mcpbeat

R Package Check

pedrohcgs/r-package-check

Run the full R package release gate — regenerate docs, run the test suite, run R CMD check --as-cran, and triage every ERROR / WARNING / NOTE against CRAN policy before a release or submission. Use when the user says "check my R package", "R CMD check", "is this package CRAN-ready", "run devtools::check", "prepare for CRAN submission", or points at a directory containing a DESCRIPTION file. Produces a check report + CRAN-submission checklist in `quality_reports/`.

1k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
1440
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill r-package-check

The instruction itself

12 sections, as written by the author

/r-package-check — R Package Release Gate

Run the document → test → check → triage pipeline that decides whether an R package is releasable, then review the source for the issues R CMD check cannot see.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — the package root (a directory containing DESCRIPTION). If blank, autodetect by searching upward/within the working directory for DESCRIPTION.


Constraints

  • Follow .claude/rules/r-package-conventions.md — the CRAN-readiness bar (0 errors, 0 warnings, explained notes) is the gate.
  • Treat man/ and NAMESPACE as generated — regenerate with devtools::document(); never hand-edit them.
  • Run the r-package-reviewer agent on the source before declaring the package releasable.
  • Do not bump the version or write to CRAN. This skill *checks*; the human decides when to submit.

Workflow Phases

Phase 0: Pre-Flight Report

## Pre-Flight Report — R Package Check

**Package:** [name + version from DESCRIPTION]
**Root:** [path]
**Exported functions:** [from NAMESPACE / `@export` count]
**Dependencies:** Imports [list] · Suggests [list] · Depends [list]
**Toolchain available:** devtools [✓/✗], roxygen2 [✓/✗], testthat [✓/✗], R CMD [✓/✗], covr [✓/✗]
**Plan:** document → test → check --as-cran → triage → review

Detect the toolchain with a quick probe; if devtools/R CMD is missing, stop and tell the user what to install.

Rscript -e 'cat("devtools:", requireNamespace("devtools", quietly=TRUE),
               "roxygen2:", requireNamespace("roxygen2", quietly=TRUE),
               "testthat:", requireNamespace("testthat", quietly=TRUE),
               "covr:", requireNamespace("covr", quietly=TRUE), "\n")'

Phase 1: Document

Regenerate man/ + NAMESPACE and detect drift (generated docs that were not committed):

Rscript -e 'devtools::document("[pkg]")'
git -C "[pkg]" status --short man/ NAMESPACE   # any diff = generated docs were stale

If git status shows changes, flag: the committed man//NAMESPACE were out of sync with the roxygen blocks.

Phase 2: Test

Rscript -e 'devtools::test("[pkg]")'

Report failures and (if covr is available, Phase 4) coverage of exported functions.

Phase 3: Check (--as-cran)

Run the full check. This is slow (minutes) — background-launch and stream with the Monitor tool rather than blocking:

Rscript -e 'devtools::check("[pkg]", args = "--as-cran")'
# or: R CMD build [pkg] && R CMD check --as-cran [pkg]_*.tar.gz

Then triage every result into a table:

| Result | Tier | CRAN-policy meaning | Action |

|---|---|---|---|

| … | ERROR / WARNING / NOTE | … | fix / justify |

  • ERROR / WARNING → must fix before submission.
  • NOTE → fix if cheap; otherwise write the justification you'd put in cran-comments.md (e.g., "New submission", "Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs … the URL is correct and reachable").

Phase 4: Coverage (optional)

Rscript -e 'covr::package_coverage("[pkg]")'

Report per-function coverage; flag exported functions with 0% coverage.

Phase 5: Source Review

Delegate to the r-package-reviewer agent:
"Review the package source at [pkg]"

Address Critical (CRAN-policy violations) and High (check WARNINGs) findings.

Phase 6: Release Gate + Report

Save a report to quality_reports/[package]_package_check.md and present a verdict:

## Release Gate — [package] [version]
- R CMD check --as-cran: E errors, W warnings, N notes
- Tests: P passed, F failed
- Coverage: X% of exported functions
- r-package-reviewer: C critical, H high
- **Verdict:** RELEASABLE / FIX-FIRST / POLICY-VIOLATION

### CRAN-submission checklist
[ ] 0 errors, 0 warnings; each note justified in cran-comments.md
[ ] Version bumped + NEWS.md updated
[ ] devtools::check_win_devel() / R-hub on other platforms (note: run separately)
[ ] Reverse-dependency check if this is an update (revdepcheck)

Important

  • --as-cran or it doesn't count. A plain R CMD check misses the policy checks that actually gate submission.
  • Generated files are generated. If docs drift, the fix is devtools::document(), not editing .Rd.
  • The gate is 0/0/explained. 0 errors, 0 warnings, every remaining note justified — nothing less is "CRAN-ready."
  • This skill does not submit. Cross-platform checks (win-devel, R-hub) and the actual devtools::release() are the maintainer's call.

Long-running checks: use the Monitor tool

R CMD check --as-cran and covr can run for several minutes. Background-launch via Bash with run_in_background: true, capture the bash_id, and use the Monitor tool to stream progress (e.g. the checking … lines or process exit) instead of polling. See data-analysis/SKILL.md for the pattern.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take pedrohcgs/r-package-check from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.