当用户要做/研究一个东西、想提升某个技能、或觉得某个产出不够好想改进时使用。用「改良主义」先逼出一个最垃圾但能跑的原型,再引导他自己洞察缺陷、提出问题,提改良假说→实践检验→迭代,信奉「洞察缺陷 > 如何优化 > 最终答案」,并把每次改进的方法本身沉淀成方法论。触发场景:要做 X、研究 X、提升 X、X 做得不好想改进、怎么优化 X、不知从哪下手做。
npx skills add https://github.com/Li-Evan/Bloom --skill learn-prototype
> 核心信条:洞察缺陷 > 如何优化 > 最终答案。 试图洞察缺陷、自己提出问题,永远不要害怕问题多简单。学习要努力,但要做有效的努力。
用户要动手做 / 研究一个东西,或想把某个已有产出改得更好。这是"重输入、轻输出"短板的解药——逼用户从输入切到输出。
别追求完美,先有一个能跑 / 能看的最小版本。卡在"还没准备好"就是没进改良主义。
关键且不能代劳:问他"这哪里不好?为什么不好?"哪怕问题很简单。把"自己提问"的动作交给用户——这是能力泛化的来源。你可以追问、补他没看到的角度,但先让他提。
针对缺陷提一个改良策略(视为假说,可对可错),动手改,看效果。错了也有用——错误暴露后,下次自动规避这个方向。
循环②③,直到无法再优化 → 推翻重做。允许"不正确但有用的版本"——能解决当前问题就够了,不必一开始追求完美架构。
把"这次怎么从 A 改到 B"的方法本身记一笔(每个解决的问题都成为后续的法则)。改得越多,方法越泛化,提问越准。
> ⚠️ 铁律·只用确证的已会知识:判断用户「已经会什么」只能用他确证学过的知识(亲口确认或可靠背景);严禁把「正在讲的材料 / 文章作者背景 / 对话里别人的知识」当成用户会的。拿不准 → 直接问「⚠️ 你学过 ___ 吗?」,绝不替他假设。
learn-graph;想确认是否真懂 → 转 learn-feynman。learn-occam learn-crossover learn-graph learn-feynman。Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
Use this skill to query your Google NotebookLM notebooks directly from Claude Code for source-grounded, citation-backed answers from Gemini. Browser automation, library management, persistent auth. Drastically reduced hallucinations through document-only responses.
Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.
Access USPTO APIs for patent/trademark searches, examination history (PEDS), assignments, citations, office actions, TSDR, for IP analysis and prior art searches.
Multiagent AI system for scientific research assistance that automates research workflows from data analysis to publication. This skill should be used when generating research ideas from datasets, developing research methodologies, executing computational experiments, performing literature searches, or generating publication-ready papers in LaTeX format. Supports end-to-end research pipelines with customizable agent orchestration.
Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.
Take li-evan/learn-prototype from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.