mcpbeat Sign in

Lawve Agentic Delegation Audit Ignacio Adrian Lerer Agent Skill

Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.

1k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
2
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
616
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer

What comes with it

307 bytes besides the instruction
README.md

The instruction itself

7 sections, as written by the author

Lawve Agentic Delegation Audit

Use this skill to help lawyers evaluate whether an AI agent workflow is safe enough to use in legal or business operations.

Core idea:

When AI only answers, the user evaluates an output.
When AI acts, the user delegates authority.
Delegated authority needs controls, logs, revocation, and accountability.

Use When

  • A client wants to use an AI agent for legal, compliance, business, or administrative work.
  • A product, law firm, or legal ops team is connecting an agent to email, files, CRM, court portals, payments, messaging, calendars, databases, browser tools, or code execution.
  • A lawyer needs to explain the risks of agentic AI in practical governance terms.
  • A workflow may send, file, delete, approve, purchase, publish, sign, deploy, or change access.
  • A system claims to be "autonomous", "agentic", "assistant with tools", "AI employee", "legal copilot", or "workflow agent".

Do Not Use For

  • Pure doctrinal legal research with no agentic action.
  • Final legal opinions without jurisdiction-specific legal review.
  • Technical implementation of an agent runtime.
  • Approving production use of an agent without evidence, logs, and controls.

Intake

Collect only what is necessary:

  • What task does the agent perform?
  • Who is the human principal?
  • Who deploys or operates the agent?
  • What systems, accounts, files, channels, or tools can it access?
  • What actions can it take without step-by-step approval?
  • Which actions are irreversible, external, financial, legal, confidential, or reputation-sensitive?
  • What logs exist and who can read them?
  • How can the user pause, revoke, appeal, or correct the agent?
  • What data can influence the agent, including emails, webpages, chats, files, tickets, and prompts?

Audit Steps

  • Classify the autonomy level
  • answer_only: produces information only.
  • draft_only: drafts but does not send or change records.
  • approval_gated_actor: acts only after explicit approval.
  • policy_bounded_actor: acts within predefined limits.
  • long_running_actor: continues across time, sessions, or triggers.
  • Map delegated authority
  • Name the principal.
  • Name the deployer/operator.
  • List what authority the agent has.
  • Separate read, draft, internal write, external write, financial, legal-sensitive, and privileged actions.
  • Check observability
  • Can the user see what the agent did?
  • Are tool calls and external actions logged?
  • Are logs understandable by a non-developer?
  • Are source data and model inference separated?
  • Check control and revocation
  • Can the user pause the agent?
  • Can permissions be narrowed?
  • Can access be revoked quickly?
  • Are irreversible actions previewed before execution?
  • Check accountability
  • Who is responsible if harm occurs?
  • Is responsibility split across vendor, deployer, user, professional, and client?
  • Is there a human review point before legal reliance or external action?
  • Check attack surface
  • Can untrusted content influence the agent?
  • Does the agent process emails, webpages, chats, documents, tickets, or social posts as instructions?
  • Are external content and system instructions separated?
  • Are prompt injection, data exfiltration, and tool misuse considered?
  • Apply legal uncertainty gate
  • Use PASS, ESCALATE, or BLOCK for downstream legal/business reliance.
  • Do not hide material uncertainty in disclaimer text.

Output

Use this compact format:

## Agentic Delegation Audit

### Verdict
PASS | NEEDS CONTROLS | BLOCK

### Why
[2-5 sentences]

### Delegated Authority
- Principal:
- Deployer/operator:
- Autonomy level:
- Systems/tools:
- Highest-risk action:

### Control Checklist
- Permission scope: adequate | weak | missing
- Human approval before external/legal/financial action: yes | partial | no
- User-readable logs: yes | partial | no
- Revocation/pause: yes | partial | no
- Prompt-injection/data-boundary controls: yes | partial | no
- Accountability owner: clear | partial | unclear

### Required Controls
- [control 1]
- [control 2]
- [control 3]

### Legal Reliance Gate
PASS | ESCALATE | BLOCK

### Next Step
[smallest practical next step]

Decision Rules

  • PASS: agent is draft-only or tightly approval-gated, logs are clear, permissions are scoped, and no material legal/client risk remains unmanaged.
  • NEEDS CONTROLS: agent may be useful, but missing controls prevent safe operational reliance.
  • BLOCK: agent can perform external, legal, financial, confidential, destructive, or privileged actions without adequate approval, logging, revocation, or accountability.

Other skills for the same job

different authors, same section of the catalogue
Skill Creator
by anthropics
vendor ×10

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

56k tokens scripts
Skill Creator
by vercel-labs
vendor ×10

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

12k tokens scripts
Skill Creator
by JayZeeDesign
×9

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

10k tokens scripts
Template Skill
by JayZeeDesign
×7

Replace with description of the skill and when Claude should use it.

35 tokens
Dispatching Parallel Agents
by ZhanlinCui
×5

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

2k tokens
Skill Development
by anthropics
vendor ×4

This skill should be used when the user wants to "create a skill", "add a skill to plugin", "write a new skill", "improve skill description", "organize skill content", or needs guidance on skill structure, progressive disclosure, or skill development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

9k tokens
Find Skills
by sanity-io
vendor ×4

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

1k tokens
Writing Skills
by ZhanlinCui
×4

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

26k tokens scripts

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take lawve-ai/lawve-agentic-delegation-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.