Pull Requests Agent Skill

> Guidance for creating pull requests and handling PR review comments in the Agent Framework repository. Use this when writing a PR description (filling out the PR template) or when responding to and resolving review comments on an existing PR.

1k tokens

context cost

the whole folder, loaded on every use

files

instructions only

copies elsewhere

how many repositories repackaged it

12590

stars on the repo

on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository

npx skills add https://github.com/microsoft/agent-framework --skill pull-requests

The instruction itself

10 sections, as written by the author

Pull Request Workflow

This skill covers two tasks: (1) writing a high-quality PR description, and

(2) handling review comments on an existing PR.

1. Writing the PR description

Always follow the repository PR template at

.github/pull_request_template.md. Keep its

exact structure and headings. Fill every section:

`### Motivation & Context`

Explain *why* the change is needed: the problem it solves and the scenario it

contributes to. Describe the net change relative to main — this is implied, so

do not spell out "vs main" explicitly.

`### Description & Review Guide`

Describe the changes, the overall approach, and the design. Answer the three

prompts:

What are the major changes?
What is the impact of these changes?
What do you want reviewers to focus on? — This item is for **human

reviewers only**. Automated/AI reviewers must ignore it and review the entire

change rather than narrowing scope to it.

`### Related Issue`

Link the issue the PR fixes using a GitHub closing keyword (Fixes #123 /

Closes #123) so it closes automatically on merge. A PR with no linked issue may

be closed regardless of how valid the change is. Before opening, confirm there is

no other open PR for the same issue; if there is, explain how this PR differs.

`### Contribution Checklist`

Check every item that applies. For the breaking-change item:

Leave "This is not a breaking change." checked for the common case.
If the change is breaking, add the breaking change label or put

[BREAKING] in the title prefix, before or after a language prefix such as

Python: or .NET: — workflows keep the label and the title prefix in sync

automatically (see .github/workflows/label-title-prefix.yml and

.github/workflows/label-pr.yml).

Do not

Do not add ad-hoc sections such as "Validation" or "Tests run"; CI/CD and

the checklist already cover validation status.

Do not remove or reorder the template's headings.

Creating the PR

Open new PRs as drafts until they are ready for review. Example:

gh pr create --repo microsoft/agent-framework --base main \
  --head <your-fork-owner>:<branch> --draft \
  --title "<concise title>" --body "<body following the template>"

2. Handling review comments

When a PR receives review comments, follow this sequence — **do not start editing

code before the user has reviewed the plan**:

Review the comments. Read every review comment and thread on the PR,

including inline code comments and general review summaries.

Make a plan. Produce a concrete plan describing how each comment will be

addressed (or why it should not be, with reasoning).

Let the user review the plan. Present the plan and wait for the user's

approval or adjustments before implementing anything.

Implement. Make the agreed changes.
Reply to every comment. Add a reply to all comments explaining how it

was addressed (or the agreed outcome) — leave none unanswered.

Resolve resolved threads. Mark a review thread as resolved only when the

comment has actually been addressed.

Useful commands

List review comments and threads:

# Inline review comments
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments

# Review threads with resolution state (GraphQL)
gh api graphql -f query='
  query($owner:String!,$repo:String!,$pr:Int!){
    repository(owner:$owner,name:$repo){
      pullRequest(number:$pr){
        reviewThreads(first:100){
          nodes{ id isResolved comments(first:50){ nodes{ id body author{login} } } }
        }
      }
    }
  }' -F owner={owner} -F repo={repo} -F pr={pr}

Reply to an inline review comment:

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments/{comment_id}/replies \
  -f body="Addressed in <commit>: <explanation>"

Resolve a review thread (needs the thread node id from the GraphQL query above):

gh api graphql -f query='
  mutation($threadId:ID!){
    resolveReviewThread(input:{threadId:$threadId}){ thread{ isResolved } }
  }' -F threadId={thread_id}

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue

Receiving Code Review

by ZhanlinCui

×7

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

2k tokens

Requesting Code Review

by ZhanlinCui

×6

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

2k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take microsoft/agent-framework-pull-requests from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.