Validate changes before submitting a pull request. Run comprehensive checks including lint, tests, alignment review, and RFC analysis. Use before creating a PR, when asked if code is ready for review, or before pushing for PR.
npx skills add https://github.com/huggingface/OpenEnv --skill pre-submit-pr
Comprehensive validation before submitting a pull request. Run this before creating or updating a PR.
git fetch origin main to get latest maingit rev-list --count HEAD..origin/main to check commits behindgit merge origin/mainbash .claude/hooks/lint.sh - format check (includes ruff format + ruff check)bash .claude/hooks/test.sh - run testsbash .claude/hooks/check-debug.sh - find debug code.claude/docs/PRINCIPLES.md and .claude/docs/INVARIANTS.mdsrc/openenv/core/, flag for RFC considerationrfcs/ for conflicts.claude/docs/REPO_WALKTHROUGH.md against the current repo structuresrc/, envs/, .claude/, or rfcs//update-docs before PRbash .claude/hooks/post-push-pr.shPR description quality, CI check status
## Pre-Submit PR Report
### Branch Freshness
| Check | Status | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| Up to date with main | YES/NO | [X commits behind, merged if needed] |
### Automated Checks
| Check | Status | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| Lint | PASS/FAIL | [summary] |
| Tests | PASS/FAIL | [X passed, Y failed] |
| Debug code | CLEAN/FOUND | [details] |
### Alignment Review
#### Tier 1: Fixes Required (blocking)
- [ ] path/file.py:123 - [issue description]
#### Tier 2: Discussion Points (flag for reviewers)
[ALIGNMENT FLAGS or "None identified"]
### Invariant Check
[List any invariants at risk, or "All invariants maintained"]
### RFC Status
[NOT REQUIRED / RECOMMENDED / REQUIRED: reason]
### Documentation Freshness
[UP TO DATE / UPDATED: list of changes made to REPO_WALKTHROUGH.md]
[STALE DOCS: run /update-docs — list of stale references found]
### Verdict: READY FOR PR / ISSUES TO ADDRESS
### Summary for PR Description
[2-3 sentences summarizing changes for the PR description]
The following issues block PR submission:
These should be noted in PR but don't block:
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.
Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.
Take huggingface/pre-submit-pr from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.