Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep.\nTRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).
npx skills add https://github.com/PostHog/skills --skill creating-replay-vision-scanners
A scanner is a standing LLM probe over session recordings. Once created and enabled, it runs on a
Temporal schedule that sweeps every 5 minutes, applying its prompt to each new matching recording and
recording the result as an observation (a queryable $recording_observed event). Each observation counts
against a monthly org quota (a fixed number of observations per calendar month).
That schedule is exactly why creation needs a gut-check: a scanner with a permissive query and full sampling
starts consuming quota automatically and can drain the whole month's budget within its first few sweeps.
Creation itself does not check quota — that protection only kicks in at observation time, by which point
the budget may already be gone.
Never create an enabled scanner blind. Estimate its volume, check remaining quota, and — when the projected
volume is a meaningful fraction of what's left — show the user the numbers and get confirmation before
creating. This is the heart of the skill; the rest is supporting detail.
Pick a scanner_type and write its scanner_config. Every type needs a prompt; the rest is type-specific:
| Type | What it produces | scanner_config shape |
| ------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| monitor | Open-ended observation against a prompt (e.g. "flag rage clicks") | {"prompt": "..."} |
| classifier | Assigns tags from a fixed label set | {"prompt": "...", "tags": ["tag-a", "tag-b"]} — tags needs ≥1 entry; optional "multi_label": true, "allow_freeform_tags": false |
| scorer | Numeric score on a rubric | {"prompt": "...", "scale": {"min": 1, "max": 5, "label": "frustration"}} — min < max; label optional |
| summarizer | Free-text summary; optional facet embeddings for search | {"prompt": "..."}; optional "length": "short" \| "medium" \| "long" (default "medium"), "emits_embeddings": false |
scanner_type is locked after creation — to change it you delete and recreate, so confirm the type is
right up front, and get the scanner_config shape right (a wrong shape is a create error, not a silent
default).
If the user's intent makes the type and prompt obvious, just proceed — don't interrogate them.
The query is a RecordingsQuery shape that selects which recordings the scanner watches. date_from and
date_to are ignored (the schedule controls time), so don't bother setting them. Narrow the query to the
sessions that actually matter — by event, URL, person property, duration, etc. A narrow query is the single
biggest lever on cost.
sampling_rate (0..1, default 1.0) is a random downsample applied _after_ the query matches. Lower it to
trade coverage for budget.
Before creating, run both checks and reason about them together:
vision-scanners-estimate-create with the proposed query + sampling_rate.It returns matched_sessions_in_window, the window_days measured, and
estimated_observations_per_month.
vision-quota-retrieve for remaining and exhausted against the org's monthlymonthly_quota.
Then decide:
estimated_observations_per_month comfortably fits within remaining, proceed.remaining, stop and tell the user the concrete numbers— e.g. "This scanner is projected to produce ~X observations/month; you have Y of Z left this month." —
and confirm before creating, or suggest tightening the query or lowering sampling_rate first.
exhausted, say so — a new enabled scanner won't produce anything until the quotaresets, and its observations will be silently skipped.
Confirmation here is a conversation step, not an API capability — surface the trade-off and let the user
choose. When the projected volume is clearly small relative to the budget, you don't need to ask.
Call vision-scanners-create. Minimal example:
{
"name": "Rage click monitor",
"scanner_type": "monitor",
"scanner_config": { "prompt": "Flag sessions where the user repeatedly clicks the same element in frustration." },
"query": { "kind": "RecordingsQuery", "events": [{ "id": "$rageclick", "type": "events" }] },
"sampling_rate": 1.0,
"model": "gemini-3-flash-preview",
"enabled": true
}
name must be unique within the team. Set enabled: false if the user wants to create it paused (no
schedule, no quota consumption) and turn it on later.
them with vision-scanners-observations-list for one scanner over time, or vision-observations-list
(requires session_id) for every scanner's findings on a single session. To dig into a recording, hand off
to the investigating-replay skill.
vision-scanners-update is a partial update — send only changed fields. **Re-run the Step 3 gut-check
whenever you widen scope**: a broader query or a higher sampling_rate raises the sweep volume just like a
fresh broad scanner would. Toggling enabled, tweaking the prompt, or narrowing the query don't need a
re-estimate. Editing config bumps scanner_version; past observations keep a snapshot of the old config.
failed or ineligible one — is a no-op and won't produce a fresh scan.
ineligible (e.g. too_short, no_recording) — a terminalnon-error outcome. Check error_reason when triaging why a scanner produced nothing.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
Replace with description of the skill and when Claude should use it.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
This skill should be used when the user wants to "create a skill", "add a skill to plugin", "write a new skill", "improve skill description", "organize skill content", or needs guidance on skill structure, progressive disclosure, or skill development best practices for Claude Code plugins.
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Take posthog/creating-replay-vision-scanners from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.