mcpbeat Sign in

Nw Review Agent Skill

Dispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Use when a roadmap, implementation, or step needs quality review before proceeding.

2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
588
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-review

What it tells the agent to use

found in the instruction text
Task spawns other agents

The instruction itself

19 sections, as written by the author

NW-REVIEW: Expert Critique and Quality Assurance

Wave: CROSS_WAVE

Agent: Dynamic (nw-*-reviewer)

Overview

Dispatches expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Takes base agent name, appends -reviewer, invokes with artifact. Reviewer agent owns all review methodology|criteria|output format.

Review Philosophy: Radical Candor

Every review MUST embody Radical Candor — kind AND clear, specific AND sincere:

  • Care personally: Acknowledge what works. Understand author's intent before critiquing. Include at least one genuine praise: per review.
  • Challenge directly: Be specific about what is wrong and WHY. Ground feedback in evidence|consequences, not preference. Never soften security/data-loss issues.
  • Avoid ruinous empathy: Never "LGTM" when real issues exist. Hedging ("maybe consider possibly...") on blocking concerns is a review failure.
  • Avoid obnoxious aggression: Never "this is terrible" without constructive alternative. Focus on work, not author. Explain "why" behind every critique.

Feedback Format: Conventional Comments

All findings MUST use Conventional Comments labels:

| Label | Purpose | Blocking? |

|---|---|---|

| praise: | Highlight something done well (genuine, not filler) | No |

| issue (blocking): | Must be resolved before proceeding | Yes |

| issue (blocking, security): | Security vulnerability — maximum directness | Yes |

| suggestion: | Propose improvement with reasoning | Mark (blocking) or (non-blocking) |

| nitpick (non-blocking): | Trivial, preference-based | No |

| question (non-blocking): | Seek clarification before assuming | No |

| thought (non-blocking): | Idea sparked by the review | No |

Findings MUST be priority-ordered: blocking issues first, then suggestions, then nitpicks/praise.

Approval Criteria

| Verdict | Criteria |

|---|---|

| APPROVED | No blocking issues. Non-blocking feedback is advisory. |

| NEEDS_REVISION | Blocking issues exist. Author must address. Each blocking issue enumerated. |

| REJECTED | Fundamental design problems requiring significant rework. Rare — explain thoroughly, offer alternatives. |

Syntax

/nw-review @{agent-name} {artifact-type} "{artifact-path}" [step_id={id}] [--dimensions=rpp] [--from=1] [--to=3]

Parameters:

  • @{agent-name} - Base agent (e.g., @nw-software-crafter). -reviewer suffix appended automatically.
  • {artifact-type} - One of: baseline, roadmap, step, task, implementation
  • {artifact-path} - Path to artifact file (resolved to absolute)
  • step_id={id} - Required for step and implementation reviews
  • --dimensions=rpp - Triggers RPP code smell scan alongside standard review (Dimension 4)
  • --from=N / --to=N - RPP level range (default: 1-6). Requires --dimensions=rpp

Rigor Profile Integration

Before dispatching the reviewer agent, read rigor config from .nwave/des-config.json (key: rigor). If absent, use standard defaults.

  • review_enabled: If false, skip the review entirely. Output: "Review skipped per rigor profile (review_enabled=false)."
  • reviewer_model: Pass as model parameter to Task tool. If "skip", skip the review. Overrides the default Haiku model.
  • double_review: If true and called from deliver Phase 4, the caller is responsible for invoking review twice.

Agent Derivation

| User provides | Reviewer invoked |

|---|---|

| @nw-software-crafter | nw-software-crafter-reviewer |

| @nw-solution-architect | nw-solution-architect-reviewer |

| @nw-platform-architect | nw-platform-architect-reviewer |

Default model: Haiku (overridden by rigor.reviewer_model when set).

Agent Invocation

  • Parse parameters — Strip @ from agent name, resolve artifact path to absolute, extract optional step_id, dimensions, from/to range. Gate: all parameters parsed.
  • Read rigor config — Read .nwave/des-config.json key rigor. If absent, use standard defaults. Gate: rigor profile loaded or defaults applied.
  • Validate inputs — Run all four validation checks below. Gate: zero validation failures.
  • Apply rigor overrides — Check review_enabled (skip if false), determine model from reviewer_model (default: haiku, skip if "skip"). Gate: execution decision made.
  • Invoke reviewer — Call Task tool with subagent_type="{agent-name}-reviewer", resolved model, and prompt "Review {artifact-type}: {absolute-artifact-path} [step_id={id}]". Reviewer handles reading artifact, applying domain expertise, generating structured critique, updating original artifact with review metadata. Gate: Task tool invoked.

Validation (before invoking)

  • Agent exists — Strip @, check agent name against agent registry. Gate: agent found or return "Unknown agent: {name}. Check available agents with /nw-agents."
  • Artifact type valid — Confirm type is one of: baseline, roadmap, step, task, implementation. Gate: type valid or return "Invalid artifact type: {type}. Use: baseline, roadmap, step, task, implementation."
  • Artifact file exists — Resolve to absolute path and confirm file exists. Gate: file found or return "Artifact not found: {path}."
  • step_id present when required — Require step_id when artifact type is step or implementation. Gate: step_id provided or return "step_id required for {type} reviews."

Success Criteria

  • [ ] Reviewer agent invoked (not self-performed)
  • [ ] Original artifact file updated with review metadata
  • [ ] Review includes severity levels and approval status (APPROVED, NEEDS_REVISION, REJECTED)

Examples

Example 1: Step review

/nw-review @nw-software-crafter step "docs/feature/auth-upgrade/execution-log.json" step_id=02-01

Invokes nw-software-crafter-reviewer with step review of execution log, step 02-01.

Example 2: Roadmap review

/nw-review @nw-solution-architect roadmap "docs/feature/auth-upgrade/roadmap.json"

Invokes nw-solution-architect-reviewer with roadmap review.

Example 3: Implementation review

/nw-review @nw-platform-architect implementation "docs/feature/auth-upgrade/execution-log.json" step_id=01-01

Invokes nw-platform-architect-reviewer with implementation review of step 01-01.

Example 4: RPP code quality review

/nw-review @nw-software-crafter implementation "src/des/" --dimensions=rpp --from=1 --to=3

Invokes nw-software-crafter-reviewer with implementation review + RPP L1-L3 code smell detection using cascade rule.

Error Messages

  • Invalid agent: "Unknown agent: {name}. Check available agents with /nw-agents."
  • Invalid type: "Invalid artifact type: {type}. Use: baseline, roadmap, step, task, implementation."
  • Missing file: "Artifact not found: {path}."
  • Missing step_id: "step_id required for {type} reviews."

Next Wave

Handoff To: Depends on review outcome (rework or proceed)

Deliverables: Updated artifact file with embedded review metadata

Expected Outputs

Updated artifact file (roadmap.json, execution-log.json, etc.) with reviews section

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Protocolsio Integration
by christophacham
×4

Integration with protocols.io API for managing scientific protocols. This skill should be used when working with protocols.io to search, create, update, or publish protocols; manage protocol steps and materials; handle discussions and comments; organize workspaces; upload and manage files; or integrate protocols.io functionality into workflows. Applicable for protocol discovery, collaborative protocol development, experiment tracking, lab protocol management, and scientific documentation.

16k tokens
Tailored Resume Generator
by frostant
×4

Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances

3k tokens
Excalidraw Diagram Generator
by github
vendor ×3

Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.

36k tokens scripts
Expo Dev Client
by openai
vendor ×3

Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight

961 tokens
Executing Plans
by ZhanlinCui
×3

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

542 tokens
Anndata
by christophacham
×3

Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.

16k tokens
Benchling Integration
by christophacham
×3

Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.

14k tokens
Biopython
by christophacham
×3

Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.

24k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take nwave-ai/nw-review from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.