After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event.
npx skills add https://github.com/neurofoo/agent-skills --skill aar
Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.
Work through the four core questions honestly and specifically. Focus on events and systems, not blaming individuals.
Event: What are we reviewing?
Date: When did it happen?
Participants: Who was involved?
*Before the event, what did we think would happen?*
Goals/Objectives
Plan
Success Criteria
Assumptions
*Facts only—what occurred, not why*
Timeline
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [When] | [What happened] |
Outcomes
Compared to Expected
| Expected | Actual | Gap |
|----------|--------|-----|
| [expectation] | [reality] | [+/-] |
*Analysis of the gap between expected and actual*
What Went Well (sustain these)
| Success | Contributing Factors |
|---------|---------------------|
| [what worked] | [why it worked] |
What Didn't Go Well (improve these)
| Problem | Root Cause |
|---------|-----------|
| [what failed] | [why it failed] |
Surprises
*Specific actions to sustain or improve*
Sustain (keep doing these)
| Action | Owner | How to Protect It |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| [what to continue] | [who] | [mechanism] |
Improve (change these)
| Action | Owner | By When |
|--------|-------|---------|
| [what to change] | [who] | [deadline] |
Key Takeaways
Top 3 lessons from this review:
Follow-up
When will we check if improvements are working?
$ARGUMENTS
Integration with protocols.io API for managing scientific protocols. This skill should be used when working with protocols.io to search, create, update, or publish protocols; manage protocol steps and materials; handle discussions and comments; organize workspaces; upload and manage files; or integrate protocols.io functionality into workflows. Applicable for protocol discovery, collaborative protocol development, experiment tracking, lab protocol management, and scientific documentation.
Analyzes job descriptions and generates tailored resumes that highlight relevant experience, skills, and achievements to maximize interview chances
Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", or "generate an Excalidraw file". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, and system architecture diagrams. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files that can be opened directly in Excalidraw.
Build and distribute Expo development clients locally or via TestFlight
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Data structure for annotated matrices in single-cell analysis. Use when working with .h5ad files or integrating with the scverse ecosystem. This is the data format skill—for analysis workflows use scanpy; for probabilistic models use scvi-tools; for population-scale queries use cellxgene-census.
Benchling R&D platform integration. Access registry (DNA, proteins), inventory, ELN entries, workflows via API, build Benchling Apps, query Data Warehouse, for lab data management automation.
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.
Take neurofoo/aar from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.