mcpbeat Sign in

Review Vcpkg Prs Today Agent Skill

Review open non-draft microsoft/vcpkg pull requests updated in the last 30 days. Use when asked for batch triage, per-PR review reports, an index grouped by verdict, or grouping competing PRs that modify the same port.

897 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
27327
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg --skill review-vcpkg-prs-today

The instruction itself

6 sections, as written by the author

Inputs

| Input | Required | Meaning |

|---|---|---|

| investigation-root | No | Directory for large temporary artifacts such as worktrees, sources, builds, examples, and installs. Final deliverables still go under reviews/ in the caller's current directory. If omitted, infer a short same-drive path when clear; otherwise ask. Never use the Copilot session directory or an arbitrary long temp path. |

| review-depth | No | One of no-examples, examples, or examples-and-patches. Default to no-examples. |

Example invocations

  • /review-vcpkg-prs-today investigation-root D:/vcpkg-prs
  • /review-vcpkg-prs-today review-depth examples
  • /review-vcpkg-prs-today investigation-root D:/vcpkg-prs and review-depth examples

Procedure

  • Discover candidate PRs with the GitHub Search API or gh api, not by paging the generic pulls list. Filter to:
  • repo:microsoft/vcpkg
  • is:pr
  • is:open
  • draft:false
  • updated:>=<today minus 30 days>
  • Prefer authenticated requests via gh or GITHUB_TOKEN; unauthenticated limits are usually too low for a full batch.
  • For each candidate PR, fetch the changed file list and identify touched ports from paths matching ports/<portname>/.
  • Group competing PRs only by the specific port or ports they share. Put PRs that touch no port in a separate index section.
  • Review every candidate independently with a general-purpose worker using its default high-capability model; do not override it with a fast or lightweight model. Every worker must read all of .github/skills/shared/review-vcpkg-pr-guide.md and treat every instruction as mandatory. Group competing PRs only in the final index.md.
  • Write each report when completed. Write index.md last from the final per-PR results and port-specific competition groups.

Parallel execution safety

  • Give each concurrent worker its own writable detached worktree or equivalent detached-HEAD workspace. Never share a writable repository path between workers.
  • Create all isolated workspaces before launching workers. Copy vcpkg.exe (Windows) or vcpkg (non-Windows) into each one; for example, after git worktree add D:\vcpkg2 origin/master, copy .\vcpkg.exe to D:\vcpkg2.
  • Use the caller's working tree only when exactly one worker is active and the user explicitly allows it.

index.md content

index.md must include:

  • Coverage summary, including how many PRs were reviewed, skipped, or failed.
  • PRs grouped by the shared guide's verdicts: approve, approve-with-notes, request-changes, and unknown.
  • Competing PRs grouped by shared modified port.
  • PRs with no touched ports/<portname>/ entries.
  • PRs that failed to review, with a short reason instead of silently omitting them.

Required output layout

Write all deliverables under reviews/ in the caller's current directory, not under investigation-root. Each worker substitutes its PR number for {{PR_NUMBER}}; the shared guide defines report.md.

reviews/
├── index.md
├── pr-12345/
│   ├── report.md
│   └── patches/
│       └── *.patch
└── pr-12346/
    ├── report.md

Do not stop until reviews/index.md and reviews/pr-{{PR_NUMBER}}/report.md for each reviewed PR number exist and are complete.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Receiving Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

2k tokens
Requesting Code Review
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

2k tokens
Git Commit
by github
vendor ×3

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

799 tokens
Github Code Review
by ComeOnOliver
×3

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

13k tokens
Karpathy Guidelines
by hyyhf
×3

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

629 tokens
Code Reviewer
by google-gemini
vendor ×2

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

795 tokens
Agent MD Refactor
by softaworks
×2

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

4k tokens
Commit Work
by softaworks
×2

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take microsoft/review-vcpkg-prs-today from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.