mcpbeat

Writing Releases

medusajs/writing-releases

Writes GitHub release notes for Medusa releases in the established style. Use when generating a draft release description from a list of commits and PR metadata. Covers minimal patch releases, single-highlight releases, multi-feature releases, and releases with breaking changes.

3k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
4
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
35569
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/medusajs/medusa --skill writing-releases

What comes with it

9 171 bytes besides the instruction
reference/format.md
reference/highlights.md
reference/release-types.md

The instruction itself

8 sections, as written by the author

Writing Medusa Release Notes

Generates GitHub release notes from commit/PR data in the established Medusa style.

Constraints

  • Full Changelog link is mandatory — always the last line: Full Changelog: vPREV...vNEW
  • No top-level Breaking Changes section — breaking changes are embedded inside their Highlight subsection with 🚧 Breaking change, never in a separate ## Breaking Changes heading
  • Bullet format is strict — every entry in Features/Bugs/Chores/etc. must include author link and PR link (see reference/format.md)
  • Highlights are not a summary of all PRs — only significant changes qualify; routine additions go in Features/Bugs bullets only (see reference/release-types.md)
  • No emojis — the only permitted emoji is 🚧 on breaking change highlights; use none anywhere else
  • Code block required for actionable steps — if a highlight requires the developer to install a package, run a command, or update config, include a fenced code block with the exact command(s)

Load Reference Files When Needed

> Load at least one reference file before writing.

| Task | Load |

|------|------|

| Formatting sections and bullets | reference/format.md |

| Deciding whether to write Highlights, and identifying breaking changes | reference/release-types.md |

| Writing the Highlights section | reference/highlights.md |

Quick Reference

Release type decision

| Commit set | Release type |

|-----------|-------------|

| Only routine fixes/chores, no user-facing impact | Minimal — no Highlights section |

| One important change is the main reason for the release | Single Highlight |

| Multiple significant features or fixes | Multi-Highlight |

| Any PR with a minor changeset in .changeset/ | Add 🚧 to that Highlight |

Section order (include only sections with entries)

## Highlights
## Features
## Bugs
## Documentation
## Chores
## Other Changes
## New Contributors
**Full Changelog**: [vPREV...vNEW](url)

Common Mistakes

  • [ ] Adding a title or # Heading at the top — release notes have no title, start directly with the first section
  • [ ] Adding a ## Breaking Changes top-level section — embed inside the Highlight instead
  • [ ] Putting a routine bug fix or small feature addition in Highlights
  • [ ] Missing the Full Changelog link at the end
  • [ ] Bullet missing author link or PR link
  • [ ] Using PR title verbatim as a Highlight heading — write a descriptive outcome-focused title
  • [ ] Treating every feat: commit as a Highlight candidate
  • [ ] Using emojis anywhere except 🚧 on breaking change highlights
  • [ ] Writing a Highlight that requires a developer action (install, run, config change) without a fenced code block

Reference Files

reference/format.md          — section order, bullet format, commit prefix → section mapping
reference/release-types.md   — when to add Highlights, breaking change detection, highlight criteria
reference/highlights.md      — how to write Highlight subsections

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take medusajs/writing-releases from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.