834 tokens
context cost
the whole folder, loaded on every use
1
files
instructions only
0
copies elsewhere
how many repositories repackaged it
867
stars on the repo
on the repository, not the skill itself
Install
one command, takes just this skill from the repository
npx skills add https://github.com/hoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor --skill optimization-suggest
Copy
The instruction itself
8 sections, as written by the author
Optimization Suggest
Generate data-driven optimization recommendations for Claude Code usage.
The user provides: $ARGUMENTS
This may be:
"all" or empty (default: comprehensive optimization scan)
"cost" for cost reduction focus
"speed" for performance/speed focus
"quality" for error reduction focus
"efficiency" for workflow efficiency focus
Procedure
Gather optimization data from http://localhost:4820:
GET /api/sessions?limit=200 — session history
GET /api/analytics — tool and token analytics
GET /api/pricing/cost — cost data
GET /api/pricing — pricing rules for model comparison
Sample event streams for behavioral analysis
Analyze optimization opportunities :
💰 Cost Optimization
Model downgrade opportunities : Tasks completed with expensive models that could use cheaper ones
Compare success rates per model per task type
Calculate savings from model substitution
Cache optimization : Sessions with low cache hit rates
Identify sessions that could benefit from better prompt caching
Early termination : Sessions that ran longer than needed
Detect sessions where useful work completed well before session end
Compaction reduction : Sessions hitting context limits
Suggest breaking large tasks into smaller sessions
⚡ Speed Optimization
Tool selection : Faster alternatives for commonly-used tool patterns
Subagent parallelization : Tasks that could run in parallel
Session planning : Better upfront context to reduce back-and-forth
Preemptive context loading : Frequently needed files/context
🛡 Quality Optimization
Error prevention : Common error patterns with preventive measures
Tool reliability : Tools with high failure rates and alternatives
Validation gaps : Sessions lacking verification steps
Recovery strategies : Better error handling patterns
🔄 Workflow Optimization
Session sizing : Optimal session scope based on historical success
Task decomposition : Complex sessions that should be split
Automation candidates : Repetitive workflows to automate
Knowledge reuse : Patterns where previous session context could help
Quantify each recommendation :
Estimated impact (cost savings $, time savings %, error reduction %)
Implementation effort (low/medium/high)
Confidence level based on data available
Priority score = Impact × Confidence / Effort
Present as a prioritized optimization plan:
| # | Recommendation | Category | Impact | Effort | Priority |
|---|---------------|----------|--------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Specific action | 💰/⚡/🛡/🔄 | High | Low | ★★★★★ |
| 2 | Specific action | ... | ... | ... | ★★★★☆ |
For the top 5 recommendations, include:
Detailed explanation with supporting data
Step-by-step implementation guide
Expected before/after metrics
How to measure success