mcpbeat

Triage Inbox

pedrohcgs/triage-inbox

Triage academic email and calendar (Gmail / Google Calendar via the session's MCP) into a prioritized digest plus a referee-obligations tracker — classifying referee requests, R&R and editor correspondence, co-author threads, seminar and conference invites, and grant/admin deadlines, and proposing a human-gated action for each (draft reply, calendar hold, scaffold a project, snooze). Use when user says "triage my inbox", "check my academic email", "what needs my attention this week", "go through my mail", or when run as a scheduled routine. NEVER auto-sends or auto-accepts anything.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
1440
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill triage-inbox

The instruction itself

13 sections, as written by the author

/triage-inbox — Academic Inbox + Calendar Triage

Turn a noisy academic inbox into a short, decision-ready digest. Fetch recent mail and calendar context through the session's MCP servers (Gmail / Google Calendar), classify each thread into the categories an academic actually acts on, and propose one action per thread — always human-gated. The companion artifact is a running referee-obligations tracker so you never silently overcommit to reviews.

Core principle: this skill *reads, classifies, and proposes*. It drafts; it never sends, accepts, declines, or books anything without you. That boundary is what makes it safe to run unattended as a /schedule routine.

When to use

  • Weekly / daily sweep — "what landed that needs a decision?" without reading every thread yourself.
  • As a scheduled routine — wired to /schedule to run each morning and leave a digest waiting.
  • Referee-load management — keep an honest count of outstanding reviews against a standing cap before you say yes to one more.
  • R&R / editor deadline capture — turn "minor revision due in 6 weeks" buried in an email into a calendar hold proposal.

When NOT to use

  • To actually send a reply, accept an invite, or book an event — this skill stops at *proposals*. You confirm and execute.
  • To handoff a project to a co-author — that's /coauthor-brief.
  • To draft the R&R response document itself — that's /respond-to-referees.

Phases

Phase 0 — Pre-flight (MCP check, window, referee cap)

  • Confirm MCP access. This skill reaches mail/calendar only through the session's MCP tools (Gmail search/read, Google Calendar list/suggest). They are session-scoped — in a headless claude -p or cron run they may be absent. Probe once (e.g. list labels / list calendars). If unavailable, degrade gracefully: emit a tracker-only digest from the on-disk tracker (Phase 3) plus a one-line "MCP servers not reachable in this run — skipped fetch" note, and exit cleanly. Never fail the routine over a missing server.
  • Resolve the lookback window--since (an ISO date or Ndays), else the timestamp of the last digest in quality_reports/inbox/, else default 7 days. Echo it back.
  • Set the referee-load cap--cap if given, else read the standing cap from the tracker header, else default 3 concurrent reviews. This cap gates the recommendation in Phase 2, not your inbox.
  • Echo a one-line pre-flight before fetching: window, cap, calendar on/off (--no-calendar), dry-run on/off.

Phase 1 — Fetch + classify

  • Fetch recent threads via the MCP Gmail search tool over the window; if calendar is on, pull existing events/free-busy for the deadline-conflict check.
  • Classify each thread into exactly one bucket:

| Bucket | Signals |

|---|---|

| Referee request | "invite you to review", journal/editor sender, manuscript ID, "would you be willing" |

| R&R / editor correspondence | "revise and resubmit", "minor/major revision", decision letter, due-date language |

| Co-author thread | known collaborator, shared-paper subject, "can you", "your section", attachment churn |

| Seminar / conference invite | "invited talk", "submit by", CFP, "seminar series", scheduling polls |

| Grant / admin deadline | funder name, "submission deadline", reporting/compliance, IRB/DUA renewals |

| Noise | newsletters, receipts, auto-notifications — counted, not itemized |

  • Capture per thread: sender, subject, a one-line gist, any explicit deadline, and the bucket.

Phase 2 — Propose one action per thread (NEVER auto-send)

For each non-noise thread, propose exactly one of:

  • Draft reply — write a courteous draft *for review*. Do not send. If the Gmail MCP exposes a create-draft tool, you MAY stage a Gmail draft (which still requires the user to hit send) — otherwise inline the text in the digest.
  • Calendar hold — for an R&R / grant / talk deadline, propose a hold (title, date, lead-time reminder). Surface conflicts against existing events. Propose only — booking is the user's click.
  • Scaffold a referee project — for an *accepted* (or leaning-yes) referee request under the cap, offer to run /new-referee-project on the attached manuscript. Over the cap → recommend a polite decline draft instead, and say why ("4 reviews already open vs. cap of 3").
  • Summarize + offer a brief — for a co-author thread, distill the asks and offer to generate a /coauthor-brief.
  • Snooze — defer with a re-surface date; nothing else happens.

Hard gate: every outbound action (send, accept, decline, book, scaffold) waits for explicit user confirmation. Drafts and holds are *proposals*. Honor --dry-run by proposing without staging even drafts.

Phase 3 — Emit digest + update the obligations tracker

  • Digestquality_reports/inbox/YYYY-MM-DD_triage.md (create the dir). Buckets ordered by urgency; each item is a one-liner + its proposed action. Noise is a count, not a list.
  • Referee-obligations trackerquality_reports/inbox/referee-obligations.md (a persistent ledger, not dated). Append/refresh rows for any review accepted, declined, or completed this run; recompute open count vs. cap; flag overdue rows.

Output / report format

# Inbox Triage — YYYY-MM-DD   (window: last N days · referee cap: K)

## Needs a decision (M)
- **[R&R]** *J. of X* — minor revision, **due 2026-07-15**. → Propose calendar hold (−14d reminder); conflicts: none.
- **[Referee]** *Econometrica* — review request, manuscript 12-345. Open reviews 2/3 → under cap. → Offer `/new-referee-project`.
- **[Co-author]** A. Smith — "can you redo Table 3 with not-yet-treated controls?" → Summarized; offer `/coauthor-brief`.

## FYI / snoozed (P)
- **[Seminar]** Dept. brown-bag poll — snoozed to 2026-06-16.

## Noise: 24 threads (newsletters, receipts) — not itemized.

## Referee load: 2 open / cap 3  (see referee-obligations.md)

Plus the one-line chat summary: digest path, counts per bucket, open-reviews-vs-cap, and whether the MCP fetch ran or was skipped.

Exit behavior

  • Normal run: write the digest, refresh the tracker, print the summary line. No mail sent, no event booked, no project scaffolded — those await your confirmation.
  • MCP unavailable (headless/cron): tracker-only digest + "fetch skipped" note; exit 0. The routine must not error just because a session server is absent.
  • Over the referee cap: still surface the request, but the proposed action is a decline draft with the count as rationale — never a silent scaffold.
  • --dry-run: propose everything, stage nothing (not even a draft).

Flags

  • --since <Ndays|date> — Lookback window. Default: the last digest's timestamp, else 7 days.
  • --cap <N> — Standing concurrent-review cap that gates referee scaffolding. Default: the tracker header value, else 3.
  • --no-calendar — Skip the Calendar MCP entirely; classify mail only, no holds proposed.
  • --dry-run — Propose actions without staging anything (no Gmail drafts created).

Cross-references

  • .claude/skills/coauthor-brief/SKILL.md — the handoff brief offered for co-author threads.
  • .claude/skills/respond-to-referees/SKILL.md — drafts the R&R response document once a revision deadline surfaces here.
  • /new-referee-project — scaffolds a review repo from an accepted referee request (the action this skill proposes, never auto-runs).
  • /schedule — wire this skill into a cron routine; the human-gated design is what makes unattended runs safe.
  • .claude/rules/orchestrator-protocol.md — the "no daemon, user/skill-initiated, human-in-the-loop" contract this skill honors for outbound actions.
  • .claude/rules/confidential-data.md — never copy attachment contents, restricted data, or credentials into a digest that may be committed.

What this skill does NOT do

  • Send, reply, accept, decline, or book. It drafts and proposes; you execute. No exceptions, including in scheduled runs.
  • Auto-scaffold a referee project. It *offers* /new-referee-project; scaffolding waits for your yes and respects the cap.
  • Run unattended with side effects. Outbound actions are always human-gated — the only thing a cron run writes is the digest and the tracker.
  • Read or store message bodies wholesale. It extracts gists, deadlines, and senders; it does not archive email contents or attachment data into the repo.
  • Reach mail/calendar without MCP. No direct IMAP/API credentials — everything goes through the session's MCP servers, and their absence degrades gracefully.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take pedrohcgs/triage-inbox from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.