Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.
npx skills add https://github.com/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill verify-bug
> [!IMPORTANT]
> Post-merge UAT verification workflow. Walks JIRA reproduce steps, performs comparative audits (Before/After), attaches evidence to JIRA, and transitions status on PASS.
Optional args: slug=<feature>, ticket=<id/url>, mode=interactive|autonomous|channel, channel=<id>, auto_continue=true|false, profile=business|hybrid|technical.
When the user asks to perform this workflow, execute the following steps:
Goal: Prove a bug fix works in the UAT environment via comparative Before/After evidence, then transition ticket status.
/verify-bug <jira-url-or-key> [--baseline-image <url>]
> [!TIP]
> Sub-Agent Delegation: If your platform supports sub-agents (e.g., Claude, OpenCode, Gemini, Kiro), delegate steps 1-3 below to your JIRA Analyst sub-agent (e.g., @specialist-jira-analyst). If sub-agents are NOT supported (e.g., Antigravity, Windsurf), you must execute these steps yourself.
Market, Reproduce steps, and Expected Result.Test data - <MARKET> UAT. Parse credentials and module-specific data (e.g., customer codes).For each market in scope:
<SKILLS>/common/common-web-visual-testing/references/diagnostic-decoder.md; if it indicates VPN is required, connect VPN and retry.playwright-cli -s={TICKET}-{MARKET} or Appium session.hover the target element (warning, button, price) before screenshotting.Expected Result.Actual Result or original bug screenshot.If the verdict is NOT PASS:
common-web-visual-testing; if synced references are available, consult <SKILLS>/common/common-web-visual-testing/references/diagnostic-decoder.md.VPN NOT CONNECTED error? ACCOUNT BLOCKED? Or a genuine CODE REGRESSION?🟢 PASS / 🔴 FAIL badges.Ready for UAT → Ready for Production.Reopened.docs/srs/srs-walkthrough.md.slug, operator_profile (carried, not re-inferred), verdict (PASS/FAIL/NEEDS-HUMAN), walkthrough path, diagnostic label, outcome report, next workflow.# Walkthrough: [Name]
## Scope
## Acceptance Criteria
## Evidence
| Check | Result | Evidence |
| ------- | ------------------- | ---------- |
| [check] | [PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED] | [evidence] |
## Risks
## Outcome Report
feature_status: implemented | blocked
requirement_trace: BRD-OBJ-* -> REQ-* -> AC-* -> SRS-* -> evidence
completed_evidence: []; missing_evidence: []; decision_needed: []; recommended_next_workflow: deploy-release | dev-fix
## Next Workflow
deploy-release | dev-fix
Call get_session_cost(workflow="verify-bug") before final handoff.
-s={TICKET}.Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Intelligently organizes your files and folders across your computer by understanding context, finding duplicates, suggesting better structures, and automating cleanup tasks. Reduces cognitive load and keeps your digital workspace tidy without manual effort.
Generates creative domain name ideas for your project and checks availability across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .dev, .ai, etc.). Saves hours of brainstorming and manual checking.
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.
Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
Take hoangnguyen0403/verify-bug from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.