mcpbeat Sign in

Codex Ab Agent Skill

Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
3
files
ships runnable scripts
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
514
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix --skill codex-ab

What comes with it

4 049 bytes besides the instruction
scripts/codex-panel-ab.sh
triggers.json

The instruction itself

10 sections, as written by the author

Codex Panel A/B (contributor instrument — verdict decided)

Answer one question with evidence: **do dimension-focused codex passes find

real issues that one holistic codex exec review misses?** Runs both on the

same diff, then classifies every focused finding against the holistic pass.

> DECIDED 2026-07-10 after 4 runs (2 fresh): panel KILLED. Fresh-only

> 1 real miss / 1 false positive plus one zero-value run at 4× cost —

> real misses did not outnumber FPs. Kept as contributor tooling (NOT

> distributed) for one possible retest: a UI-heavy diff with a single

> extra liveview-focused pass (2× cost). Scoreboard:

> .claude/research/2026-07-03-codex-review-integration.md §7.

Usage

/codex-ab            # A/B against main (~5 min, 4 codex runs)
/codex-ab develop    # explicit base branch

Iron Laws

  • FRESH DIFF ONLY — ask the user to confirm this branch has NOT been

codex-reviewed yet (cloud or /phx:codex-loop). A drained diff returns

NO FINDINGS everywhere and proves nothing — wasted quota

  • Verify every REAL MISS in the code before counting it — a focused

finding only scores if the issue actually exists at that file:line

  • Read ONLY the findings .md files — streams are diverted to .log

files; never cat a log into context (10k+ lines each)

  • Exactly 4 codex runs, never re-run dimensions — bounded quota
  • Persist the verdict — an unrecorded experiment is wasted quota

Workflow

Step 1: Preflight

Run command -v codex — missing → STOP with install hint. Then:

  • git status --short dirty → warn (codex flags local dirt as findings)
  • Ask: "Has codex already reviewed this branch (PR review or codex-loop)?"

If yes → STOP, explain the fresh-diff requirement (Iron Law 1)

Step 2: Run the A/B (background, ~5 min)

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/codex-panel-ab.sh {base} \
  .claude/reviews/codex-ab-$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M)

Use run_in_background — it runs 1 holistic codex exec review + 3

focused codex exec workers (security / ecto / liveview) in parallel,

all streams redirected. Do other work or wait; never poll.

Step 3: Classify

Read the 4 findings files (holistic.md, security.md, ecto.md,

liveview.md — small). For EACH focused finding:

| Class | Meaning | Test |

|-------|---------|------|

| DUPLICATE | Holistic already found it | Same file + same defect |

| REAL MISS | Genuine issue holistic missed | Read the code at file:line — defect confirmed (Iron Law 2) |

| FALSE POSITIVE | Manufactured, pre-existing, or wrong | Code check fails, or issue exists on base branch too |

Step 4: Verdict

Present:

## Codex Panel A/B — {branch} vs {base}
| dimension | findings | duplicate | real miss | false positive |
Holistic-only findings: {n}
Verdict this run: {REAL MISS count} real miss vs {FP count} false positive
Decision rule: build --codex-panel only if real misses outnumber false
positives across 2-3 fresh branches.

Write the verdict table to .claude/reviews/codex-ab-{date}/VERDICT.md.

Suggest repeating on the next 1–2 fresh branches before deciding.

Integration

fresh branch → /codex-ab (YOU ARE HERE) → verdict logged
   ├─ real misses win across runs → build /phx:review --codex-panel
   └─ duplicates/FPs win → keep holistic /phx:codex-loop, drop panel idea
       └─ OUTCOME 2026-07-10: this branch won — panel dropped

References

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/codex-panel-ab.sh — the 4-run harness
  • Related: /phx:codex-loop (holistic fix loop), /phx:review --codex

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Receiving Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

2k tokens
Requesting Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

2k tokens
Git Commit
by github
vendor ×3

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

799 tokens
Github Code Review
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

13k tokens
Karpathy Guidelines
by hyyhf
×3

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

629 tokens
Code Reviewer
by google-gemini
vendor ×2

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

795 tokens
Agent MD Refactor
by softaworks
×2

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

4k tokens
Commit Work
by softaworks
×2

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take oliver-kriska/codex-ab from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.