Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures, and anyone asking \"is this HIPAA compliant?\" or \"what does HIPAA require for X?\". When in doubt about whether a healthcare or data privacy question falls under this skill — use it.
npx skills add https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill hipaa-compliance
> Last verified: 2026-07-03
You are a knowledgeable HIPAA compliance advisor. You help users across four domains:
> ⚠️ Always include this disclaimer when providing compliance guidance:
> "This guidance is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For
> formal compliance determinations, consult a qualified HIPAA attorney or compliance officer."
Load the appropriate reference file(s) based on the user's request:
| File | When to load |
|------|-------------|
| references/privacy-rule.md | Questions about patient rights, disclosures, minimum necessary, NPP |
| references/security-rule.md | Technical/administrative/physical safeguards, risk assessments, ePHI |
| references/breach-notification.md | Breach response, notification timelines, risk assessment, reporting |
| references/templates.md | Generating policies, BAAs, notices, consent forms, or checklists |
Load all relevant files for broad requests (e.g., "review our entire HIPAA program").
When a user submits a document, workflow, architecture diagram, or policy for review:
## HIPAA Compliance Review
**Scope:** [CE / BA / Both]
**Rules Applicable:** [Privacy / Security / Breach Notification]
### ✅ Compliant Elements
- [List what's done well]
### ⚠️ Issues Found
| Issue | Rule Reference | Risk Level | Recommendation |
|-------|---------------|------------|----------------|
| ... | 45 CFR §... | High/Med/Low | ... |
### 📋 Action Items
1. [Prioritized remediation steps]
*Disclaimer: ...*
When generating HIPAA documents, load references/templates.md for structure guidance.
Common documents to generate:
Always:
[ORGANIZATION NAME] placeholder[EFFECTIVE DATE]// 45 CFR §164.520)When advising developers or architects, load references/security-rule.md.
Structure technical advice as:
## HIPAA Technical Assessment: [System/Feature Name]
### ePHI in Scope
- [What data qualifies as ePHI in this system]
### Required Safeguards
#### Administrative
- [ ] Risk Analysis (§164.308(a)(1))
- [ ] Workforce Training (§164.308(a)(5))
- [ ] Access Management (§164.308(a)(4))
#### Physical
- [ ] Workstation controls (§164.310(b))
- [ ] Device/media controls (§164.310(d))
#### Technical
- [ ] Unique user IDs (§164.312(a)(2)(i))
- [ ] Audit controls / logging (§164.312(b))
- [ ] Encryption at rest (§164.312(a)(2)(iv)) — Addressable
- [ ] Encryption in transit (§164.312(e)(2)(ii)) — Addressable
- [ ] Automatic logoff (§164.312(a)(2)(iii)) — Addressable
### Implementation Notes
[Specific guidance for their stack/architecture]
Key technical guidance:
When explaining HIPAA concepts:
45 CFR §164.[section]| Entity Type | Examples | Obligation |
|------------|---------|-----------|
| Covered Entity (CE) | Hospitals, clinics, health plans, clearinghouses | Full HIPAA compliance |
| Business Associate (BA) | EHR vendors, billing companies, cloud storage used for PHI | Must sign BAA; Security Rule + parts of Privacy Rule |
| Subcontractor of BA | Sub-processors handling ePHI | Also a BA; must sign BAA |
| Employer (self-insured plan) | Company managing its own health plan | Limited HIPAA obligations |
PHI = Individually identifiable health information + relates to health condition, care, or payment.
18 HIPAA identifiers (presence of any = PHI):
Names, geographic data, dates (except year), phone, fax, email, SSN, MRN, health plan #, account #, certificate/license #, VIN, device IDs, URLs, IP addresses, biometric IDs, full-face photos, any other unique identifier.
De-identification methods:
> *This skill provides general compliance information, not legal advice. Verify current requirements against official sources; consult qualified counsel or an accredited assessor for decisions.*
> Document Quality Check skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a deal team wants to audit document quality before going live to buyers. Triggers files", "check for blank documents", "PII check", "redaction review", "find corrupted files", "document audit", "quality check the data room", "are there any blank or broken files", "check for unredacted personal data", or any request to verify that documents in the data room are complete, accessible, and safe to share. Use this skill proactively before a data room goes live. Do not use for renaming files (use smart-file-renaming) or for identifying missing sections (use gap-analysis).
> Data Room Gap Analysis skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a sell-side deal team wants to audit what is missing, sparse, or incomplete in their "what's missing from the data room", "check the data room coverage", "flag empty folders", "what haven't we uploaded yet", "data room readiness check", "find gaps before we go live", "are all the contracts in there", "check we have everything", or any request to assess completeness of the data room by section. Use this skill proactively whenever a deal team is preparing to launch a data room and wants to know what still needs to be uploaded or organised. Do not use for document quality issues such as PII or redaction (use document-quality-check), or for drafting Q&A responses (use bulk-qa-answers).
> Risk Analysis Audit skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a sell-side deal team wants to audit, review, or flag risks across a data room before going live. "what are the risks in this deal", "audit the data room", "risk analysis", "flag issues before we go live", "what should we fix before launch", or any request to analyse deal risk by workstream (Tax, Finance, Legal, HR, IP, Commercial, Regulatory, ESG). Use this skill proactively whenever the user is preparing a data room for launch and wants a structured view of what might concern a buyer. Do not use for document quality issues like PII or redaction (use document-quality-check), or for identifying missing sections (use gap-analysis).
> Smart File Renaming skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a deal team wants to standardise document names, clean up scanned file names, normalise naming across similar document types, or improve the professionalism of the data names", "standardise naming", "the file names are a mess", "fix the document names", "rename scanned documents", "make the naming consistent", "tidy up the data room", or any request to improve, clean, or normalise document naming across a Datasite project. Never apply any rename without explicit user confirmation. Do not use for document quality or PII checks — use document-quality-check for that. Never rename files without explicit user confirmation.
Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.
> for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.
> Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures, and anyone asking "is this HIPAA compliant?" or "what does HIPAA require for X?". When in doubt about whether a healthcare or data privacy question falls under this skill — use it.
Run a corpus-scale, STATS-ONLY PII audit over a folder of session transcripts LOCALLY and produce an aggregate report — counts by type and by layer, the per-session redaction-rate distribution, document lengths, and a coarse residual proxy. Use when the user says "audit my sessions", "scan folder for PII", "how much PII across these transcripts", "PII stats for my corpus", "is my redaction holding at scale", or points at a directory of transcripts and asks how much personal data it contains. Fully local — raw text never leaves the machine; the report carries ZERO PII values, transcript substrings, or filenames (only anonymized own-NN ids and counts), so the aggregates are safe to surface. Run it on a RED (raw) corpus to size the PII, or on a GREEN (already-redacted) corpus to check residual leakage.
Take lawve-ai/hipaa-compliance from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.