mcpbeat Sign in

Li Inbox Agent Skill

>- Triage the LinkedIn inbox - sort connection requests and DMs into leads, recruiters, peers and spam, and draft the replies worth sending. Use when the user says "my inbox is a mess", "triage my DMs", "should I reply to this", pastes a batch of LinkedIn messages, or is drowning in connection requests.

723 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
112
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself

Install

one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill --skill li-inbox

The instruction itself

6 sections, as written by the author

li-inbox

Most LinkedIn inboxes are 80% noise, and the cost of that noise is that the

20% goes unanswered for a week. This skill separates them, then writes only

what is worth writing.

Input

The user pastes the messages. Screenshots are fine. Do not log into their

account or read their inbox with a browser tool.

Sort into five

| bucket | signal | action |

| --- | --- | --- |

| LEAD | describes a problem the user solves, or asks about working together | reply today, full answer |

| RECRUITER | a role, a company, a salary band | reply if the role is real, one line if not |

| PEER | someone in the same field with something to say | reply this week, keep it human |

| ASK | wants advice, time, an intro, a favour | reply if it is cheap and specific, decline cleanly if not |

| SPAM | agency pitch, lead-gen sequence, crypto, "quick question" with no question | archive, no reply |

Print the counts first. Seeing "3 leads, 2 recruiters, 41 spam" is most of the

value.

Detecting a sequence

Automated outreach has a shape: an invite note with no specifics, a message

that arrives within minutes of the accept, "quick question", "I noticed you're

in {industry}", a calendar link in message one, then a bump exactly four days

later. When you see it, mark it SPAM and say which tell gave it away. The user

does not owe a reply to a script.

Replies

  • LEAD - answer the actual question in the message, in full, for free. If

it is a fit, the offer is one sentence at the end. If it is not, say so and

point them somewhere useful. Both outcomes are good.

  • RECRUITER - if the role is genuinely interesting, ask the three things

the message left out: comp band, level, and whether it is in-office. If it

is not, one line: not looking, happy to refer, and mean the refer.

  • ASK - if it costs under ten minutes and is specific, do it. If it is

"can I pick your brain", decline in one warm sentence and give them the one

answer you would have given on the call. That is the polite version and it

is also the more useful one.

  • DECLINES are short, warm and final. No "let's revisit in Q3" if there is

no Q3.

Output

Grouped by bucket, counts first, drafts only for the buckets that get replies,

each one humanized. Then the gate: the user sends them.

INBOX  ·  52 items  ·  3 LEAD, 2 RECRUITER, 4 PEER, 2 ASK, 41 SPAM

SPAM  (41) - archive. 38 are the same sequence: no-specifics invite,
"quick question" within 4 minutes of accept, calendar link in message one.

How to use it

Copy the folder

Take jakeschincariol/li-inbox from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.

Check the name does not clash

The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.