Transform brain dumps into polished blog posts in Nick Nisi's voice. Use when the user wants to write a blog post with scattered ideas, talking points, and conclusions that need organization into a cohesive narrative with Nick's conversational, authentic, and thoughtful tone.
npx skills add https://github.com/nicepkg/ai-workflow --skill blog-post-writer
Transform unstructured brain dumps into polished blog posts that sound like Nick Nisi.
Accept whatever the user provides:
Don't require organization. The mess is the input.
Load references/voice-tone.md to understand Nick's writing style.
Key characteristics:
Read references/story-circle.md to understand the narrative framework.
Determine if the content fits a story structure:
Not every post needs the full Story Circle, but look for narrative opportunities.
Structure the material into sections:
Common structures:
Choose the structure that fits the content.
Apply voice characteristics:
Opening:
Body:
Technical content:
Tone modulation:
Ending:
Check the post:
Show the post to the user for feedback and iterate.
"AI is going to replace developers."
I must have heard that phrase a hundred times in the last year.
I've been thinking a lot about how we use AI in our daily work.
Then something clicked.
I watched it use rg to search through codebases, just like I would.
I won't lie – joining Meta was intimidating.
I watched it use `rg` to search through codebases, just like I would.
It ran `npm test` to verify its changes weren't breaking anything.
You're not being replaced; you're being amplified.
references/voice-tone.md - Complete voice and tone guide. Read this first to capture Nick's style.references/story-circle.md - Story Circle narrative framework. Check if content fits a story structure.User provides brain dump:
thoughts on using cursor vs claude code
- cursor is in IDE, feels familiar
- but claude code is in terminal, my natural environment
- tried cursor first, felt weird leaving vim
- claude code met me where I was
- not about which is better, about workflow fit
- some devs love IDE integration
- I need terminal access
- conclusion: use what fits YOUR workflow
Process:
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
| Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Official Opentrons Protocol API for OT-2 and Flex robots. Use when writing protocols specifically for Opentrons hardware with full access to Protocol API v2 features. Best for production Opentrons protocols, official API compatibility. For multi-vendor automation or broader equipment control use pylabrobot.
Take nicepkg/blog-post-writer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.