Use when creating or updating a Makefile for a project, especially when standard targets (build, test, lint, format, etc.) are missing or when modifying targets that may already be wired into other tooling. Not for debugging why a build fails.
npx skills add https://github.com/Ovid/paad --skill makefile
On invocation: announce "Running paad:makefile v1.31.0-preview", then immediately proceed with the steps below — do not stop after announcing.
Process:
digraph makefile_flow {
"Makefile exists?" [shape=diamond];
"Existing target needs change?" [shape=diamond];
"Approved?" [shape=diamond];
"Coverage tool defaults to watch mode?" [shape=diamond];
"Test tool supports balanced output?" [shape=diamond];
"Detect stack" [shape=box];
"Create from scratch" [shape=box];
"Include all required targets" [shape=box];
"Identify missing targets" [shape=box];
"Add new targets" [shape=box];
"STOP: ask user for approval" [shape=box, style=bold];
"Apply change" [shape=box];
"Skip change" [shape=box];
"Force the one-shot flag for the detected stack" [shape=box];
"Verify the tool exits on its own before adding flags" [shape=box];
"ASK the user how to handle test output" [shape=box];
"Announce the file written or updated" [shape=box];
"Done" [shape=box];
"Detect stack" -> "Makefile exists?";
"Makefile exists?" -> "Create from scratch" [label="no"];
"Makefile exists?" -> "Identify missing targets" [label="yes"];
"Create from scratch" -> "Include all required targets";
"Include all required targets" -> "Coverage tool defaults to watch mode?";
"Identify missing targets" -> "Add new targets";
"Add new targets" -> "Existing target needs change?";
"Existing target needs change?" -> "Coverage tool defaults to watch mode?" [label="no"];
"Coverage tool defaults to watch mode?" -> "Force the one-shot flag for the detected stack" [label="yes — vitest, jest"];
"Coverage tool defaults to watch mode?" -> "Verify the tool exits on its own before adding flags" [label="unclear — pytest-cov, cargo, go test"];
"Force the one-shot flag for the detected stack" -> "Test tool supports balanced output?";
"Verify the tool exits on its own before adding flags" -> "Test tool supports balanced output?";
"Existing target needs change?" -> "STOP: ask user for approval" [label="yes"];
"STOP: ask user for approval" -> "Approved?";
"Approved?" -> "Apply change" [label="yes"];
"Approved?" -> "Skip change" [label="no"];
"Apply change" -> "Existing target needs change?" [label="next target"];
"Skip change" -> "Existing target needs change?" [label="next target"];
"Test tool supports balanced output?" -> "Announce the file written or updated" [label="yes"];
"Test tool supports balanced output?" -> "ASK the user how to handle test output" [label="no — only silent or firehose"];
"ASK the user how to handle test output" -> "Announce the file written or updated";
"Announce the file written or updated" -> "Done";
}
npm run, just, task, nox, or cargo xtask doesn't need a Makefile shimming over it. Ask before introducing a second entry point.Creates or updates a project Makefile with standard targets. Never modifies an existing target without explicit user approval.
Read project files in this order to understand the technology and available commands:
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md — often lists exact commands for test, lint, format, buildREADME.md — frequently documents dev workflowpackage.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, Gemfile, etc.) — reveals available scripts/tasksUse the commands the project already documents. Do not invent commands that aren't confirmed to exist.
Every Makefile must include at minimum:
| Target | Purpose |
|----------|------------------------------------|
| help | List all targets with descriptions |
| all | Full CI pass (lint + format + test at minimum) |
| test | Run test suite |
| cover | One-shot coverage report |
| lint | Lint (with autofix if available) |
| format | Format code |
Add extra targets (e.g. build, dev, preview) only if the project supports them.
Every target gets a ## description. help extracts them with grep + awk:
.PHONY: all test cover lint format help
all: lint format test ## Lint, format, and test
test: ## Run full test suite
<stack-specific command>
cover: ## Generate code coverage report (one-shot)
<stack-specific command, forced one-shot — see below>
lint: ## Lint with autofix
<stack-specific command>
format: ## Format code
<stack-specific command>
help: ## Show this help
@grep -E '^[a-zA-Z_-]+:.*?## .*$$' $(MAKEFILE_LIST) | awk 'BEGIN {FS = ":.*?## "}; {printf " %-10s %s\n", $$1, $$2}'
All targets must appear in .PHONY.
If an existing target's implementation would change, stop and tell the user:
> "The existing cover target runs X. I'd change it to Y because [reason]. Should I make this change?"
Wait for explicit approval. Adding a brand-new target never requires approval.
Coverage tools often default to watch mode. Force one-shot execution:
-- --run-- --watchAll=falsemake test output should be actionable, not overwhelming. Avoid both extremes:
Goal: On success, show a concise summary (total passed/failed/skipped). On failure, show the failing test name, assertion, and enough context to act on it.
Common approaches by stack:
| Stack | Flag / Approach |
|-------|-----------------|
| vitest | --reporter=default is usually fine; avoid --reporter=verbose |
| jest | Default is good; avoid --verbose |
| pytest | -q or --tb=short — default is often too verbose |
| cargo test | Default is fine; --quiet if too noisy |
| go test | Default is fine; avoid -v unless debugging |
| prove (Perl) | Default is fine; avoid --verbose |
If the testing tool doesn't support balanced output (e.g., only offers silent vs. firehose), inform the user and ask how they'd like to handle it rather than guessing.
End the run with the file list, always. One line per path, marked new or updated:
Files written or updated:
updated Makefile
Say it even though only one file changed, and even when the user watched you change it. If you were asked to change an existing target and stopped for approval instead, say that too — an unapproved target is not a written one.
| Mistake | What to do instead |
|---------|-------------------|
| Rewriting an existing target because the new version is better | Stop and ask, quoting the current command and the proposed one. Other tooling (CI, hooks, docs, muscle memory) may depend on the current behaviour. |
| Treating "add a flag to an existing target" as additive | Changing a target's implementation is a change, flag or not. It needs approval. |
| Inventing commands the stack doesn't have | Detect first — read CLAUDE.md, README, and the language manifest. A lint target running a linter that isn't installed is worse than no target. |
| Writing a help target that lists targets by hand | Use the self-documenting ## pattern, so help can't drift from reality. |
| Leaving cover in watch mode | It hangs the agent and CI. Force one-shot explicitly, per the stack. |
| Omitting targets from .PHONY | A file named test in the repo root silently breaks make test. |
| Adding every optional target for completeness | Extra targets (build, dev, preview) go in only when the project actually supports them. |
Take ovid/paad-makefile from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.