Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit
24k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
9
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
423
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself
Install
one command, takes just this skill from the repository
Exception handling: checked vs. runtime exceptions, standard exceptions, failure-capture messages, no silent ignoring
Scope: Classify the applicable OOD concerns first, then load only the focused references needed for those concerns. Load multiple references when a refactoring crosses concern boundaries.
Constraints
Before applying any OOD changes, ensure the project compiles. If compilation fails, stop immediately — do not proceed until resolved. After applying improvements, run full verification.
MANDATORY: Run ./mvnw compile or mvn compile before applying any change
SAFETY: If compilation fails, stop immediately and do not proceed — compilation failure is a blocking condition
VERIFY: Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements
PROGRESSIVE DISCLOSURE: Classify the applicable OOD concerns before reading references, then read only the references mapped to those concerns
MULTI-CONCERN CHANGES: Read multiple focused references only when the request or diagnosed code problems cross concern boundaries
PRESERVE BEHAVIOR: Apply focused, incremental refactorings without changing observable business behavior
INCREMENTAL SAFETY: Compile after each significant refactoring and keep changes easy to revert if validation reveals a regression
DEPENDENCY SAFETY: Confirm refactoring does not break imports, dependencies, class relationships, or established contracts
ADJACENT SKILLS: Use skill 122 for dedicated type-design work and skill 126 for dedicated exception-handling work; use the overlapping skill 121 references only when those topics are part of a broader OOD review
EDGE CASE: If request scope is ambiguous, stop and ask a clarifying question before applying changes
EDGE CASE: If required inputs, files, or tooling are missing, report what is missing and ask whether to proceed with setup guidance
When to use this skill
Review Java code for object-oriented design
Refactor Java code for object-oriented design
Improve Java code for object-oriented design
Fix OOP concept misuse in Java code
Identify and resolve code smells in Java code
Improve object creation patterns in Java code
Improve method design in Java code
Improve exception handling in Java code
Workflow
Compile project before OOD changes
Run ./mvnw compile or mvn compile and stop immediately if compilation fails.
Assess code and classify OOD concerns
Analyze the request and affected Java code before reading implementation guidance. Classify each relevant problem into one or more concerns:
Fundamental principles: SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI violations.
Core OOP concepts: encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism misuse.
Code smells: God Class, Feature Envy, Inappropriate Intimacy, Refused Bequest, Shotgun Surgery, or Data Clumps.
Classes and interfaces: accessibility, public fields, mutability, composition, or inheritance design.
Enums and annotations: int constants, ordinals, bit fields, ordinal indexing, or missing @Override.
Methods: parameter validation, defensive copies, signatures, null collections, or Optional.
Exceptions: exception contracts that are part of the broader OOD review.
If the request is dedicated type-design work, use skill 122. If it is dedicated exception-handling work, use skill 126.
Read only applicable OOD references
Map the classified concerns to focused references:
For SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-principles.md.
For encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-oop-concepts.md.
For object-oriented code smells, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-code-smells.md.
For factories, builders, singletons, dependency injection, or unnecessary objects, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-object-creation.md.
For class and interface boundaries, accessibility, mutability, composition, or inheritance design, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-classes-interfaces.md.
For enums, ordinals, bit fields, enum lookup, or @Override, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-enums-annotations.md.
For method contracts, validation, defensive copies, signatures, collection returns, or Optional, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-methods.md.
For exception contracts within a broader OOD review, read references/121-java-object-oriented-design-exceptions.md.
Read every reference required by a cross-concern refactoring, but do not read unrelated references.
Apply focused refactorings
Prioritize findings by impact: CRITICAL, MAINTAINABILITY, FLEXIBILITY, or CODE_QUALITY. Apply the smallest suitable refactoring for each diagnosed concern while preserving observable behavior:
Extract classes or methods to restore focused responsibilities.
Introduce or refine abstractions for extension, interface segregation, and dependency inversion.
Correct inheritance hierarchies to preserve substitutability, or replace inheritance with composition.
Move behavior to eliminate Feature Envy and improve encapsulation.
Introduce cohesive value or parameter objects for Data Clumps.
Hide exposed state and reduce unnecessary coupling.
Apply changes incrementally and compile after each significant refactoring.
Verify with full build
Run ./mvnw clean verify or mvn clean verify after applying improvements.
Report applied OOD improvements
Report findings by impact and concern, focused references used, refactorings applied, maintainability/flexibility/testability benefits, behavior-preservation evidence, and the final compilation and test result.
Reference
For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see: