Competitor Teardown Agent Skill

Competitor Teardown

Analyze competitor landing pages for positioning, messaging, and conversion strategy insights.

Process

• Capture the page - URL for fetch or screenshot upload
• Extract value proposition - Problem, ICP, transformation, unique mechanism
• Map messaging hierarchy - Headline → Subheadline → Body → CTA flow
• Score systematically - 100-point rubric
• Identify strengths and weaknesses - Actionable competitive intelligence
• Generate strategic recommendations - How to differentiate

Value Proposition Analysis Framework

Answer these four questions from the competitor's page:

| Question | What to Look For |

|----------|-----------------|

| What problem do they solve? | Pain points mentioned, problem agitation |

| Who is their ICP? | Language cues, industry references, company size signals |

| What transformation do they promise? | Before/after, outcomes, results |

| What's their unique mechanism? | Proprietary method, technology, approach |

Messaging Hierarchy Evaluation

| Element | Assessment Criteria |

|---------|---------------------|

| Headline | Matches intent? Clear benefit? Addresses pain? Most prominent? |

| Subheadline | Expands "how"? Reinforces UVP? Supports headline? |

| Body Copy | Framework used (AIDA/PAS/BAB)? Benefit-to-feature ratio? |

| CTA | Visible? Action-oriented verb? Value stated? Urgency present? |

| Trust Signals | Logos, testimonials, ratings, certifications, social proof? |

100-Point Scoring Rubric

| Category | Max Points | Scoring Criteria |

|----------|------------|------------------|

| Positioning Clarity | 15 | Clear problem/solution, obvious ICP, differentiation |

| Headline Effectiveness | 15 | Benefit-driven, specific, compelling |

| Copy Quality | 15 | Benefit-focused, scannable, persuasive |

| CTA Strategy | 15 | Visible, action-oriented, low friction |

| Trust Signals | 10 | Quality social proof, credibility markers |

| Visual Hierarchy | 10 | Clear flow, emphasis on key elements |

| Objection Handling | 10 | FAQ, guarantees, risk reversals |

| Pricing Presentation | 5 | Clear, justified, anchored |

| Brand Voice | 5 | Consistent, appropriate, memorable |

Red Flags to Identify

• Vague headlines ("The best solution for your needs")
• Feature-heavy copy without benefits
• Multiple audiences addressed on single page
• Missing or buried value proposition
• Weak or generic CTAs ("Submit," "Learn More")
• No social proof or trust signals
• Cluttered design with competing elements

Output Format

## Competitor Teardown: [Company Name]

**URL**: [URL]
**Analysis Date**: [Date]
**Overall Score**: [X/100]

### Value Proposition Analysis
- **Problem Solved**: [Description]
- **Target ICP**: [Description]
- **Promised Transformation**: [Description]
- **Unique Mechanism**: [Description or "Not clearly stated"]

### Messaging Hierarchy
| Element | Content | Effectiveness |
|---------|---------|---------------|
| Headline | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 - [Assessment] |
| Subheadline | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 |
| Primary CTA | "[Quote]" | [Score]/10 |

### Scoring Breakdown
| Category | Score | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| Positioning Clarity | /15 | |
| Headline Effectiveness | /15 | |
| Copy Quality | /15 | |
| CTA Strategy | /15 | |
| Trust Signals | /10 | |
| Visual Hierarchy | /10 | |
| Objection Handling | /10 | |
| Pricing Presentation | /5 | |
| Brand Voice | /5 | |
| **TOTAL** | **/100** | |

### Strengths (What to Learn)
1. [Strength with specific example]
2. [Strength with specific example]

### Weaknesses (Opportunities to Beat Them)
1. [Weakness with specific example]
2. [Weakness with specific example]

### Strategic Recommendations
1. [How to differentiate against this competitor]
2. [Messaging angle they're not using]

### Confidence Level: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]

Example

Input: "Analyze notion.so homepage"

Output:

## Competitor Teardown: Notion

**Overall Score**: 78/100

### Value Proposition Analysis
- **Problem Solved**: Fragmented tools for notes, docs, wikis, projects
- **Target ICP**: Knowledge workers, teams, startups
- **Promised Transformation**: One workspace for all work
- **Unique Mechanism**: Flexible blocks system, templates

### Messaging Hierarchy
| Element | Content | Effectiveness |
|---------|---------|---------------|
| Headline | "Write, plan, organize, play" | 7/10 - Broad but memorable |
| Subheadline | "Turn ideas into action with Notion's AI-powered workspace" | 8/10 - Clear value |
| Primary CTA | "Get Notion free" | 9/10 - Low friction, value-focused |

### Strengths
1. **Social proof**: Trusted by logos prominent above fold
2. **Low-friction entry**: Free tier CTA reduces conversion resistance

### Weaknesses
1. **Vague headline**: Doesn't communicate specific outcome
2. **Broad ICP**: Page tries to speak to everyone

### Strategic Recommendations
1. Position against their broadness - own a specific use case deeply
2. Lead with concrete outcomes vs features

### Confidence Level: HIGH

Guidelines

• If given screenshot only, note any sections not visible
• Extract exact quotes for messaging analysis
• Compare to best practices, not just personal opinion
• Always provide actionable differentiation strategies
• If URL inaccessible, ask for screenshot or describe limitations

Data access (Ryze MCP)

This skill works best with live account data. Connect the free Ryze MCP once and Claude reads your Google Ads, Meta Ads, GA4 and Search Console directly:

• claude.ai / Claude Desktop: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
• Claude Code: claude mcp add ryze --transport http https://connector.get-ryze.ai/mcp
• Cursor: Settings → MCP → add the same URL

Setup guide: https://www.get-ryze.ai/how-to-connect-claude-to-google-meta-ads-mcp