Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation
npx skills add https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-persona-jtbd-analysis
Use during Phase 1 (GATHER) when the user lacks clear personas or the "Who" section needs rigorous definition. Provides structured alternative to ad-hoc persona descriptions.
For each user type, build a complete persona:
## Persona: {Name}
**Who**: {Role description -- one sentence capturing relationship to product}
**Demographics**:
- {Characteristic 1: e.g., technical proficiency level}
- {Characteristic 2: e.g., frequency of interaction}
- {Characteristic 3: e.g., environment/context of use}
- {Characteristic 4: e.g., primary motivation}
**Jobs-to-be-Done**: (see Job Step Table below)
**Pain Points**:
- {Pain 1} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
- {Pain 2} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
**Success Metrics**:
- {Quantified outcome 1: e.g., "Task completed in < 2 minutes"}
- {Quantified outcome 2: e.g., "Zero manual configuration steps"}
Each persona has job steps describing what they accomplish. Steps follow ODI format.
| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome |
|----------|------|-----------------|
| {Verb} | {What the user wants to achieve} | Minimize {metric} of {undesirable state} |
| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome |
|----------|------|-----------------|
| Discover | Find the right tool for the task | Minimize time to evaluate fit |
| Install | Get the tool running locally | Minimize steps to working state |
| Configure | Adapt to local environment | Minimize likelihood of misconfiguration |
| Verify | Confirm correct installation | Minimize uncertainty about readiness |
| Start | Begin productive work | Minimize time from install to first output |
Every pain point maps to a specific job step. Pain points without a corresponding step indicate either a missing step or irrelevant pain point.
Pain Point: "I don't know if the tool supports my OS"
-> Job Step: Discover
-> Desired Outcome: Minimize uncertainty about compatibility
Pain Point: "Installation fails silently with no error message"
-> Job Step: Install
-> Desired Outcome: Minimize time to diagnose installation failures
Prioritize: pain points on high-frequency job steps deserve attention first.
Every success metric needs a number or threshold. Qualitative metrics ("easy to use") are not actionable.
| Qualitative | Quantified |
|-------------|-----------|
| "Easy to install" | "Install completed in < 2 minutes with zero manual steps" |
| "Fast startup" | "First productive output within 30 seconds of launch" |
| "Reliable" | "Zero silent failures; all errors produce actionable messages" |
| "Intuitive" | "New user completes core task without reading documentation" |
Different users have fundamentally different jobs even when using the same product. Segment by relationship to the product.
Common axes: Frequency (first-time vs returning vs power user) | Role (end user vs admin vs developer) | Context (individual vs team vs CI/CD) | Motivation (exploration vs production vs evaluation)
| Persona | Primary Job | Key Difference |
|---------|-------------|----------------|
| Explorer | Evaluate the tool quickly | Needs fast time-to-value, minimal commitment |
| Returner | Resume work after absence | Needs state preservation, quick re-orientation |
| Deployer | Install for a team | Needs configuration management, multi-user setup |
| Automator | Integrate into CI/CD pipeline | Needs scriptability, headless operation, exit codes |
Each persona gets their own Job Step table because workflows differ. Do not merge personas -- JTBD analysis value comes from surfacing differences.
After completing persona analysis, feed results into LeanUX user story template:
Cross-reference: use bdd-requirements skill for Example Mapping once personas established. Use jtbd-workflow-selection skill to determine workflow for resulting stories.
Integration with protocols.io API for managing scientific protocols. This skill should be used when working with protocols.io to search, create, update, or publish protocols; manage protocol steps and materials; handle discussions and comments; organize workspaces; upload and manage files; or integrate protocols.io functionality into workflows. Applicable for protocol discovery, collaborative protocol development, experiment tracking, lab protocol management, and scientific documentation.
Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.
Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.
Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.
Take nwave-ai/nw-persona-jtbd-analysis from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.