Review And Plan Skill for Codex

Review And Plan

Discover opportunities first; implementation still goes through ../optim-plans/SKILL.md.

Required Flow

• Inspect the target Git repo before asking product questions. Read the app shape, docs, tests, dependency files, entry points, recent change notes, and any obvious UX or safety-critical paths.
• Search GitHub open-source projects for feature inspiration before ranking opportunities. Use gh search repos / gh search code when available; if gh is unavailable or unauthenticated, use the GitHub REST/search API or web search constrained to GitHub repository pages. Record sources either way.
• Produce a ranked opportunity list grouped exactly by:
• Documentation
• Efficiency/cost
• Feature completeness
• UX
• Safety/recoverability
• For each opportunity, include stable fields:
• id: stable ID such as OPP-001
• category: one group above
• rank: rank within category or overall list
• title
• repo_evidence: local file/behavior evidence
• repository_url: GitHub source repository URL
• supported_claim: concise claim supported by that source
• source_tool: gh, github-api, or web
• Ask one case-by-case opportunity question at a time before any accepted opportunity enters implementation scope. Use only planning-stage generic controller-backed choice questions.
• Each opportunity question must recommend one disposition first: accept, defer, or reject, with evidence. Offer the other dispositions as alternatives, then Other second-last, then Auto-complete last.
• Treat Auto-complete as acceptance of the recommended planning disposition only. It never approves execution.
• Route accepted opportunity IDs into the normal optim-plans flow: PLAN_v1.md, refinement, immutable execution manifest approval, execution, validation, controller verification, and integration gates.

Hard Boundaries

• Do not ask about preferences the repo or cited sources can answer.
• Do not implement from the opportunity list directly.
• Do not bypass execution approval, manifest binding, validator review, controller verification, path audits, or final integration checks.
• If a GitHub source only loosely inspires an idea, say that in supported_claim; do not overstate the source.