Execute Elixir/Phoenix plan tasks with progress tracking. Use after /phx:plan to implement features with mix compile and mix test verification after each step, or --continue to resume interrupted work.
npx skills add https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill work
Execute tasks from a plan file with checkpoint tracking and verification.
/phx:work .claude/plans/user-auth/plan.md
/phx:work .claude/plans/user-auth/plan.md --from P2-T3
/phx:work --skip-blockers
/phx:work # Resumes most recent plan
<plan-file> -- Path to plan file (optional, auto-detects recent)--from <task-id> -- Resume from specific task (e.g., P2-T3)--skip-blockers -- Continue past blocked tasks--continue -- Resume IN_PROGRESS plan from checkboxesphase -- always ask the user what to do next
immediately start Phase N+1. Do NOT stop or ask for permission
between phases. Only stop at BLOCKERS or when ALL phases are done.
[x] = done, [ ] = pending.No separate JSON state files. Resume by reading the plan.
git add -A or git add .and decisions that prevent rework. Step 2 is not optional.
when a plan task's intent is unclear
Ask the user for plans with >3 tasks:
> This plan has {count} remaining tasks across {count} phases.
>
> 1. Start working -- Begin immediately (familiar patterns)
> 2. Quick research -- Read source files first (~10 min)
> 3. Extensive research -- Web search + docs (~30 min)
Skip for plans with 3 or fewer simple tasks -- just start.
> Split warning: Plans with >10 tasks risk 2-3 context
> compactions. Suggest splitting via /phx:plan if not already.
Read scratchpad and compound docs before writing any code — skipping
this causes rework. Read .claude/plans/{slug}/scratchpad.md (short,
critical context) for dead-ends and decisions, then Grep .claude/solutions/
for solved patterns. Apply findings: skip dead-ends, follow decisions,
reuse patterns. Ask the user when a task's intent is ambiguous — never
guess, corrections are expensive.
Read plan file, count [x] (completed) vs [ ] (remaining).
Find first unchecked task by [Pn-Tm] ID.
Create Claude Code tasks from ALL unchecked plan items using
TaskCreate. This gives real-time progress visibility in the UI:
For each unchecked `- [ ] [Pn-Tm] Description`:
TaskCreate({
subject: "[Pn-Tm] Description",
description: "Full task details from plan",
activeForm: "Implementing: Description"
})
Skip already-checked items ([x]) — don't create tasks for them.
Set up blockedBy dependencies between phases (Phase 2 tasks
blocked by Phase 1 tasks).
With --from P2-T3: Skip to that specific task.
Stale-plan check: if the plan predates this session (file mtime), spot-check
2-3 files it references before executing — assumptions may have drifted.
See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/resume-strategies.md for all resume modes.
Execute each unchecked task (- [ ] [Pn-Tm][agent] Description):
TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "in_progress"})[agent] annotation (see ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/execution-guide.md)mix format + mix compile --warnings-as-errors(at phase end, also run mix test <affected> — see tiers below)
[x] on pass, **appendimplementation note** inline, AND
TaskUpdate({taskId, status: "completed"}). Example:
- [x] [P1-T3] Add user schema — citext for email, composite index on [user_id, status]
This survives context compaction; the plan is re-read on resume.
and write DEAD-END to scratchpad (see error-recovery.md)
Parallel groups: Tasks under ### Parallel: header spawn
as background subagents. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/execution-guide.md
for spawning pattern, prompt template, and checkpoint flow.
Verification tiers (scoped to minimize redundant runs):
mix compile --warnings-as-errors only(format is checked by PostToolUse hook automatically)
mix compile --warnings-as-errors + mix test <affected_files> + mix credo --strict(scope tests: mix test test/path/to_affected_test.exs — NOT full suite)
project_eval(create record, fetch, verify -- see execution-guide.md)
mix test (full suite — run ONCE at the end, not per-phase)Token efficiency: Do NOT narrate each verification step. Execute
tool calls directly without "Let me now run..." preamble. Only narrate
when explaining a non-obvious decision or reporting a failure. When
several checkboxes complete together (parallel groups, resume catch-up),
batch them into ONE edit pass — never one Edit call per checkbox.
The PostToolUse hook checks formatting but does NOT modify files —
run mix format explicitly during verification or before committing.
Summarize results with AskUserQuestion:
> Implementation complete! {done}/{total} tasks finished.
> {count} files modified across {count} phases.
Options: 1. Run review (/phx:review) (Recommended),
/phx:brief — understand what was built),/commit), 4. Continue manually.If any task fixed a non-obvious bug, also mention /phx:compound
to capture the solution.
With blockers: list them, offer Replan (/phx:plan),
Review first (/phx:review), or Handle myself.
If blockers remain, auto-write HANDOFF to scratchpad:
### [HH:MM] HANDOFF: {plan name}
Status: {done}/{total} tasks. Blockers: {list}.
Next: {first unchecked task ID and description}.
Key decisions: {brief list from this session}.
Include context beyond checkboxes for fresh session resume.
NEVER auto-start /phx:review or any other phase.
After completion, use Glob to find other plan files matching
.claude/plans/*/plan.md. If pending plans exist, inform the
user. Do NOT auto-start.
/phx:plan → /phx:work (YOU ARE HERE) → /phx:review → /phx:compound
↑ ASK USER before each transition
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/execution-guide.md -- Task routing, parallel execution, verification${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/resume-strategies.md -- Resume modes and state persistence${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/file-formats.md -- Plan and progress file formats${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/error-recovery.md -- Error handling and blockers${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/harness-patterns.md -- Critic-refiner pattern for debugging loopsIntegration with protocols.io API for managing scientific protocols. This skill should be used when working with protocols.io to search, create, update, or publish protocols; manage protocol steps and materials; handle discussions and comments; organize workspaces; upload and manage files; or integrate protocols.io functionality into workflows. Applicable for protocol discovery, collaborative protocol development, experiment tracking, lab protocol management, and scientific documentation.
Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.
Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.
Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.
Take oliver-kriska/work from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.