Design products around price using Madhavan Ramanujam's \"Monetizing Innovation\" methodology—determine willingness to pay before you build, not after. Use when: **Set pricing for a new product** before or during development; **Validate willingness to pay** before investing in features; **Structure pricing tiers** (Good-Better-Best) for different segments; **Choose the right monetization model** (subscription, usage-based, freemium, etc.); **Diagnose why a product isn't monetizing** as expected
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill pricing-strategy
> Design products around price using Madhavan Ramanujam's "Monetizing Innovation" methodology—determine willingness to pay before you build, not after.
Use this skill when you need to:
This skill is particularly valuable for:
Source: Madhavan Ramanujam & Georg Tacke - *Monetizing Innovation: How Smart Companies Design the Product Around the Price* (2016)
Core Principle: Price determines product, not the other way around. Companies that design products around willingness to pay—rather than pricing as an afterthought—capture dramatically more value.
> "Price isn't a number. It's the perceived value that your product holds for the customer."
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|-------------|------------|
| Structures production workflow | Final creative direction |
| Suggests technical approaches | Equipment and tool choices |
| Creates templates and checklists | Quality standards |
| Identifies best practices | Brand/voice decisions |
| Generates script outlines | Final script approval |
When invoked, I will guide you through the Monetizing Innovation methodology:
Provide information about your pricing situation:
Example prompts:
Information that helps:
Before setting prices, identify which failure type threatens your product:
| Failure Type | Symptoms | Root Cause |
|--------------|----------|------------|
| Feature Shock | Too many features, high price, confused value prop | Built everything instead of what customers pay for |
| Minivation | Strong adoption, weak revenue | Priced too low, leaving money on table |
| Hidden Gem | Great innovation stuck inside company | Dismissed as "not our core business" |
| Undead | No willingness to pay at any price | Built on assumptions, not customer evidence |
Diagnostic Questions:
Critical: This happens BEFORE product design is finalized, not after.
Ask potential customers:
Follow every answer with: "Why?"
| Method | Best For | Sample Size |
|--------|----------|-------------|
| 1:1 Interviews | Deep understanding, B2B | 10-20 customers |
| Focus Groups | Testing reactions, consumer | 3-5 groups of 6-8 |
| Surveys | Quantitative validation | 100+ responses |
| Purchase Simulations | Realistic behavior data | 50+ scenarios |
Critical shift: Segment by needs and willingness to pay, NOT demographics.
Wrong segmentation:
Right segmentation:
| Feature Type | Definition | Identification | Action |
|--------------|------------|----------------|--------|
| Leaders | Drive purchase decision, high WTP | >50% highly value, willing to pay | Emphasize, charge premium |
| Fillers | Nice-to-have, rounds out offering | 30-50% value, moderate WTP | Include in bundles |
| Killers | Low value, blocks deals if included | <20% value OR >20% actively dislike | Remove or make optional |
GOOD (Entry) BETTER (Standard) BEST (Premium)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Core Leaders only Leaders + Key Fillers All Leaders + Fillers
Self-service Email support Priority support
Basic limits Generous limits Unlimited/Custom
$X/month $2-3X/month $5-10X/month
Configuration Principles:
Key insight: How you charge is often more important than how much.
| Model | Description | Best For | Example |
|-------|-------------|----------|---------|
| Subscription | Fixed recurring payment | Predictable value delivery | Netflix, SaaS |
| Usage-Based | Pay per unit consumed | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Freemium | Free tier + paid upgrades | High-volume acquisition | Slack, Dropbox |
| Dynamic | Prices vary by demand | Perishable inventory | Airlines, Uber |
| One-Time | Single purchase | Finite value delivery | Software licenses |
Many successful products combine models:
> "Behavioral pricing is the magic that happens when value pricing meets irrational customer psychology."
1. Compromise Effect
When presented with 3 options, people choose the middle.
2. Anchoring
First price seen influences all subsequent judgments.
3. Price = Quality Signal
Higher prices imply better quality.
4. Razor/Razor Blades
Low upfront cost, revenue from consumables/services.
5. Pennies-a-Day
Break prices into smallest time unit.
6. Psychological Thresholds
Prices just below round numbers convert better.
> "When your product launches and the market is less than enthusiastic, you'll feel pressure to cut the price. That's almost always a bad idea."
Before approving ANY price cut, require your team to propose 3 non-pricing solutions:
Situation: Early-stage analytics tool, competitors range from free to enterprise
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Feature Analysis:
| Feature | Leaders | Fillers | Killers |
|---------|---------|---------|---------|
| Real-time dashboards | ✓ | | |
| Custom reports | ✓ | | |
| Slack integration | | ✓ | |
| 50+ data connectors | | ✓ | |
| AI predictions | | | ✓ (too early) |
| White-labeling | | | ✓ (only 10% need) |
Tier Structure:
STARTER ($49/mo) GROWTH ($199/mo) SCALE ($499/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
3 dashboards Unlimited dashboards Unlimited + custom
5 data sources 20 data sources Unlimited sources
Email support Chat support Dedicated CSM
Slack integration SSO + audit logs
Monetization Model: Subscription with usage-based overage for data volume
Behavioral Tactics Applied:
Situation: Strategy consulting firm, hourly billing, price pressure from clients
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Monetization Model Shift: From hourly to value-based
New Pricing Structure:
DIAGNOSTIC ($15K) IMPLEMENTATION ($75K) PARTNERSHIP ($25K/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2-week assessment 12-week execution Ongoing advisory
Defined deliverables Milestone-based Monthly retainer
Fixed scope Performance bonus Unlimited access
No risk to client Shared upside Predictable cost
Key Changes:
Result: 40% increase in average engagement value, improved client satisfaction
INTRODUCTION (2 min)
"We're exploring a new [product/service] and want to understand
what would be valuable to you. This is about understanding value,
not selling you anything."
CURRENT SITUATION (5 min)
- How do you currently solve [problem]?
- What do you spend on this today (time/money)?
- What's frustrating about current solutions?
VALUE EXPLORATION (10 min)
- What would an ideal solution do for you?
- Which of these features [show list] matter most?
- Why is [top feature] important to you?
PRICING QUESTIONS (10 min)
- "What would be an acceptable price for this?"
- "What would be an expensive price?"
- "What would be prohibitively expensive?"
- "At $X, would you definitely buy, probably buy,
probably not buy, or definitely not buy?"
- "Why did you choose that answer?"
WRAP-UP (3 min)
- What would make this a no-brainer purchase?
- Anything else we should know?
TIER NAME: _______________
TARGET SEGMENT: _______________
PRICE POINT: $___/[period]
LEADERS (must-have features):
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
FILLERS (nice-to-have):
1. _______________
2. _______________
EXCLUDED (saved for higher tiers):
1. _______________
2. _______________
POSITIONING STATEMENT:
"For [segment] who need [primary job], [Tier] provides [key benefit]
at [price], unlike [alternative] which [limitation]."
| Factor | Subscription | Usage | Freemium | One-Time |
|--------|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| Customer prefers predictability | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Value varies by usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Need volume for network effects | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ |
| High CAC, need long payback | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Easy to measure usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
(✓✓✓ = strong fit, ✓ = weak fit)
Before approving any price reduction:
Primary Source:
Additional Resources:
A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.
Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store
NGS analysis toolkit. BAM to bigWig conversion, QC (correlation, PCA, fingerprints), heatmaps/profiles (TSS, peaks), for ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, ATAC-seq visualization.
Materials science toolkit. Crystal structures (CIF, POSCAR), phase diagrams, band structure, DOS, Materials Project integration, format conversion, for computational materials science.
Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.
Take guia-matthieu/pricing-strategy from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.