Capture and compare per-op activations between two TorchTitan runs to spot numerics divergence (eager vs aot_fx_trace, FSDP vs no-FSDP, before vs after a refactor). Use when the user wants to debug bitwise / numeric drift in training, or invokes /numerics_debugging.
npx skills add https://github.com/pytorch/torchtitan --skill numerics_debugging
Per-op activation capture + comparison toolkit. Captures activations on a
designated step via torch.utils._debug_mode.DebugMode, then diffs two
captures into an HTML report to surface numerics divergence between runs
that should agree (bitwise, or within float32 reduction-order noise).
Two pieces live in agent_tooling/numerics_debugging/:
activation_tracer.py — runtime capture, driven from Profiler byActivationCaptureProfiler. Output:
{dump_folder}/numerics/rank_{N}_activations.log.
compare_numerics.py — diffs two logs, produces an HTML report.agent_tooling/ sits outside the torchtitan package on purpose. Nothing
in core torchtitan or graph_trainer references it; an agent must edit
torchtitan to wire it in before a capture run, and revert the edits when
done (they don't belong on main).
> The two runs being compared must use the same dtype and seed. The
> matcher keys on shape + float64 L1 norm; a precision change (bf16 vs
> fp32) makes every row diverge and the matcher degrades to the
> structural-only stats pass.
Profiler (andgraph_trainer if you're capturing the traced path). Full patch set:
references/patching.md.
./run_train.sh \
--dump_folder ./outputs/run_A \
--training.steps 2 \
--profiler.dump_numerics \
--profiler.profile_freq 2 \
--debug.seed 42 \
--debug.deterministic \
--training.mixed_precision_param float32
The capture step is profile_freq. With profile_freq=2 and
training.steps=2, step 1 warms up and step 2 is the snapshot. Capture
adds ~10–40% memory only on the capture step (stats are computed inline
in float64; tensors aren't held).
python -m agent_tooling.numerics_debugging.compare_numerics \
outputs/run_A/numerics/rank_0_activations.log \
outputs/run_B/numerics/rank_0_activations.log \
--name1 run_A --name2 run_B \
-o diff.html
Open diff.html. Each row pairs one op from each run; cells turn red
when a stat diverges; the "Match method" chip shows which of the four
matching passes (override / exact key / fuzzy key / stats) paired the
row.
Excluded ops, numel / dtype filter, hash function, the manual-override
file format, and HTML appearance are all tunable. See
references/customization.md, which also
catalogs the common eager-vs-traced mismatch patterns (AC-recompute FQN
drift, per-layer counter shifts, collective renaming) you'll see in the
diff and how to express them as overrides.
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C
Write idiomatic Ruby code with metaprogramming, Rails patterns, and performance optimization. Specializes in Ruby on Rails, gem development, and testing frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for Ruby refactoring, optimization, or complex Ruby features.
Use when working with tdd workflows tdd refactor
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.
Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments).
Refactor high-complexity React components in Dify frontend. Use when `pnpm analyze-component --json` shows complexity > 50 or lineCount > 300, when the user asks for code splitting, hook extraction, or complexity reduction, or when `pnpm analyze-component` warns to refactor before testing; avoid for simple/well-structured components, third-party wrappers, or when the user explicitly wants testing without refactoring.
Write modern C# code with advanced features like records, pattern matching, and async/await. Optimizes .NET applications, implements enterprise patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for C# refactoring, performance optimization, or complex .NET solutions.
Take pytorch/numerics_debugging from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.