Determine runtime owner, first-fix layer, and canonical long-term module or package owner in layered codebases. Use when placing code across UI vs platform shell vs runtime orchestration vs domain or application vs shared core vs adapter or integration layers, debugging ownership issues, removing duplicate policy paths, or answering "where should this live?" architecture questions.
2k tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
4
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
131
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself
Install
one command, takes just this skill from the repository
owns native shell concerns, OS bridges, local device integrations, filesystem or permission bridges, process or session plumbing, and platform-local persistence helpers
this is not automatically the Canonical long-term owner
Domain or application layer
owns canonical product workflow, business rules, reusable application services, and cross-interface behavior
Shared core layer
owns shared types, enums, validation, normalization, capability logic, and pure logic used across runtimes
Adapter or integration layer
owns concrete protocol, provider, vendor, transport, or API integration behavior
does not own cross-provider or cross-integration product policy
Translate these generic layers into the repo's actual module, package, crate, or service names before making a recommendation.
Hard-Cut Rules
Do not leave reusable domain policy in the runtime orchestration layer just because the wrong behavior currently happens there.
Do not put UI state, layout state, restore state, or user-facing presentation ownership in the runtime orchestration layer.
Do not put platform shell or native integration concerns in the domain or application layer.
Do not put cross-provider or cross-vendor product policy in adapter or integration layers.
Do not put pure validation, normalization, or capability logic in orchestration code when it can live in shared core or a narrow domain module.
Common Judgments
If the question is "who should decide this for all future interfaces?" the answer is usually the domain or application layer, a narrow domain package, or shared core, not the runtime orchestration layer.
If the question is "where do I patch this bug first so the product stops doing the wrong thing?" the answer may still be the runtime orchestration layer.
If the question is "who owns the wire shape or payload type?" the answer is usually the shared API or core type layer, not the runtime orchestration layer.
If the question is "who owns vendor-specific behavior?" the answer is the relevant adapter or integration layer, but only for adapter behavior, not canonical product policy.
Example Pattern
Example: a planning policy bug currently lives in a runtime runner module.
Runtime owner: runtime orchestration layer
First fix owner: runtime orchestration layer
Canonical long-term owner: domain or application layer
Type or capability owner: shared core layer
Competing owners that are wrong: UI layer, platform shell, adapter or integration layers
Additional Resource
For a reusable classification matrix and example splits, see references/ownership-matrix.md.
How to use it
Copy the folder
Take instructa/architecture-ownership from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
Check the name does not clash
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.