mcpbeat Sign in

Playground Msw Tests Agent Skill

> REQUIRED and PRIMARY testing approach for packages/playground and packages/playground-ui. React Query interactions, or any test work in these packages. Generates Vitest tests that drive the real @mastra/client-js + React Query stack through MSW handlers and typed fixtures derived from @mastra/client-js response types. This is the #1 way to test the playground packages — ABOVE Playwright E2E. Use Playwright only for cross-page user journeys that MSW cannot model.

3k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
26898
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/mastra-ai/mastra --skill playground-msw-tests

The instruction itself

16 sections, as written by the author

MSW + client-js Fixtures: Primary Testing Strategy

Core Principle

Drive the real transport, mock the network.

Tests in packages/playground and packages/playground-ui MUST be written as

Vitest tests that exercise the real @mastra/client-js SDK, the real React Query

cache, and the real component/hook code paths. The only seam we mock is the

network boundary, via MSW.

This catches contract drift between the playground and @mastra/client-js at

typecheck time and at test time — something vi.mock('@/hooks/...') style tests

cannot do.

Priority Order

When you write or refactor a test for these packages, choose in this order:

  • MSW + typed client-js fixtures (THIS SKILL) — for hooks, pages, routes,

data-fetching, gating, redirect logic, query/mutation flows, error paths.

  • Playwright E2E (e2e-tests-studio skill) — only for genuine cross-page

user journeys, real browser concerns (focus/keyboard/viewport), or anything

that requires a real running Mastra server.

  • Pure unit tests — only for self-contained utilities/services with no

network, no React Query, no router involvement.

If the same behavior can be covered by both #1 and #2, prefer #1. MSW tests

are faster, deterministic, run in CI without browsers, and assert the real wire

contract.

What NOT to do

  • vi.mock('@/domains/.../hooks/use-agents') — mocking our own hooks hides

cache, gating and transport bugs.

  • ❌ Implementation-mirror tests — do not duplicate source class strings,

branch logic, generated shapes, or calculations without asserting a real

behavior or regression.

  • ❌ Class-name-only visual tests — expect(node.className).toContain(...)

usually just tests that the implementation string exists. Prefer no test over

a className duplication test; use computed style, user-visible behavior, or a

browser/Storybook check unless the class string itself is the public API.

  • ❌ Inline TypeScript types in tests (type AgentLite = { id: string }) —

these drift silently from the real SDK.

  • as any / as unknown as ListAgentsResponse on fixture data, MSW

responses, request payloads, hook inputs, or component event inputs.

  • ❌ Returning bespoke shapes from MSW handlers that don't match the real

@mastra/client-js response. If a field is optional, include it as optional

in the fixture, don't omit the type.

What TO do

  • ✅ Put fixtures in a __tests__/fixtures/ folder next to the test file.
  • ✅ Type every fixture with a response type re-exported from @mastra/client-js

(e.g. ListStoredAgentsResponse, GetAgentResponse, BuilderSettingsResponse,

GetToolResponse, GetWorkflowResponse, ListStoredSkillsResponse).

  • ✅ Use direct imports and inferred types from real SDK, hook, component, DOM,

or Testing Library APIs for MSW payloads, request payloads, hook inputs, and

component events.

  • ✅ Register MSW handlers per test with server.use(...) so handlers reset

between tests via the global afterEach.

  • ✅ Render through MastraReactProvider + QueryClientProvider + MemoryRouter

so the real client SDK is the transport.

  • ✅ Use vi.fn() wrappers inside MSW handlers to assert which endpoints were

hit (great for testing enabled: ... gating without mocking hooks).

Standard Test Skeleton

// @vitest-environment jsdom
import { MastraReactProvider } from '@mastra/react';
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from '@tanstack/react-query';
import { cleanup, render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';
import { MemoryRouter } from 'react-router';
import { afterEach, describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';

import { server } from '@/test/msw-server';
import { Subject } from '../subject';
import { happyPathResponse } from './fixtures/subject';

const BASE_URL = 'http://localhost:4111';

const renderSubject = () => {
  const queryClient = new QueryClient({ defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } } });
  return render(
    <MastraReactProvider baseUrl={BASE_URL}>
      <QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
        <MemoryRouter>
          <Subject />
        </MemoryRouter>
      </QueryClientProvider>
    </MastraReactProvider>,
  );
};

afterEach(() => cleanup());

describe('Subject', () => {
  it('renders the happy path', async () => {
    server.use(http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/agents`, () => HttpResponse.json(happyPathResponse)));

    renderSubject();

    expect(await screen.findByText('Expected behavior')).not.toBeNull();
  });
});

Standard Fixture File

// packages/playground/src/.../__tests__/fixtures/subject.ts
import type { ListStoredAgentsResponse } from '@mastra/client-js';

export const emptyStoredAgents: ListStoredAgentsResponse = {
  agents: [],
  total: 0,
  page: 1,
  perPage: 50,
  hasMore: false,
};

export const oneDraftAgent: ListStoredAgentsResponse = {
  ...emptyStoredAgents,
  agents: [
    {
      id: 'agent-1',
      name: 'Draft Agent',
      instructions: '',
      model: { provider: 'openai', name: 'gpt-4o-mini' },
      status: 'draft',
      // ...other required fields from StoredAgentResponse
    },
  ],
  total: 1,
};

**If a required field on the SDK response type is missing from your fixture,

that's a real test failure — fix the fixture, never as any it.** The same

applies to hook inputs, component events, and request payloads: type the helper

at the real boundary instead of casting the test into compiling.

Existing Infrastructure to Reuse

  • packages/playground/src/test/msw-server.ts — exports server. The global

vitest.setup.ts calls server.listen({ onUnhandledRequest: 'error' }),

server.resetHandlers() after each test, and server.close() at the end.

This means unhandled requests fail tests loudly — that's the contract.

  • packages/playground/vitest.setup.ts — already wires MSW lifecycle, jsdom

polyfills (matchMedia, Element.prototype.scrollTo), so test files just

add their own server.use(...) per case.

Recipes

Test loading state without mocking hooks

Defer the MSW handler's resolution with a promise gate:

const gate = (() => {
  let resolve: () => void = () => {};
  const promise = new Promise<void>(r => {
    resolve = r;
  });
  return { promise, resolve };
})();

server.use(
  http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/stored/agents`, async () => {
    await gate.promise;
    return HttpResponse.json(emptyStoredAgents);
  }),
);

renderSubject();
expect(screen.getByTestId('spinner')).not.toBeNull();

gate.resolve();
await waitFor(() => expect(screen.queryByTestId('spinner')).toBeNull());

Assert that a query is gated (enabled: false)

Wrap the handler in a vi.fn and assert it was never called:

const onAgents = vi.fn<() => void>();
server.use(
  http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/agents`, () => {
    onAgents();
    return HttpResponse.json(emptyAgents);
  }),
);

renderSubject(); // user has no write access → hook should not fire

await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 50));
expect(onAgents).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

Assert per-feature-flag gating

Use a single MSW handler per endpoint and one vi.fn per endpoint, then

toggle the builder-settings response to flip features on/off and assert which

handlers were hit.

Vary response by query string

Read request.url inside the handler:

server.use(
  http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/stored/agents`, ({ request }) => {
    const status = new URL(request.url).searchParams.get('status');
    return HttpResponse.json(status === 'draft' ? oneDraftAgent : emptyStoredAgents);
  }),
);

Thin component seams that ARE acceptable to mock

You may replace these with very thin stubs:

  • A heavy child component that has its OWN dedicated test (e.g. mock

AgentBuilderStarter to <div data-testid="agent-builder-starter" />).

  • react-router's Navigate so you can assert the redirect target instead

of letting it actually navigate.

  • Button / Spinner style atoms from @mastra/playground-ui only when the

real component requires more global context than the test needs.

Never mock our own data hooks, services, or auth gating logic — drive those

through their real implementations against MSW.

Verification Checklist

Before considering a test done:

  • [ ] All fixtures import a response type from @mastra/client-js; MSW payloads,

request payloads, hook inputs, and component events use direct imports or

inferred production boundary types; no bespoke test-only shapes and no

as any / as unknown as casts.

  • [ ] No vi.mock of @/domains/.../hooks/*, @/domains/.../services/*,

@mastra/client-js, or @mastra/react.

  • [ ] pnpm --filter ./packages/playground typecheck passes — proves fixtures

conform to the live SDK shape.

  • [ ] The new test runs in isolation AND as part of the package suite without

onUnhandledRequest: 'error' failures.

  • [ ] Coverage for the file under test is at the target level (usually 100%

for hooks/pages, since MSW makes every branch reachable).

When to Reach for Playwright Instead

Reach for e2e-tests-studio only when at least one is true:

  • The behavior spans multiple pages with real navigation/history.
  • The behavior requires a real Mastra server (streaming, workflow execution,

real model providers).

  • The behavior is fundamentally a browser concern (drag-drop, focus traps,

viewport, file uploads).

Everything else — fetching, caching, redirects, gating, optimistic updates,

error states, empty states, pagination, search params — belongs in this skill.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Webapp Testing
by anthropics
vendor ×12

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

6k tokens scripts
Finishing A Development Branch
by ZhanlinCui
×7

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

1k tokens
Test Driven Development
by w95
×7

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

2k tokens
Systematic Debugging
by ratacat
×7

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

10k tokens scripts
Verification Before Completion
by ZhanlinCui
×6

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

1k tokens
Backtest Expert
by BaggaT236
×3

Expert guidance for systematic backtesting of trading strategies. Use when developing, testing, stress-testing, or validating quantitative trading strategies. Covers "beating ideas to death" methodology, parameter robustness testing, slippage modeling, bias prevention, and interpreting backtest results. Applicable when user asks about backtesting, strategy validation, robustness testing, avoiding overfitting, or systematic trading development.

15k tokens scripts
Adaptyv
by christophacham
×3

Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.

16k tokens
Aeon
by christophacham
×3

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

19k tokens

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take mastra-ai/playground-msw-tests from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.