posthog/code-merging-prs
Merge a PR into main through the Trunk merge queue and babysit it until it lands. Enqueue with a "/trunk merge" comment, then poll the "Trunk Merge Queue" check run and the PR state until it is MERGED or FAILED, reporting the Trunk bot's failure reason if the PR is kicked out. Use when asked to merge a PR, "merge when ready", "land it", "ship it", or to babysit/watch a PR through the queue. Never use `gh pr merge` in this repo -- the queue is the only path into main.
npx skills add https://github.com/PostHog/code --skill merging-prs
Merges into main go exclusively through the Trunk merge
queue. gh pr merge and the GitHub merge button are blocked by branch ruleset.
To merge, you enqueue the PR with a comment, then watch it until Trunk lands it.
When a developer says "merge this PR", "merge it when it's ready", "land it",
"ship it", or "babysit this PR", do the full loop below — enqueue and watch
to completion, reporting the outcome.
<n> below is the PR number. Resolve the repo slug once if you need it:
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner).
gh pr view <n> --json state,isDraft,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup
gh pr ready <n> before continuing. Don't un-draft silently.
statusCheckRollup) → the queue will just rejectit. Report which checks are red and stop; fix them first. Pending checks
are fine — the queue waits for them.
reviewDecision empty or REVIEW_REQUIRED) → fine,enqueue anyway. See below.
mergeable == "CONFLICTING") → report and stop; rebase first.Enqueueing before approval is safe, and is the closest thing this repo has to
auto-merge. A submitted PR sits in Trunk's Queued state until GitHub's branch
protection on main is satisfied — one approving review, code-owner review, and
the required checks (build, quality, unit-test, integration-test,
typecheck) — and Trunk merges it once they land. Trunk is not a bypass actor on
those rules, so it cannot merge an unapproved or red PR.
The catch: pushing new commits drops the PR from the queue. If review
feedback is likely, either wait for approval before enqueueing, or re-enqueue
with /trunk merge after each push.
gh pr comment <n> --body "/trunk merge"
Within ~2 minutes, confirm Trunk picked it up — a check run whose name starts
with Trunk Merge Queue should appear on the head commit:
SHA=$(gh pr view <n> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
gh api repos/$REPO/commits/$SHA/check-runs \
--jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | startswith("Trunk Merge Queue")) | {name, status, conclusion, details_url}'
If nothing appears after a couple of minutes, the developer may lack write
access or GitHub-comment commands may be disabled — report that and suggest the
trunk-merge-queue-submit label as a fallback.
Loop about every 60 seconds, up to ~45–60 minutes total. Each iteration:
gh pr view <n> --json state,mergedAt # MERGED -> success, stop
SHA=$(gh pr view <n> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
gh api repos/$REPO/commits/$SHA/check-runs \
--jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | startswith("Trunk Merge Queue")) | {status, conclusion, details_url}'
sleep 60
state == "MERGED" → done. Report success with the merge commit.status moves queued → in_progress → completed. Report eachtransition so the developer can follow along.
gh pr checks --watch: the queue runsCI on Trunk's own draft/trunk-merge/** branch, so this PR's own checks don't
reflect the queue's testing.
Queued waiting on a human review, say so once and slow thecadence to ~5 minutes. Keep watching — the merge still has to be reported.
was still waiting on review, say that's why and offer to keep watching.
If the check run completes with conclusion == "failure" (or the PR drops out
of the queue), Trunk kicks the PR and its bot comments with the failing
workflow. Read the newest comments and report the reason:
gh pr view <n> --comments | tail -n 40
push, wait for the PR's own checks to go green, and re-enqueue once with
/trunk merge.
re-enqueue a red PR.
If the developer asks to stop the merge:
gh pr comment <n> --body "/trunk cancel"
Confirm the check run reports cancelled.
gh pr merge — it's blocked and it's not how this repo merges.from the queue.
to the developer.
Take posthog/code-merging-prs from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.