guia-matthieu/pricing-strategy
Design products around price using Madhavan Ramanujam's \"Monetizing Innovation\" methodology—determine willingness to pay before you build, not after. Use when: **Set pricing for a new product** before or during development; **Validate willingness to pay** before investing in features; **Structure pricing tiers** (Good-Better-Best) for different segments; **Choose the right monetization model** (subscription, usage-based, freemium, etc.); **Diagnose why a product isn't monetizing** as expected
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill pricing-strategy
> Design products around price using Madhavan Ramanujam's "Monetizing Innovation" methodology—determine willingness to pay before you build, not after.
Use this skill when you need to:
This skill is particularly valuable for:
Source: Madhavan Ramanujam & Georg Tacke - *Monetizing Innovation: How Smart Companies Design the Product Around the Price* (2016)
Core Principle: Price determines product, not the other way around. Companies that design products around willingness to pay—rather than pricing as an afterthought—capture dramatically more value.
> "Price isn't a number. It's the perceived value that your product holds for the customer."
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|-------------|------------|
| Structures production workflow | Final creative direction |
| Suggests technical approaches | Equipment and tool choices |
| Creates templates and checklists | Quality standards |
| Identifies best practices | Brand/voice decisions |
| Generates script outlines | Final script approval |
When invoked, I will guide you through the Monetizing Innovation methodology:
Provide information about your pricing situation:
Example prompts:
Information that helps:
Before setting prices, identify which failure type threatens your product:
| Failure Type | Symptoms | Root Cause |
|--------------|----------|------------|
| Feature Shock | Too many features, high price, confused value prop | Built everything instead of what customers pay for |
| Minivation | Strong adoption, weak revenue | Priced too low, leaving money on table |
| Hidden Gem | Great innovation stuck inside company | Dismissed as "not our core business" |
| Undead | No willingness to pay at any price | Built on assumptions, not customer evidence |
Diagnostic Questions:
Critical: This happens BEFORE product design is finalized, not after.
Ask potential customers:
Follow every answer with: "Why?"
| Method | Best For | Sample Size |
|--------|----------|-------------|
| 1:1 Interviews | Deep understanding, B2B | 10-20 customers |
| Focus Groups | Testing reactions, consumer | 3-5 groups of 6-8 |
| Surveys | Quantitative validation | 100+ responses |
| Purchase Simulations | Realistic behavior data | 50+ scenarios |
Critical shift: Segment by needs and willingness to pay, NOT demographics.
Wrong segmentation:
Right segmentation:
| Feature Type | Definition | Identification | Action |
|--------------|------------|----------------|--------|
| Leaders | Drive purchase decision, high WTP | >50% highly value, willing to pay | Emphasize, charge premium |
| Fillers | Nice-to-have, rounds out offering | 30-50% value, moderate WTP | Include in bundles |
| Killers | Low value, blocks deals if included | <20% value OR >20% actively dislike | Remove or make optional |
GOOD (Entry) BETTER (Standard) BEST (Premium)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Core Leaders only Leaders + Key Fillers All Leaders + Fillers
Self-service Email support Priority support
Basic limits Generous limits Unlimited/Custom
$X/month $2-3X/month $5-10X/month
Configuration Principles:
Key insight: How you charge is often more important than how much.
| Model | Description | Best For | Example |
|-------|-------------|----------|---------|
| Subscription | Fixed recurring payment | Predictable value delivery | Netflix, SaaS |
| Usage-Based | Pay per unit consumed | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Freemium | Free tier + paid upgrades | High-volume acquisition | Slack, Dropbox |
| Dynamic | Prices vary by demand | Perishable inventory | Airlines, Uber |
| One-Time | Single purchase | Finite value delivery | Software licenses |
Many successful products combine models:
> "Behavioral pricing is the magic that happens when value pricing meets irrational customer psychology."
1. Compromise Effect
When presented with 3 options, people choose the middle.
2. Anchoring
First price seen influences all subsequent judgments.
3. Price = Quality Signal
Higher prices imply better quality.
4. Razor/Razor Blades
Low upfront cost, revenue from consumables/services.
5. Pennies-a-Day
Break prices into smallest time unit.
6. Psychological Thresholds
Prices just below round numbers convert better.
> "When your product launches and the market is less than enthusiastic, you'll feel pressure to cut the price. That's almost always a bad idea."
Before approving ANY price cut, require your team to propose 3 non-pricing solutions:
Situation: Early-stage analytics tool, competitors range from free to enterprise
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Feature Analysis:
| Feature | Leaders | Fillers | Killers |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| Real-time dashboards | ✓ | | |
| Custom reports | ✓ | | |
| Slack integration | | ✓ | |
| 50+ data connectors | | ✓ | |
| AI predictions | | | ✓ (too early) |
| White-labeling | | | ✓ (only 10% need) |
Tier Structure:
STARTER ($49/mo) GROWTH ($199/mo) SCALE ($499/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
3 dashboards Unlimited dashboards Unlimited + custom
5 data sources 20 data sources Unlimited sources
Email support Chat support Dedicated CSM
Slack integration SSO + audit logs
Monetization Model: Subscription with usage-based overage for data volume
Behavioral Tactics Applied:
Situation: Strategy consulting firm, hourly billing, price pressure from clients
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Monetization Model Shift: From hourly to value-based
New Pricing Structure:
DIAGNOSTIC ($15K) IMPLEMENTATION ($75K) PARTNERSHIP ($25K/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2-week assessment 12-week execution Ongoing advisory
Defined deliverables Milestone-based Monthly retainer
Fixed scope Performance bonus Unlimited access
No risk to client Shared upside Predictable cost
Key Changes:
Result: 40% increase in average engagement value, improved client satisfaction
INTRODUCTION (2 min)
"We're exploring a new [product/service] and want to understand
what would be valuable to you. This is about understanding value,
not selling you anything."
CURRENT SITUATION (5 min)
- How do you currently solve [problem]?
- What do you spend on this today (time/money)?
- What's frustrating about current solutions?
VALUE EXPLORATION (10 min)
- What would an ideal solution do for you?
- Which of these features [show list] matter most?
- Why is [top feature] important to you?
PRICING QUESTIONS (10 min)
- "What would be an acceptable price for this?"
- "What would be an expensive price?"
- "What would be prohibitively expensive?"
- "At $X, would you definitely buy, probably buy,
probably not buy, or definitely not buy?"
- "Why did you choose that answer?"
WRAP-UP (3 min)
- What would make this a no-brainer purchase?
- Anything else we should know?
TIER NAME: _______________
TARGET SEGMENT: _______________
PRICE POINT: $___/[period]
LEADERS (must-have features):
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
FILLERS (nice-to-have):
1. _______________
2. _______________
EXCLUDED (saved for higher tiers):
1. _______________
2. _______________
POSITIONING STATEMENT:
"For [segment] who need [primary job], [Tier] provides [key benefit]
at [price], unlike [alternative] which [limitation]."
| Factor | Subscription | Usage | Freemium | One-Time |
|--------|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| Customer prefers predictability | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Value varies by usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Need volume for network effects | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ |
| High CAC, need long payback | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Easy to measure usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
(✓✓✓ = strong fit, ✓ = weak fit)
Before approving any price reduction:
Primary Source:
Additional Resources:
Take guia-matthieu/pricing-strategy from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.