'what did I do yesterday', 'prepare for meeting', 'morning update', or 'team sync'. Pulls activity from GitHub, Jira, and Claude Code session history. Conducts 4-question interview (yesterday, today, blockers, discussion topics) and generates formatted Markdown update.
Start your day with a prioritized sales briefing. Works standalone when you tell me your meetings and priorities, supercharged when you connect your calendar, CRM, and email. Trigger with "morning briefing", "daily brief", "what's on my plate today", "prep my day", or "start my day".
Full ICP-to-leads pipeline. Describe your ideal customer in plain English and get a ranked table of enriched decision-maker leads with emails and phone numbers.
Analyze meeting notes to find action items and create Jira tasks for assigned work. When an agent needs to: (1) Create Jira tasks or tickets from meeting notes, (2) Extract or find action items from notes or Confluence pages, (3) Parse meeting notes for assigned tasks, or (4) Analyze notes and generate tasks for team members. Identifies assignees, looks up account IDs, and creates tasks with proper context.
When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," or "new user experience." For signup/registration optimization, see signup-flow-cro. For ongoing email sequences, see email-sequence.
Prepare for tomorrow''s meetings and tasks. Pulls calendar from Outlook via WorkIQ, cross-references open tasks and workspace context, classifies meetings, detects conflicts and day-fit issues, finds learning and deep-work slots, and generates a structured HTML prep file with productivity recommendations.
Design meeting rhythms, metric reporting, quarterly planning, and decision-making velocity for scaling companies. Use when decisions are slow, planning is broken, the company is growing but alignment is worse, or leadership meetings consume all time without producing decisions.
Add Google Calendar as an MCP tool (list calendars, list/search/create events, free/busy queries) using OneCLI-managed OAuth. Multi-calendar and multi-account supported. Mirrors /add-gmail-tool's stub pattern — no raw credentials ever reach the container; OneCLI injects real tokens at request time.
Take rampstackco/vendor-evaluation from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.