Build profitable Google Ads campaigns by applying Perry Marshall's 80/20 principles to paid search optimization Use when: **Setting up a new Google Ads account** from scratch; **Optimizing existing campaigns** that are underperforming; **Structuring campaigns** for maximum quality score and ROI; **Applying 80/20 thinking** to identify high-leverage optimizations; **Scaling profitable campaigns** without wasting budget
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill google-ads-expert
> Build profitable Google Ads campaigns by applying Perry Marshall's 80/20 principles to paid search optimization
| Aspect | Details |
|--------|---------|
| Source | Ultimate Guide to Google Ads, 80/20 Sales and Marketing |
| Expert | Perry Marshall - Pioneer of Google Ads education, 80/20 marketing guru |
| Core Principle | "Most people think traffic is 80% of the battle, but it's really 20%. CONVERSION is 80% of the battle. Once conversion is solid, traffic mysteries solve themselves." |
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|-------------|------------|
| Structures content frameworks | Final messaging |
| Suggests persuasion techniques | Brand voice |
| Creates draft variations | Version selection |
| Identifies optimization opportunities | Publication timing |
| Analyzes competitor approaches | Strategic direction |
This skill combines Google Ads technical mastery with strategic 80/20 thinking to help you build campaigns that are profitable from the start.
You'll learn to:
The result: Campaigns that make money consistently, not just get clicks.
Help me structure a Google Ads campaign for [business/product] using Perry Marshall's
match type segmentation approach. I want to maximize Quality Score and control.
Apply 80/20 analysis to my Google Ads account. Here are my top 20 keywords by spend:
[list]. Where should I focus my optimization efforts for maximum impact?
Create a lead qualification strategy for my Google Ads campaigns. I sell [product]
and waste money on [type of bad clicks]. How do I "rack the shotgun"?
My campaigns are profitable at $X/day but I want to scale. Use the 80/20 approach
to help me identify how to increase spend without killing ROI.
Prioritize my optimization checklist for [campaign type]. What's the 80/20 order
of operations I should follow before spending more money?
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 80/20 IN GOOGLE ADS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 80% of conversions come from 20% of keywords │
│ 80% of costs come from 20% of keywords │
│ 80% of wasted spend comes from 20% of search terms │
│ │
│ BUT ALSO: │
│ │
│ 4% of keywords drive 64% of conversions (80/20 of 80/20) │
│ 1% of keywords drive ~50% of conversions │
│ │
│ "Find the vital few, ignore the trivial many" │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Strategic Implication: Don't optimize everything equally. Find your top performers and make them even better. Find your worst performers and eliminate them.
Before worrying about traffic, get conversion right.
> "Most people think traffic is 80% of the battle, but it's really 20%. CONVERSION is 80% of the battle."
The Order of Operations:
| Priority | Focus | Why |
|----------|-------|-----|
| 1 | Landing page conversion | Without this, all traffic is wasted |
| 2 | Offer/value proposition | Must be compelling enough to convert |
| 3 | Ad relevance to landing page | Quality Score and conversion both improve |
| 4 | Keyword selection | Target the right searchers |
| 5 | Traffic scaling | Only AFTER 1-4 are solid |
Conversion Benchmarks:
Match Type Segmentation:
Separate your keywords by match type into different ad groups or campaigns:
Campaign: [Product Name]
├── Ad Group: Exact Match Keywords
│ └── [keyword] → dedicated ads
├── Ad Group: Phrase Match Keywords
│ └── "keyword" → dedicated ads
├── Ad Group: Modified Broad Match
│ └── +keyword → dedicated ads
└── Ad Group: Broad Match (for discovery)
└── keyword → catch-all ads
Why This Works:
The Peel and Stick Technique:
Result: Continuous refinement, higher Quality Scores, lower costs.
> "The art of sorting out your customers, weeding out the qualified from the non-qualified, is one of the most important skills you can develop."
80/20 Reality: 80% of people who click will never buy. You're paying for all of them.
Pre-Qualification Tactics:
| Tactic | How It Works | Example |
|--------|--------------|---------|
| Price in ad | Scares away non-buyers | "$499/month starting price" |
| Specificity | Attracts only right audience | "Enterprise-only" or "For teams of 50+" |
| Qualification language | Self-selection | "If you're serious about..." |
| Negative keywords | Block bad searchers | -free, -cheap, -DIY, -jobs |
| Callout extensions | Set expectations | "Minimum $10K project" |
Five Power Disqualifiers:
Before someone becomes a lead, they should pass:
Landing Page Qualification:
Peel back optimization layers in the right order:
OPTIMIZATION PRIORITY
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ OUTER LAYER (Do First) │
│ ├── Match type segmentation │
│ ├── Ad extensions (all of them) │
│ └── Negative keywords │
│ │
│ MIDDLE LAYER (Do Second) │
│ ├── Ad copy split testing │
│ ├── Landing page optimization │
│ └── Bid adjustments by device │
│ │
│ INNER LAYER (Do Third) │
│ ├── Audience targeting │
│ ├── Day/time bidding │
│ └── Geographic bid adjustments │
│ │
│ CORE (Only After Everything Else) │
│ └── Increase budget/bids │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Perry's Rule:
> "Your first response should NOT be 'I'm going to spend more money.' Your first response should be 'Am I optimizing everything I can really optimize?'"
Where to Put Your Money:
| Performance Level | Budget Allocation | Strategy |
|-------------------|-------------------|----------|
| Top 20% of keywords | 64% of budget | Scale aggressively |
| Middle 60% | 30% of budget | Test and optimize |
| Bottom 20% | 6% of budget | Cut or pause |
Identifying Your 80/20:
The 80/20 of 80/20:
When to Scale:
Only after:
How to Scale:
| Method | When to Use | Risk Level |
|--------|-------------|------------|
| Increase bids on winners | Top 20% keywords | Low |
| Add similar keywords | Proven ad groups | Medium |
| Expand match types | Exact → Phrase | Medium |
| New campaigns/audiences | After core is solid | Higher |
| Increase daily budget | All above done | Low |
Warning Signs to Stop Scaling:
Tiered Offering Strategy:
> "20% of people are willing to spend 4x the money for a better experience."
If your main offer is $100, consider:
Run separate campaigns for each tier - the economics are different.
Predictive Budgeting:
Using 80/20 math to predict market size:
Plan campaigns and landing pages for each segment.
Situation: Online store selling specialty kitchen equipment. Spending $5,000/month on Google Ads with 2.5% conversion rate. Wants to improve ROI.
80/20 Analysis:
Exported 90 days of data, found:
Action Plan:
1. Immediate (Outer Layer):
2. Structure (Match Types):
3. Qualify Better:
4. Scale Winners:
Results after 60 days:
Situation: SaaS company generating leads via Google Ads. Getting lots of clicks but low quality leads. Sales team complaining about tire-kickers.
Problem Diagnosis:
Using 80/20 thinking:
Rack the Shotgun Implementation:
1. Ad Copy Qualification:
Before: "Project Management Software - Free Trial"
After: "Project Management for Teams 50+ | Starting $499/mo"
2. Landing Page Qualification:
Added "Is [Product] Right For You?" quiz:
Score < 60 = Blog content offer
Score 60-80 = Self-serve trial
Score > 80 = Sales call booking
3. Campaign Structure:
4. Negative Keywords:
Added: -free, -open source, -small business, -startup, -cheap, -alternative to [competitor targeting SMB]
Results:
## Google Ads 80/20 Audit: [Account Name]
### 1. Data Pull (Last 90 Days)
- [ ] Export all keyword data with conversions
- [ ] Export Search Terms Report
- [ ] Export campaign/ad group performance
- [ ] Note current spend and ROAS
### 2. 80/20 Analysis
**Keywords:**
- Total active keywords: ___
- Keywords with 0 conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
- Keywords driving 80% of conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
- Keywords driving 50% of conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
**Campaigns:**
- Campaign driving most conversions: ___
- Campaign with worst ROAS: ___
### 3. Outer Layer Optimization
- [ ] Match types segmented? Y/N
- [ ] Negative keyword list comprehensive? Y/N
- [ ] All ad extensions enabled? Y/N
- [ ] Sitelinks
- [ ] Callouts
- [ ] Structured snippets
- [ ] Call extensions (if applicable)
- [ ] Location (if applicable)
### 4. Qualification Assessment
- [ ] Price/qualification in ad copy? Y/N
- [ ] Landing page qualifies visitors? Y/N
- [ ] Negative keywords block non-buyers? Y/N
### 5. Priority Actions
1. Quick win:
2. Biggest impact:
3. Scale opportunity:
### 6. Budget Reallocation
- Pause: $___/month
- Shift to winners: $___/month
- Test budget: $___/month
## Campaign Structure: [Product/Service]
### Campaign 1: Brand (Exact)
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Brand terms only
- Goal: Capture brand searches cheaply
### Campaign 2: Core Product (Exact)
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 40% of total
- Keywords: Top 20% performers
- Ad groups: 1 per keyword theme (5-10 keywords max)
- Goal: Maximum ROAS
### Campaign 3: Core Product (Phrase/BMM)
- Match type: Phrase + Broad Match Modifier
- Budget: 30% of total
- Keywords: Same as exact but expanded
- Goal: Discover new exact match candidates
### Campaign 4: Discovery (Broad)
- Match type: Broad
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Category-level terms
- Goal: Find new keyword opportunities
- Review: Weekly search terms report
### Campaign 5: Competitor
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Competitor brand names
- Goal: Conquest qualified traffic
### Negative Keyword Master List
Apply to all campaigns:
- [Non-buyer terms]: free, cheap, DIY, etc.
- [Wrong audience]: jobs, careers, salary, etc.
- [Irrelevant]: [specific to your business]
## Weekly Google Ads Check: [Week of ___]
### 10-Minute Daily Check
- [ ] Budget pacing on track?
- [ ] Any major CPA spikes?
- [ ] Disapproved ads?
### Weekly Deep Dive (30 min)
**Search Terms Report:**
- New terms to add as exact: ___
- New negative keywords: ___
**Performance Review:**
- Top performer this week: ___
- Worst performer this week: ___
- Action taken: ___
**Ad Testing:**
- Tests running: ___
- Tests to conclude: ___
- New tests to start: ___
**Quality Score Check:**
- Keywords <6 QS: ___
- Action: ___
### Monthly Strategic Review
- [ ] 80/20 analysis updated
- [ ] Budget reallocation needed?
- [ ] New campaign opportunities?
- [ ] Scaling opportunities?
sources/books/marshall-google-ads-8020.mdA set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.
Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.
Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.
Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store
NGS analysis toolkit. BAM to bigWig conversion, QC (correlation, PCA, fingerprints), heatmaps/profiles (TSS, peaks), for ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, ATAC-seq visualization.
Materials science toolkit. Crystal structures (CIF, POSCAR), phase diagrams, band structure, DOS, Materials Project integration, format conversion, for computational materials science.
Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.
Take guia-matthieu/google-ads-expert from the repository into ~/.claude/skills for personal
use, or into .claude/skills inside a project.
The agent identifies a skill by the name field in its header. Two skills with the
same name cannot sit side by side — one of them will be ignored.