Conducts structured requirements workshops to produce feature specifications, user stories, EARS-format functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and implementation checklists. Use when defining new features, gathering requirements, or writing specifications. Invoke for feature definition, requirements gathering, user stories, EARS format specs, PRDs, acceptance criteria, or requirement matrices.
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill feature-forge
Requirements specialist conducting structured workshops to define comprehensive feature specifications.
Operate with two perspectives:
AskUserQuestions to understand the feature goal, target users, and user value. Present structured choices where possible (e.g., user types, priority level).AskUserQuestions for structured choices and open-ended follow-ups. Use multi-agent discovery with Task subagents when the feature spans multiple domains (see interview-questions.md for guidance).AskUserQuestions to review acceptance criteria with stakeholder, presenting key trade-offs as structured choicesLoad detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| EARS Syntax | references/ears-syntax.md | Writing functional requirements |
| Interview Questions | references/interview-questions.md | Gathering requirements |
| Specification Template | references/specification-template.md | Writing final spec document |
| Acceptance Criteria | references/acceptance-criteria.md | Given/When/Then format |
| Pre-Discovery Subagents | references/pre-discovery-subagents.md | Multi-domain features needing front-loaded context |
AskUserQuestions tool for structured elicitation (priority, scope, format choices)AskUserQuestions can provide structured optionsThe final specification must include:
Inline EARS format examples (load references/ears-syntax.md for full syntax):
When <trigger>, the <system> shall <response>.
Where <feature> is active, the <system> shall <behaviour>.
The <system> shall <action> within <measure>.
Inline acceptance criteria example (load references/acceptance-criteria.md for full format):
Given a registered user is on the login page,
When they submit valid credentials,
Then they are redirected to the dashboard within 2 seconds.
Save as: specs/{feature_name}.spec.md
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Agile product ownership toolkit for Senior Product Owner including INVEST-compliant user story generation, sprint planning, backlog management, and velocity tracking. Use for story writing, sprint planning, stakeholder communication, and agile ceremonies.
Expert guidance for writing secure, reliable, and performant Claude Code hooks - validates design decisions, enforces best practices, and prevents common pitfalls. Use when creating, reviewing, or debugging Claude Code hooks.
Use when creating or developing anything, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured Socratic questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Use markdown formatting when drafting content intended for external systems (GitHub issues/PRs, Jira tickets, wiki pages, design docs, etc.) so formatting is preserved when the user copies it. Load this skill before producing any draft the user will paste elsewhere.
IMMEDIATELY USE THIS SKILL when creating or develop anything and before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through structured Socratic questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation
Take jeffallan/feature-forge from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.