Brainstorm Experiments Existing Agent Skill
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Install
one command, takes just this skill from the repositorynpx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill brainstorm-experiments-existingThe instruction itself
4 sections, as written by the authorDesign Experiments (Existing Product)
Design low-effort experiments to test product assumptions before committing to full implementation.
Context
You are helping a product team design experiments for $ARGUMENTS. The team has a feature idea and assumptions that need validation.
If the user provides files (PRDs, assumption lists, designs), read them first.
Instructions
The user will describe their idea and assumptions. Work through these steps:
- Clarify the idea and assumptions: Confirm what the team wants to build and what they need to validate.
- Suggest experiments for each assumption. Consider methods like:
- First-click testing or task completion with a prototype
- Feature stubs or fake door tests
- Technical spikes
- A/B tests on production (with risk mitigation)
- Wizard of Oz approaches
- Survey-based validation (behavioral, not opinion-based)
- Key principles to follow:
- Measure actual behavior, not users' opinions
- Test responsibly — don't put users or the business at risk
- For production tests (e.g., A/B tests), explain risk mitigation strategies
- Aim for maximum validated learning with minimal effort
- For each experiment, specify:
- Assumption: What do we believe?
- Experiment: What exactly will we do to validate it?
- Metric: What will be measured?
- Success threshold: The expected value if we are right
Think step by step. Present experiments in a clear table or structured format. Save as markdown if substantial.
Further Reading
Other skills for the same job
different authors, same section of the catalogue
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
Prepares and structurally reviews readiness evidence for ISO management-system and laboratory-competence standards - ISO 13485 medical device QMS, ISO 14971 device risk management, ISO/IEC 17025 testing and calibration laboratories, and ISO 15189 medical laboratories. Use when organizing declared scope, controlled documents, risk-management files, scope of accreditation, traceability, CAPA, external-provider controls, or bounded local evidence manifests, and when separating ISO certification from laboratory accreditation, FDA QMSR inspection, CLIA certification, MDSAP, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries. Not for legal applicability, compliance, certification, or accreditation decisions; contains no clause text.
Sample-size and statistical power calculations for planning studies. Use whenever someone asks "how many subjects/samples/replicates do I need", wants an a priori power analysis, a minimum detectable effect (MDE), a power curve, or needs to justify a sample size for a grant, IRB protocol, or pre-registration. Covers closed-form power for t-tests, ANOVA, proportions, correlations, chi-square, and regression, plus simulation-based (Monte Carlo) power for designs with no formula — logistic/Poisson regression, mixed models, cluster-randomized trials, survival, and interactions. Use this skill even when the request only mentions an effect size, alpha, or "80% power" without saying "power analysis" explicitly. For laying out the study (randomization, blocking, factorial/DOE, crossover, sequential designs) use experimental-design; for analyzing data already collected and reporting it use statistical-analysis.
Universal QA checklist for generated scientific plots: overlapping labels, clipped text, missing axes/legends, overcrowded data, and cross-journal resolution/format guidance.
Senior Elite Software Engineer (15+) and Senior Product Designer. Full workflow with planning, architecture, TDD, clean code, and pixel-perfect UX validation.
Run PinchBench benchmarks to evaluate OpenClaw agent performance across real-world tasks. Use when testing model capabilities, comparing models, submitting benchmark results to the leaderboard, or checking how well your OpenClaw setup handles calendar, email, research, coding, and multi-step workflows.
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
Verify PowerToys behavior end-to-end with the winapp CLI across two scenarios: (A) a module's release checklist against the installed build; (B) PR validation — derive each PR's checklist from its description + diff, then drive it against the installed build (a merged/shipped PR, or a whole release/hotfix set) or by building + sideloading the module when the PR isn't in the build yet (unmerged or not-yet-released). Drive each item via UIA invoke / Named Events / settings.json edits / clipboard / GPO / SendInput, and emit a structured PASS / FAIL / BLOCKED verdict per item with evidence (FAIL distinguishes product defects from stale/ambiguous checklist items). Use when asked to verify a module checklist, validate a PR, sign off a release/hotfix's PRs, or QA installed/sideloaded PowerToys bits. Combines generic winapp ui mechanics (references/winapp-ui-testing.md) with PT-specific recipes, per-scenario playbooks (references/scenarios/), and the helper .ps1 files shipped with this skill.
How to use it
Take phuryn/brainstorm-experiments-existing from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.